Correction (DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.056);Allergic patch test reactions associated with cosmetics: Retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001-2004

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 23-38

  Warshaw, Erin M ^a   Buchholz, Heather J ^a   Belsito, Donald V ^b   Maibach, Howard I ^c   Fowler Jr , Joseph F ^d   Rietschel, Robert L ^e   Zug, Kathryn A ^f   Mathias, C G Toby ^g   Pratt, Melanie D ⁱ   Sasseville, Denis ^j   Storrs, Frances J ^k   Taylor, James S ^h   DeLeo, Vincent A ^l   Marks Jr , James G ^m  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b American Dermatology Associates   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^f DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^j ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^k OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^m PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; COSMETIC;

ALLERGIC REACTION; ARTICLE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORTH AMERICA; OCCUPATIONAL ALLERGY; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 57649221939     PISSN: 01909622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (104)

1. Is it a cosmetic, a drug, or both? (Or is it soap?) Available at: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼dms/cos-218.html. Accessed April 20, 2008.
2. Meadows M. A century of ensuring safe foods and cosmetics. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2006/106_cfsan.html. Accessed April 20, 2008.
3. Menkart J. An analysis of adverse reactions to cosmetics. Cutis 24 (1979) 599, 662
4. Emmons W.W., and Marks Jr. J.G. Immediate and delayed reactions to cosmetic ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 13 (1985) 258-265
5. Skog E. Incidence of cosmetic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 6 (1980) 449-451
6. Romaguera C., Camarasa J.M.G., Alomar A., and Grimalt F. Patch tests with allergens related to cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 6 (1983) 167-168
7. DeGroot A.C. Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 17 (1987) 26-34
8. Eiermann H.J., Larsen W., Maibach H.I., and Taylor J.S. Prospective study of cosmetic reactions: 1977-1980. J Am Acad Dermatol 6 (1982) 909-917
9. Adams R.M., and Maibach H.I. A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 13 (1985) 1062-1069
10. Wolf R., Wolf D., Tüzün B., and Tüzün Y. Contact dermatitis to cosmetics. Clin Dermatol 19 (2001) 502-515
11. Nielsen N.H., and Menné T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol 72 (1992) 456-460
12. Nielsen N.H., Linneberg A., Menné T., Madsen F., Frølund L., Dirksen A., et al. Allergic contact sensitization in an adult Danish population: two cross-sectional surveys eight years apart (The Copenhagen Allergy Study). Acta Derm Venereol 81 (2001) 31-34
13. Kohl L., Blondeel A., and Song M. Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics: retrospective analysis of 819 patch-tested patients. Dermatology 204 (2002) 334-337
14. Biebl K., and Warshaw E.M. Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics. Dermatol Clin 24 (2006) 215-232
15. Orton D.I., and Wilkinson J.D. Cosmetic allergy: incidence, diagnosis and management. Am J Clin Dermatol 5 (2004) 327-337
16. Penchalaiah K., Handa S., Lakshmi S.B., Sharma V.K., and Kumar B. Sensitizers commonly causing allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 43 (2000) 311-313
17. Pratt M.D., Belsito D.V., DeLeo V.A., Fowler Jr. J.F., Fransway A.F., Maibach H.I., et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 176-183 Erratum in: Dermatitis 2005;16:106
18. Marks J.G., Belsito D.V., DeLeo V.A., Fowler Jr. J.F., Fransway A.F., Maibach H.I., et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 38 (1998) 911-918
19. U.S. Census Bureau. Industry and Occupation 2000. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/ioindex/cens_300_354.html. Accessed September 25, 2007.
