On the Possibility of Unification: The Reality and Nature of the Crisis in Psychology

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 829-852

  Goertzen, Jason R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

crisis; disunity; fragmentation; unification; unity

Indexed keywords

EID: 57649230764     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354308097260     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Altman, I. (1987). Centripetal and centrifugal trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 42, 1058-1069.
2. Baars, B. (1984). View from a road not taken. Contemporary Psychology, 29, 804-805.
3. Baars, B. (1985a). And once more ‘round the mulberry bush. Contemporary Psychology, 30, 421.
4. Baars, B. (1985b). The logic of unification. Contemporary Psychology, 30, 340.
5. Bakan, D. (1996). The crisis in psychology. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5, 335-342.
6. Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
7. Bower, G.H. (1993). The fragmentation of psychology? American Psychologist, 48, 905-907.
8. Bühler, K. (1927). Die krise der psychologie [The crisis of psychology]. Jena, Germany: Verlag von Gustav Fischer.
9. Church, R.M. (1990). Two approaches to the unification of academic psychology. International Newsletter of Uninomic Psychology, 10, 14-24.
10. Conway, J.B. (1992). A world of differences among psychologists. Canadian Psychology, 33, 1-24.
11. de Groot, A.D. (1990). Unifying psychology: Its preconditions. In W.J. Baker, M.E. Hyland, R. van Hezewijk, & S. Terwee (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-25). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Derksen, M. (2005). Against integration: Why evolution cannot unify the social sciences. Theory & Psychology, 15, 139-162.
13. Dixon, R.A. (1983). Theoretical proliferation in psychology: A plea for sustained disunity. The Psychological Record, 33, 337-340.
14. Drob, S.L. (2003). Fragmentation in contemporary psychology: A dialectical solution. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(4), 102-123.
15. Eifert, G.H. (1985). Rewards for fragmentation. International Newsletter of Paradigmatic Psychology, 1, 19.
16. Faye, C. (2005). Gabriel Tarde, Émile Durkheim, and the chronic ‘crisis’ in social psychology. Unpublished master's thesis, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
17. Fishman, D.B. (1987). Unification in psychology: Epistemological prerequisites. International Newsletter of Uninomic Psychology, 3, 25-34.
18. Gardner, H. (1992). Scientific psychology: Should we bury it or praise it? New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 179-190.
19. Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275.
20. Gergen, K.J. (1988). United we fall: A response to Krantz. New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 219-222.
21. Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. New York: Harper & Row.
22. Giorgi, A. (1974). The metapsychology of Merleau-Ponty as a possible basis for unity in psychology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 5, 53-74.
23. Giorgi, A. (1984). Towards a new paradigm for psychology. Studies in the Social Sciences, 23, 9-28.
24. Giorgi, A. (1985). Theoretical plurality and unity in psychology. The Psychological Record, 35, 177-181.
25. Giorgi, A. (2000). Psychology as a human science revisited. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40(3), 56-73.
26. Gladin, L.L. (1961). Toward a unified psychology. Psychological Record, 11, 405-421.
27. Goertzen, J.R. (2005). The identity of psychology: A qualitative exploration and a descriptive account of the crisis and unification literature. Unpublished master's thesis, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
28. Gruber, H.E., & Gruber, S.L. (1996). Where is the crisis in psychology? Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5, 347-352.
29. Henriques, G. (2003). The Tree of Knowledge System and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7, 150-182.
30. Henriques, G.R. (Ed.). (2004a). Defining psychology: Articles and commentaries on a new unified theory (Part 1) [Special issue]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(12).
31. Henriques, G.R. (2004b). Psychology defined. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1207-1221.
32. Henriques, G.R. (Ed.). (2005a). Defining psychology: Articles and commentaries on a new unified theory (Part 2) [Special issue]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(1).
33. Henriques, G.R. (2005b). Toward a useful mass movement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 121-139.
34. Henriques, G.R. (2008). The problem of psychology and the integration of human knowledge: Contrasting Wilson's consilience with the Tree of Knowledge System. Theory & Psychology, 18, 731-755.
35. Hoshmand, L.T., & Martin, J. (1994). Naturalizing the epistemology of psychological research. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 14, 171-189.
36. Kantor, J.R. (1922). Can the psychophysical experiment reconcile introspectionists and objectivists? American Journal of Psychology, 33, 481-510.
37. Kantor, J.R. (1979). Psychology: Science or nonscience? The Psychological Record, 29, 155-163.
