Teaching integrated land use-transportation planning topics, readings, and strategies

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 304-316

  Krizek, Kevin ^a   Levinson, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinary; Land use planning; Pedagogy; Teaching; Transportation planning

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND USE PLANNING; TEACHING; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

EID: 27844509156     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X04267731     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. American Collegiate Schools of Planning. 2001. Guide to graduate education in urban and regional planning. Retrieved from http://www.acsp.org/ Guide/guide_index.htm.
2. Baum, H. S. 1997. Teaching practice. Journal of Planning Educat ion and Research 17:21-29.
3. Birch, E. 2001. Practitioners and the art of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20 (4): 407-22.
4. Blakely, E., and S. Sharpe. 1993. Planners, heal thyselves: Planning education, educators, and practitioners in the next century. Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (2): 139-40.
5. Boarnet, M. G., and R. Crane. 2001. Travel by design: The influence of urban form on travel New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Burby, R. J. 1992. Comprehensive impact assessment in planning education and a course syllabus. Journal of Planning Education and Research 12 (1): 67-75.
7. Cervero, R. 1996. Jobs-housing balance revisited: Trends and impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (4): 492-511.
8. _. 1998. The transit metropolis: A global inquiry. Washington, DC: Island Press.
9. Crane, R. 1998. Travel by design? Access 98 (12): 2-7.
10. Downs, A. 1992. Stuck in traffic: Coping with peak-hour congestion. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution/Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
11. _. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution/Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
12. Drummond, W. J. 1995. Extending the revolution: Teaching land use planning in a GIS environment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 13 (4): 280-91.
13. Dupuit, J. 1844. De la mesure de l'utilite des travaux publics. Annales desponts et chaussees, memoires et documents [2.sup.e] ser., 8 (2): 332-75.
14. Reprint, "On the measurement of the utility of public works," International Economic Papers, no. 2, London: Macmillan, 1954.
15. Ewing, R. 1997a. Counterpoint: Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (1): 107-26.
16. _. 1997b, Transportation & land use innovations: When you can't pave your way out of congestion. Chicago: American Planning Association.
17. Friedmann, J. 1996. The core curriculum in planning revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research 15:89-104.
18. Giuliano, G. 1995. The weakening transportation-land use connection. Access, Spring, 3-11.
19. Gordon, P., and P. Richardson. 1997. Are compact cities a desirable goal? Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (1): 95-106.
20. Handy, S. L., Lisa Weston, Jumin Song, K. Maria D. Lane, and Jennifer Terry. 2002. The education of transportation planning professionals. Austin, TX: Southwest Regional University Transportation Center.
21. Levine, J. 1999. Access to choice. Access 14:16-19.
22. Miller, Frank. 1990. Specialized land use curricula in urban planning graduate programs. Journal of Planning Education and Research 9 (3): 203-6.
23. Mitchell, R. B., and C. Rapkin. 1954. Urban traffic: A function of land use. New York: Columbia University Press.
24. Montagu, A. S. 2001. Repackaging the revolution: Making GIS instruction relevant to planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 (2): 184-95.
25. Moore, T. 1996. Premises and promises: Putting the transportation-land use relationship in context. TR News, pp. 7-8.
26. Moore, T., and P. Thorsnes. 1994. The transportation/land use connection. Planning Advisory Service Report nos. 448/449. Chicago: American Planning Association.
27. Morris, M. 1996. Creating transit supportive land use regulations. Chicago: American Planning Association.
28. Moudon, A. V. 1995. Teaching urban form. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 (2): 123-33.
29. Niebanck, P. L. 1988. Planning education: Unleashing the future. Journal of the American Planning Association 54 (4): 432-42.
30. 1000 Friends of Oregon. 1993. Making the land use transportation air quality connection. Vol. 4A, The pedestrian environment. Portland, OR: LUTRAQ, with Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Calthorpe Associates, and Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade and Douglas.
31. Ozawa, Ethan P. 1999. Taking our bearings: Mapping a relationship among planning practice, theory, and education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18 (3): 257-66.
32. Pew Center for Civic Journalism. 2000. Straight talk from Americans. Retrieved from http://www.pewcenter.org/doingcj/research/r_ST2000.html.
33. Pezzoli, Deborah. 2001. Planning pedagogy and globalization: A content analysis of syllabi. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20 (3): 365-75.
34. Pushkarev, B., and J. Zupan. 1977. Public transportation and land use policy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35. Rodriguez, S. 1993. Schools for today, graduates for tomorrow. Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (2): 152-55.
36. Seltzer, E., and C. P. Ozawa. 2002. Clear signals: Moving on to planning's promise. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22:77-86.
37. Stiftel, B. 1991. Introduction. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20 (4): 397-447.
38. Washington, R. O., and D. Strong. 1997. A model for teaching environmental justice in a planning curriculum. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16:280-90.