Framing the user experience: Information biases on website quality judgement

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 855-864

  Hartmann, Jan ^a   De Angeli, Antonella ^a   Sutcliffe, Alistair ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Framing effect; Judgement and decision making; Quality models; User experience

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PROGRAMMING THEORY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; FRAMING EFFECT; HCI DESIGNS; INFORMATION BIAS; JUDGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; QUALITY MODELS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCES; SYSTEM QUALITIES; USER EXPERIENCE; USER JUDGEMENTS; WEB SITE QUALITIES;

INTERNET;

EID: 57649234029     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357190     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Beach, L.R., Puto, C.P., Heckler, S.E., Naylor, G. and Marble, T.A. Differential versus unit weighting of violations, framing, and the role of probability in image theory's compatibility test. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 65 (1996), 77-82.
2. De Angeli, A., Sutcliffe, A. and Hartmann, J., Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences? in Proc. DIS 2006, ACM Press (2006), 271-280.
3. Forlizzi, J. and Battarbee, K., Understanding experience in interactive systems. in Proc. DIS 2004, ACM Press (2004).
4. Hartmann, J., Assessing the Attractiveness of Interactive Systems. in Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006).
5. Hartmann, J. and Sutcliffe, A., A framework for judgement of quality of interactive systems. in Proc. 2nd International Open Workshop on User Experience - Towards a unified View at NordiCHI2006
6. Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A. and De Angeli, A., Investigating Attractiveness in Web User Interfaces. in Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007).
7. Hassenzahl, M. The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13, 4 (2001), 481-499.
8. Hassenzahl, M. The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship between User and Product. in Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F. and Wright, P.C. eds. Funology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
9. Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N. User Experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 91-97.
10. Jordan, P. Designing Pleasurable Products. Taylor & Francis, New York, NY, 2000.
11. Karlsson, M. Expressions, Emotions, and website design. CoDesign, 3, 1 (2007), 75-89.
12. Kim, J., Lee, J. and Choi, D. Designing Emotionally Evocative Homepages: An Empirical Study of the Quantative Relations Between Design Factors and Emotional Dimensions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 6 (2003), 899-940.
13. Lai, Y.-L. and Hui, K.-L., Internet Opt-In and Opt-Out: Investigating the Roles of Frames, Defaults and Privacy Concerns. in Proc. SIGMIS-CPR'06 (2006).
14. Lavie, T. and Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 60 (2004), 269-298.
15. Levin, I.P. Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25 (1987), 85-86.
16. Levin, I.P. and Gaeth, G.J. How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 3 (1988), 374-378.
17. Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L. and Gaeth, G.J. All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 76, 2 (1998), 149-188.
18. Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C. and Brown, J. Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & Information Technology, 25, 2 (2006), 115-126.
19. Linville, P.W., Fischer, G.W. and Fischhoff, B. AIDS risk perceptions and decision biases, in Pryor, J.B. and Reeder, G.D. eds. The social psychology of HIV infection, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, 5-38.
20. Loftus. A framework for a theory of picture recognition, in Monty, R.A. and Senders, J.W. eds. Eye movements and psychological processes, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
21. Löwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
22. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004.
23. Meyerowitz, B.E. and Chaiken, S. The effect of message framing onbreast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (1987), 500-510.
24. Norman, D.A. Emotional Design. Basic Books, New York, NY, 2004.
25. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993.
26. Schneider, S.L. Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18 (1992).
27. Sutcliffe, A. and De Angeli, A., Assessing Interaction Styles in Web User Interfaces. in Proc. Interact 2005.
28. Tractinsky, N., Toward the Study of Aesthetics in Information Technology, in Proc. ICIS 2004.
29. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (1981).
30. van der Heijden, H. Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40 (2003).