20. Bourrain J.L. Occupational contact urticaria. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 30 (2006) 39-46
21. Jacob S.E., and Zapolanski T. Systemic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 19 (2008) 9-15
22. Angelini G., Foti C., Rigano L., and Vena G.A. 3-Dimethylaminopropylamine: a key substance in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine?. Contact Dermatitis 32 (1995) 96-99
23. Iorizzo M., Parente G., Vincenzi C., Pazzaglia M., and Tosti A. Allergic contact dermatitis in hairdressers: frequency and source of sensitisation. Eur J Dermatol 12 (2002) 179-182
24. Valks R., Conde-Salazar L., Malfeito J., and Ledo S. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers, 10 years later: patch-test results in 300 hairdressers (1994 to 2003) and comparison with previous study. Dermatitis 16 (2005) 28-31
25. DeGroot A.C., Bruynzeel D.P., Bos J.D., van der Meeren H.L.M., van Joost T., Jagtman B.A., et al. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 1249 (1988) 1525-1529
26. Goossens A., Beck M.H., Haneke E., McFadden J.P., Nolting S., Durupt G., et al. Adverse cutaneous reactions to cosmetic allergens. Contact Dermatitis 40 (1999) 112-113
27. Rastogi S.C. Analytical control of preservative labeling on skin creams. Contact Dermatitis 43 (2000) 339-343
28. Fisher A.A. Dermatitis due to formaldehyde-releasing agents in cosmetics and medicaments. Cutis 22 (1978) 655, 658, 662, 664, 708
29. Rietschel R.L., Warshaw E.M., Sasseville D., Fowler Jr. J.F., DeLeo V.A., Belsito D.V., et al. Sensitivity of petrolatum and aqueous vehicles for detecting allergy to imidazolidinylurea, diazolidinylurea, and DMDM hydantoin: a retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Dermatitis 18 (2007) 155-162
30. Brancaccio R.R. What's new in contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 4 (1993) 55-57
31. Kantor G.R., Taylor J.S., Ratz R.L., and Evey P.L. Acute allergic contact dermatitis from diazolidinyl urea (Germall II) in a hair gel. J Am Acad Dermatol 13 (1985) 116-119
32. Hasan T., Rantanen T., Alanko K., Harvima R.J., Jolanki R., Kalimo K., et al. Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland-a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 53 (2005) 40-45
33. DeGroot A.C., van Joost T., Bos J.D., van der Meeren H.L.M., and Weyland J.W. Patch test reactivity to DMDM hydantoin. Contact Dermatitis 18 (1988) 197-201
34. Larsen W.G., Jackson E.M., Barker M.D., Bednarz R.M., Engasser P.G., O'Donoghue M.N., et al. A primer on cosmetics. J Am Acad Dermatol 27 (1992) 469-484
35. Dooms-Goossens A., de Boulle K., Dooms M., and Degreef H. Imidazolidinyl urea dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 14 (1986) 322-324
36. Storrs F.J., and Bell D.E. Allergic contact dermatitis to 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol in a hydrophilic ointment. J Am Acad Dermatol 8 (1983) 157-170
37. Fisher A.A. Cosmetic dermatitis part II. Reactions to some commonly used preservatives. Cutis 26 (1980) 136-137 141-2, 147-8
38. Malten K.E., van Ketel W.G., Nater J.P., and Liem D.H. Reactions in selected patients to 22 fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 11 (1984) 1-10
39. Devos S.A., Constandt L., Tupker R.A., Noz K.C., Lucker G.P., Bruynzeel D.P., et al. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix. Dermatitis 19 (2008) 43-47
40. Rastogi S.C., Menné T., and Johansen J.D. The composition of fine fragrances is changing. Contact Dermatitis 48 (2003) 130-132
41. Larsen W., Nakayama H., Lindberg M., Fischer T., Elsner P., Burrows D., et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (part I). Am J Contact Dermatitis 7 (1996) 77-83
42. Frosch P.J., Johansen J.D., Menné T., Rastogi S.C., Bruze M., Andersen K.E., et al. Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 141 (1999) 1076-1083
43. Frosch P.J., Pirker C., Rastogi S.C., Andersen K.E., Bruze M., Svedman C., et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 52 (2005) 207-215
44. DeGroot A.C., van Ginkel C.J.W., and Weijland J.W. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (Euxyl K 400): an important "new" allergen in cosmetics. J Am Acad Dermatol 35 (1996) 743-747
45. McFadden J.P., Ross J.S., Jones A.B., Rycroft R.J.G., Smith H.R., and White I.R. Increased rate of patch test reactivity to methyldibromo glutaronitrile. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000) 54-55
46. de Groot A.C., de Cock P.A., Coenraads P.J., van Ginkel C.J.W., Jagtman B.A., van Joost T., et al. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile is an important contact allergen in The Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 34 (1996) 118-120