38. Kassinove, J.I. (2002). As defined, unification is inevitable. American Psychologist, 57, 1127.
39. Kelly, R.J. (1998). The crisis in psychology: Trouble in the temple. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 7, 211-223.
40. Kendler, H.H. (1970). The unity of psychology. Canadian Psychologist, 11, 30-47.
41. Kendler, H.H. (1981). Psychology: A science in conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Kendler, H.H. (1987). A good divorce is better than a bad marriage. In A.W. Staats & L.P. Mos (Eds.), The annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 55-89). New York: Plenum.
43. Kimble, G.A. (1984). Psychology's two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833-839.
44. Klüver, A. (1949). On the impending dismemberment of psychology. Journal of Psychology, 28, 383-410.
45. Koch, S. (1961). Psychological science versus the science-humanism antinomy: Intimations of a significant science of man. American Psychologist, 16, 629-639.
46. Koch, S. (1969, September). Psychology cannot be a coherent science. Psychology Today, 3(4), 14, 64-68.
47. Koch, S. (1974). Psychology as science. In S.C. Brown (Ed.), Philosophy of psychology (pp. 3-41). London: Macmillan.
48. Koch, S. (1976). Language communities, search cells, and the psychological studies. In W.J. Arnold (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 23. The Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1975 (pp. 477-559). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
49. Koch, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua ‘science’. American Psychologist, 36, 257-269.
50. Koch, S. (1993). ‘Psychology’ or ‘the psychological studies’? American Psychologist, 48, 902-904.
51. Kristensen, K.B., Slife, B.D., & Yanchar, S.C. (2000). On what basis are evaluations possible in a fragmented psychology? An alternative to objectivism and relativism. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21, 273-288.
52. Kunkel, J.H. (1985). Toward integration in psychology. International Newsletter of Paradigmatic Psychology, 1, 7-9.
53. Lévy-Leboyer, C. (Ed.). (1992). Unité ou diversité de la psychologie [Unity or diversity of psychology; Special Issue]. International Journal of Psychology, 27(5).
54. MacIntyre, R.B. (1985). Psychology's fragmentation and suggested remedies. International Newsletter of Paradigmatic Psychology, 1, 20-21.
55. Maher, B.A. (1985). Underpinnings of today's chaotic diversity. International Newsletter of Paradigmatic Psychology, 1, 17-19.
56. Matarazzo, J.D. (1987). There is only one psychology, no specialties, but many applications. American Psychologist, 42, 893-903.
57. Matarazzo, J.D. (1992). The unity or diversity of psychology: Concluding remarks. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 327-330.
58. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Neisser, U. (1995). The unity of psychology and of persons. International Newsletter of Uninomic Psychology, 15, 6-12.
60. O'Connell, D.C. (1996). Die krise der psychologie? [The crisis of psychology?] Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5, 343-345.
61. Overmeier, J.B. (1989). Uninomics and learning theory. International Newsletter of Uninomic Psychology, 8, 10-14.
62. Perlman, D. (2005, Summer). Better together: A CPA presidential theme for 2005-2006. Psynopsis, 27(3), 2.
63. Rabinowitz, V.C., & Weseen, S. (1997). Elu(ci)d(at)ing epistemological impasses: Re-viewing the qualitative/quantitative debates in psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 605-630.
64. Rappard, H. van. (1987). Preliminary thoughts on history and systems. International Newsletter of Uninomic Psychology, 3, 11-16.
65. Rieber, R.W. (Ed.). (1996). Special section on crisis in psychology [Special section]. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5(4).
66. Royce, J.R. (1977). Toward an indigenous philosophy of psychology. The Ontario Psychologist, 9, 16-32.
67. Royce, J.R. (1978). How we can best advance the construction of theory in psychology. Canadian Psychological Review, 19, 259-276.
68. Royce, J.R. (1985). The problem of theoretical pluralism in psychology. In K.B. Madsen & L.P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 297-311). New York: Plenum.
69. Royce, J.R. (1987a). A strategy for developing unifying theory in psychology. In A.W. Staats & L.P. Mos (Eds.), The annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 275-286). New York: Plenum.
70. Royce, J.R. (1987b). More order than a telephone book? A response to Krantz. New Ideas in Psychology, 5, 341.
71. Sarason, S.B. (1981). Psychology misdirected. New York: Free Press.
72. Scott, T.R. (1991). A personal view of the future of psychology departments. American Psychologist, 46, 975-976.
73. Spence, J.T. (1987). Centrifugal versus centripetal tendencies in psychology: Will the center hold? American Psychologist, 42, 1052-1054.
74. Staats, A.W. (1983). Psychology's crisis of disunity: Philosophy and method for a unified science. New York: Praeger.
75. Staats, A.W. (1991). Unified positivism and unification psychology: Fad or new field? American Psychologist, 46, 899-912.
76. Staats, A.W. (1996). Behavior and personality: Psychological behaviorism. New York: Springer.
