Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after aortic valve replacement using mechanical prostheses in patients with aortic stenosis

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 56, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 577-583

  Tsutsumi, Koji ^a,b   Nagumo, Masashi ^a   Nishikawa, Kuni ^a   Takahashi, Ryuichi ^a  

^a ASHIKAGA RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b Imperial Foundation Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Mechanical prosthesis; Survival

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEART FUNCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 57649202929     PISSN: 18636705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-008-0317-9     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. S.H. Rahimtoola 1978 The problem of prosthesis-patient mismatch Circulation 58 20 24
2. C. Blais J.G. Dumesnil R. Baillot S. Simard D. Doyle P. Pibarot 2003 Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement Circulation 108 983 988
3. P. Pibarot J.G. Dumesnil 2000 Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention J Am Coll Cardiol 36 1131 1141
4. A. Penta de Peppo J. Zeitani P. Nardi G. Iaci P. Polisca R. De Paulis 2005 Small functional size after mechanical aortic valve replacement: no risk in young to middle-age patients Ann Thorac Surg 79 1915 1920
5. B. Medalion E.H. Blackstone B.W. Lytle J.H. Arnold D.M. Cosgrove 2000 Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119 963 974
6. C.G. Koch F. Khandwala F.G. Estafanous F.D. Loop E.H. Blackstone 2005 Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement Circulation 111 3221 3229
7. R.G. Fuster J.A. Montero Argudo O.G. Albarova F.H. Sos S.C. Lopez M.B. Codoner 2005 Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27 441 449
8. M. Ruel H. Al-Faleh A. Kulik K.L. Chan T.G. Mesana I.G. Burwash 2006 Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 1036 1041
9. N. Vitale I. Caldarera C. Muneretto R. Sinatra A. Scafuri E. Di Rosa 2001 Clinical evaluation of St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus versus standard aortic valve prostheses; the Italian multicenter, prospective, randomized study J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122 691 698
10. D.S. Bach M. Goldbach M.P. Sakwa M. Petracek L. Errett F. Mohr 2001 Hemodynamics and early performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent aortic valve prosthesis J Heart Valve Dis 10 436 442
11. L.H. Edmunds Jr R.E. Clark L.H. Cohn G.L. Grunkemeier D.C. Miller R.D. Weisel 1996 Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations: the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity Ann Thorac Surg 62 932 935
12. K.E. Sommers T.E. David 1997 Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus Ann Thorac Surg 63 1608 1612