47. Marks Jr. J.G., Moss J.N., Parno J.R., Adams R.M., Belsito D.V., DeLeo V.A., et al. Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) biocide: second United States multicenter study of human skin sensitization. Am J Contact Dermatitis 4 (1993) 87-89
48. Wilkinson J.D., Shaw S., Andersen K.E., Brandao F.M., Bruynzeel D.P., Bruze M., et al. Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991-2000). Contact Dermatitis 46 (2002) 207-210
49. Cashman A.L., and Warshaw E.M. Parabens: a review of epidemiology, structure, allergenicity, and hormonal properties. Dermatitis 16 (2005) 57-66
50. Rastogi S.C., Schouten A., De Kruijf N., and Weijland J. Contents of methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, butyl- and benzylparaben in cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 32 (1995) 28-30
51. Menne T., and Hjorth N. Routine patch testing with paraben esters. Contact Dermatitis 19 (1988) 189-191
52. Uter W., Lessmann H., Geier J., and Schnuch A. Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients-an 8-year analysis of IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis 49 (2003) 236-240
53. Moreau L., and Sasseville D. Allergic contact dermatitis from cocamidopropyl betaine, cocamidoamine, 3-(dimethylamino)propylamine, and oleamidopropyl dimethylamine: co-reactions or cross-reactions?. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 146-149
54. Pigatto P.D., Bigardi A.S., and Cusano F. Contact dermatitis to cocamidopropylbetaine is caused by residual amines: relevance, clinical characteristics, and review of the literature. Am J Contact Dermatitis 6 (1995) 13-16
55. McFadden J.P., Ross J.S., White I.R., and Basketter D.A. Clinical allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine: reactivity to cocamidopropylamine and lack of reactivity to 3-dimethylaminopropylamine. Contact Dermatitis 45 (2001) 72-74
56. Fowler J.F., Fowler L.M., and Hunter J.E. Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: a patch test and product use test. Contact Dermatitis 37 (1997) 276-281
57. Shaffer K.K., Jaimes J.P., Hordinsky M.K., Zielke G.R., and Warshaw E.M. Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of coconut oil derivatives: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot study. Dermatitis 17 (2006) 71-76
58. Morrison L.H., and Storrs F.J. Persistence of an allergen in hair after glyceryl monothioglycolate-containing permanent wave solutions. J Am Acad Dermatol 19 (1988) 52-59
59. Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., and Fisher A.A. Fisher's contact dermatitis. 5th ed. (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia: PA
60. Tosti A., Melino M., and Bardazzi F. Contact dermatitis due to glyceryl monothioglycolate. Contact Dermatitis 19 (1988) 71-72
61. Engasser P.G. Cosmetics and contact dermatitis. Dermatol Clin 9 (1991) 69-80
62. Dooms-Goosens A., Degreef H., and Luytens E. Dihydroabietyl alcohol (Abitol ®). A sensitizer in mascara. Contact Dermatitis 5 (1979) 350-353
63. Fisher A.A. Allergic contact dermatitis to rosin (colophony) in eyeshadow and mascara. Cutis 42 (1988) 507-508
64. Batta K., Bourke J.K., and Foulds I.S. Allergic contact dermatitis from colophony in lipsticks. Contact Dermatitis 36 (1997) 171-172
65. Fan W., Kinnunen T., Niinimäki A., and Hannuksela M. Skin reactions to glycols used in dermatologic amd cosmetic vehicles. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2 (1991) 181-183
66. Wahlberg J.E., and Nilsson G. Skin irritancy from propylene glycol. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 64 (1984) 286-290
67. Willis C.M., Stephens J.M., and Wilkinson J.D. Experimentally induced irritant contact dermatitis: determination of optimum irritant concentrations. Contact Dermatitis 18 (1988) 20-24
68. Zesch A. Skin irritation by topical drugs. Derm Beruf Umwelt 31 (1983) 74-78
69. Andersen K.E., and Storrs F.J. Skin irritation caused by propylene glycols. Hautarzt 33 (1982) 12-14
70. Frosch P.J., Pekar U., and Enzmann H. Contact allergy to propylene glycol. Do we use the appropriate test concentration?. Dermatol Clin 8 (1990) 111-113
71. Lahti A., Poutianen A.-M., and Hannuksela M. Alcohol vehicles in tests for non-immunological immediate contact reactions. Contact Dermatitis 29 (1993) 22-25
72. Hannuksela M., and Salo H. The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 14 (1986) 221-227
73. Funk J.O., and Maibach H.I. Propylene glycol dermatitis: re-evaluation of an old problem. Contact Dermatitis 31 (1994) 236-241
