A computational model for spatial expression resolution

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 240-246

  Corradini, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Machine learning; Psycholinguistic study; Spatial expressions

Indexed keywords

GAME THEORY; INFORMATION THEORY; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; ROBOT LEARNING;

COMPUTATIONAL MODELS; CONTEXTUAL INFORMATIONS; MACHINE LEARNING; MACHINE-LEARNING TECHNIQUES; POTENTIAL FIELDS; PSYCHOLINGUISTIC STUDY; PUZZLE GAMES; SPATIAL EXPRESSIONS; SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 57649217433     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1322192.1322234     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Bateman, J., Fischer, K., and Tenbrink, T. Why a staticinterpretation is not sufficient in spatial communication. Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Dialogue Systems: Interaction, Adaptation and Styles of Management, 2003.
2. Baus, J., and Kray, C. Frames of Reference, Positional Information and Navigational Assistance. Proceedings of the 15th International AAAI FLAIRS Conf, pp. 461-465, 2002.
3. Bohus, D., and Rudnicky, A. Sorry, I Didn't Catch That! An Investigation of Non-understanding Errors and Recovery Strategies. Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Lisbon, Portugal, 2005.
4. Brenner, M., Hawes, N., Kelleher, J., and Wyatt, J. Mediating between Qualitative and Quantitative Representations for Task-Oriented Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Hyderabad, India, 2007.
5. Byron, D.K., and Stoia, L. An Analysis of Proximity Markers in Collaborative Dialog. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 2005.
6. Carbonell, J.G. Discourse pragmatics and ellipsis resolution in task-oriented natural language interfaces. Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 164-168, 1983.
7. Corradini, A., Hanneforth, T., Bak, A. A Robust Spoken Language Architecture to Control a 2D Game. Proc. of the AAAI International FLAIRS Conference, Key West, FL, USA, pp. 199-204, 2007.
8. Costello, F., and Kelleher, J. Spatial prepositions in context: The semantics of near in the presence of distractor objects. Proceedings of the ACL-Sigsem Workshop on Prepositions, 2006.
9. Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G., and Randell, D.A. Qualitative Simulation Based on a Logical Formalism of Space and Time. Proceedings of 10th National Conference of the AAAI, 1992.
10. Engenhofer, M.J. Reasoning about Binary Topological Relations. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Advances in Spatial Databases, pp. 143-160, 1991.
11. Egenhofer, M.J., and Shariff, A. Metric Details for Natural Language Spatial Relations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16:(4), pp.295-321, 1998.
12. Eschenbach, C. Metric Details for Natural Language Spatial Relations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16:(4), pp.295-321, 1999.
13. Fernández, R., Corradini, A., Schlangen, D., and Stede, M. Towards Reducing and Managing Uncertainty in Spoken Dialogue Systems. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Computational Semantics, 2007.
14. Fischer, K., and Moratz, R. From Communicative Strategies to Cognitive Modeling. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics, 2001.
15. Gorniak, P., and Roy, D. Grounded Semantic Composition for Visual Scenes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Vol. 21, pp. 429-470, 2004.
16. Gorniak, P., and Roy, D. Speaking with your Sidekick: Understanding Situated Speech in Computer Role Playing Games. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Entertainment, 2005.
17. Gorniak, P., Orkin, J., and Roy, D. Speech, Space and Purpose: Situated Language Understanding in Computer Games. 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Workshop on Computer Games, 2006.
18. Kaiser, E., D., Olwal, McGee, A., Benko, H., Corradini, A., Li, X., Cohen, P.R., and Feiner, S. Mutual Disambiguation of 3D Multimodal Interaction in Augmented and Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the ACM 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Vancouver, Canada, BC, pp. 12-19, 2003.
19. Kelleher, J., Costello, F., and van Genabith, J. Dynamically structuring, updating and interrelating representations of visual and linguistic discourse context. Artificial Intelligence, Special volume on connecting language to the world, 167(1-2):62-102, 2005.
20. Kelleher, J., Kruijff, G.J., and Costello, F. Proximity in Context: an empirically grounded computational model of proximity for processing topological spatial expressions. Proceedings of the ACL COLING, 2006.
21. Krahmer, E., and Piwek, P. Presupposition Projection as Proof Construction. In: Bunt, H. & Muskens R. (eds.), Computing Meanings: Current issues in Computational Semantics, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 1999.
22. Kray, C., and Blocher, A. Modeling the Basic Meanings of Path Relations. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 384-393, 1999.
23. Krüger, A., and Maaß, W. Towards a Computational Semantics of Path Relations. Workshop on Language and Space at the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1997.
24. Lemon, O., Bracy, A., Gruenstein, A., and Peters, S. A Multi-Modal Dialogue System for Human-Robot Conversation. Proceedings of NAACL, 2001.
25. Levit, M., and Roy, D. Interpretation of Spatial Language in a Map Navigation Task IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2007.
26. Logan, D. and Sadler, D. A Computational Analysis of the Apprehension of Spatial Relations. In: Bloom, M. et al. (eds), Language and Space, MIT Press, 1996.
27. Moratz, R., Fischer, K., and Tenbrink, T. Cognitive Modeling of Spatial Reference for Human-Robot Interaction. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 10(4): 589-611, 2001.
28. Poesio, M., Start, P., Artstein, R., and Filik, R. Under specification and anaphora: Theoretical issues and preliminary evidence. Discourse Processes, 42(2): 157-175, 2006.
29. Regier, T., and Carlson, L. Grounding spatial language in perception: An empirical and computational investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2):273-298, 2001.
30. Roy, D. Gorniak, P., Mukherjee, N., and Juster, J. A Trainable Spoken Language Understanding System for Visual Object Selection. Proceedings of the ICSLP, 2002.
31. Roy, D. Learning Visually Grounded Words and Syntax for a Scene Description Task. Computer Speech and Language, 2002.
32. Roy, D., and Mukherjee, N. Towards situated speech understanding: Visual Context Priming of Language Models. Computer Speech and Language, 19(2):227-248, 2005.
33. Tapus, A., Vasudevan, S., and Siegwart, R. Towards a multilevel cognitive probabilistic representation of space. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 5666, pp. 39-48, 2005.
34. Webber, B., Stone, M., Joshi, A., and Knott, A. Anaphora and Discourse Structure. Computational Linguistics, 29(4), pp. 545-587, 2003.
35. Winograd, T. Procedures as a Representation for Data in a Computer Program for Understanding Natural Language. MIT AI Technical Report 235, 1971.