77. Staats, A.W. (1999). Unifying psychology requires new infrastructure, theory, method, and a research agenda. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 3-13.
78. Staats, A.W. (2004). The disunity-unity dimension. American Psychologist, 59, 273.
79. Stam, H.J. (2004). Unifying psychology: Epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1259-1262.
80. Sternberg, R.J. (2003). Unify! Monitor on Psychology, 34(2), 5.
81. Sternberg, R.J. (2005). Unifying the field of psychology. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Unity in psychology: Possibility or pipedream? (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
82. Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2001). Unified psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 1069-1079.
83. Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). E pluribus unum. American Psychologist, 57, 1129-1130.
84. Steup, M., & Sosa, E. (2005). Contemporary debates in epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
85. Teo, T. (1999). Functions of knowledge in psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 17, 1-15.
86. Teo, T. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. New York: Springer.
87. Thorngate, W. (1990a). Got a minute? Attentional limits revisited. Canadian Psychology, 31, 288-291.
88. Thorngate, W. (1990b). The economy of attention and the development of psychology. Canadian Psychology, 31, 262-271.
89. Tolman, C.W. (1988). Theoretical unification in psychology: A materialist perspective. In L.P. Mos, W.J. Baker, H.V. Rappard, & H.J. Stam (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 29-36). New York: Springer-Verlag.
90. Tolman, C.W., & Lemery, C.R. (1990). How to reconcile theoretical differences in psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 8, 397-402.
91. Vazire, S., & Robins, R.W. (2004). Beyond the Justification Hypothesis: A broader theory of the evolution of self-consciousness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1271-1273.
92. Viney, W. (1996). Disunity in psychology and other sciences: The network or the block universe? Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17, 31-43.
93. Vygotsky, L.S. (1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In R.W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 3, pp. 233-344). New York: Plenum. (Original work published 1927)
94. Wachtel, P.L. (1985). Need for theory. International Newsletter of Paradigmatic Psychology, 1, 15-17.
95. Wapner, S. (1988a). ‘How far can we go towards unifying psychology? Comments on Prof. Wapner's paper’: Reply. Hiroshima Forum for Psychology, 13, 19.
96. Wapner, S. (1988b). Unifying psychology: Strategies from a holistic, developmental, systems theory. Hiroshima Forum for Psychology, 13, 1-15.
97. Ward, S.C. (2002). Modernizing the mind: Psychological knowledge and the remaking of society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
98. Watson, R. (1967). Psychology: A prescriptive science. American Psychologist, 22, 435-443.
99. Wertheimer, M. (1972). Fundamental issues in psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
100. Wilber, K. (1999). The collected works of Ken Wilber (Vol. 6). Boston: Shambhala.
101. Wilber, K. (2006). Integral spirituality. Boston: Integral Books.
102. Willy, R. (1899). Die krisis in der psychologie [The crisis in psychology]. Leipzig, Germany: O.R. Reisland.
103. Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.
104. Wittig, A.F. (1985). Reflection on unity-disunity by a general psychologist. International Newsletter of Paradigmatic Psychology, 1, 13-15.
105. Yanchar, S.C. (1997a). Fragmentation in focus: History, integration, and the project of evaluation. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 17, 150-169.
106. Yanchar, S.C. (1997b). William James and the challenge of methodological pluralism. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 18, 425-442.
107. Yanchar, S.C. (1998). [Review of the book Behavior and personality: Psychological behaviorism]. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 18, 61-69.
108. Yanchar, S.C., & Hill, J.R. (2003). What is psychology about? Toward an explicit ontology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43, 11-32.
109. Yanchar, S.C., & Kristensen, K.B. (1996a). Notes on a naturalized epistemology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 16, 93-101.
110. Yanchar, S.C., & Kristensen, K.B. (1996b). On starting points and priorities: A rejoinder. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 16, 111-122.
111. Yanchar, S.C., & Slife, B.D. (1997). Pursuing unity in a fragmented psychology: Problems and prospects. Review of General Psychology, 1, 235-255.
112. Yanchar, S.C., & Slife, B.D. (2000a). Putting it all together: Toward a hermeneutic unity of psychology. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21, 315-326.
113. Yanchar, S.C., & Slife, B.D. (2000b). The problematic of fragmentation: A hermeneutic proposal. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21, 235-242.
114. Yanchar, S.C., & Slife, B.D. (Eds.). (2000c). The problematic of fragmentation: An hermeneutic proposal [Special issue]. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21(3).