74. Kerre S. Allergic contact dermatitis to pentylene glycol in a cosmetic cream. Contact Dermatitis 58 (2008) 122-123
75. Kuznetsov A.V., Erlenkeuser-Uebelhoer I., and Thomas P. Contact allergy to propylene glycol and dodecyl gallate mimicking seborrheic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 55 (2006) 307-308
76. Lee B., and Warshaw E.M. Lanolin allergy: a review of history, epidemiology, responsible allergens, and management. Dermatitis 19 (2008) 63-72
77. Yokota M., Thong H.-Y., Hoffman C.A., and Maibach H.I. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by tosylamide formaldehyde resin in nail varnish: an old allergen that has not disappeared. Contact Dermatitis 57 (2007) 277
78. Lidén C., Berg M., Färm G., and Wrangsjö K. Nail varnish allergy with far-reaching consequences. Br J Dermatol 128 (1993) 57-62
79. Thorne N. Nail varnish. Br J Clin Pract 17 (1963) 479-482
80. Guin J.D. Eyelid dermatitis: a report of 215 patients. Contact Dermatitis 50 (2004) 87-90
81. Staines K.S., Felix D.H., and Forsyth A. Desquamative gingivitis, sole manifestation of tosylamide/formaldehyde resin allergy. Contact Dermatitis 39 (1998) 90
82. Fisher A.A. Allergic sensitization of the skin and oral mucosa to acrylic denture materials. JAMA 156 (1954) 238
83. Romaguera C., Vilaplana J., Grimalt F., and Ferrando J. Contact sensitivity to meth(acrylates) in a limb prosthesis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1 (1990) 183-185
84. Draelos Z.D. Nail cosmetic issues. Dermatol Clin 18 (2000) 675-683
85. CFSAN/Office of Cosmetics and Colors. Methacrylate monomers in artificial nails. Available at: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼dms/cos-nail.html#mono. Accessed May 10, 2008.
86. Mowad C., and Ferringer T. Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates in artificial nails. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 51-53
87. Teik-Jin Goon A., Bruze M., Zimerson E., Goh C.L., and Isaksson M. Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis 57 (2007) 21-27
88. Lazarov A. Sensitization to acrylates is a common adverse reaction to artificial fingernails. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21 (2007) 169-174
89. Rietschel RL Experience with supplemental allergens in the diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Cutis 65 (2000) 27-30
90. Koppula S.V., Fellman J.H., and Storrs F.J. Screening allergens for acrylate dermatitis associated with artificial nails. Am J Contact Dermatitis 6 (1995) 78-85
91. Perrenoud D., Homberger H.P., Auderset P.C., Emmenegger R., Frenk E., Saurat J.H., et al. An epidemic outbreak of papular and follicular contact dermatitis to tocopheryl linoleate in cosmetics. Swiss Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Dermatology 189 (1994) 225-233
92. Goldman M.P., and Rapaport M. Contact dermatitis to vitamin E oil. J Am Acad Dermatol 14 (1986) 133-134
93. Bryld L.E., Agner T., and Menné T. Allergic contact dermatitis from 3-iodo-2-propynyl-butylcarbamate (IPBC)-an update. Contact Dermatitis 44 (2001) 276-278
94. Pazzaglia M., and Tosti A. Allergic contact dermatitis from 3-iodo-2-propynyl-butylcarbamate in a cosmetic cream. Contact Dermatitis 41 (1999) 290-304
95. Badreshia S., and Marks Jr. J.G. Iodopropynyl butylcarbamate. Am J Contact Dermatitis 13 (2002) 77-79
96. Fisher A.A. Allergic contact dermatitis (caused by rubber cosmetic sponges) simulating cosmetic dermatitis. Cutis 51 (1993) 320-321
97. Uter W., Balzer C., Geier J., Frosch P.J., and Schnuch A. Patch testing with patients' own cosmetics and toiletries-results of the IVDK, 1998-2002. Contact Dermatitis 53 (2005) 226-233
98. Roed-Petersen J., and Hjorth N. Contact dermatitis from antioxidants. Br J Dermatol 94 (1976) 233-241
99. White I.R., Lovell C.R., and Cronin E. Antioxidants in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 11 (1984) 265-267
100. Giordano-Labadie F., Schwarze H.P., and Bazex J. Allergic contact dermatitis from octyl gallate in a lipstick. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000) 51
101. Wilson A.G., White I.R., and Kirby J.D. Allergic contact dermatitis from propyl gallate in lip balm. Contact Dermatitis 20 (1989) 145-146
102. Cronin E. Lipstick dermatitis due to propyl gallate. Contact Dermatitis 6 (1980) 213
103. Serra-Baldrich E., Puig L.L., Gimenez Arnau A., and Camarasa J.G. Lipstick allergic contact dermatitis from gallates. Contact Dermatitis 32 (1995) 359-372
104. Walgrave S.E., Warshaw E.M., and Glesne L.A. Allergic contact dermatitis to propolis. Dermatitis 16 (2005) 209-215