On the residential 'clubbisation' of French periurban municipalities

Urban Studies

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 189-212

  Charmes, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERIURBAN AREA; PRIVATE SECTOR; PUBLIC SECTOR; TERRITORIALITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 57649202248     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098008098642     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Baccaïni, B. (1998) Recent periurban growth in the Ile-de-France: forms and causes, Population: An English Selection, 10(2), pp. 349-384.
2. Berger, M. (2005) Les périurbains de Paris: De la ville dense à la métropole éclatée. Paris: Presses du CNRS.
3. Berger, M. (2006) Périurbanisation et accentuation des logiques ségrégatives en Ile-de-France, Hérodote, 122(3), pp. 198-211.
4. Berube, A., Singer, A., Wilson, J.H. and Frey, W.H. (2006) Finding exurbia: America's fast-growing communities at the metropolitan fringe. Living Cities Census Series, The Brookings Institution, Washinton, DC, October.
5. Bidou, C. (1984) Les aventuriers du quotidien: Essai sur les nouvelles classes moyennes. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
6. Blackmar, E. (2006) The tragedy of property rights discourse, in: S. Low and N. Smith (Eds) The Politics of Public Space, pp. 49-80. New York: Routledge.
7. Brevard, L. (2003) Les trajectoires d'insertion des nouveaux habitants à la périphérie des villes. PhD thesis, University of Toulouse -Le Mira il.
8. Buchanan, J.-M. (1965) An economic theory of clubs, Economica, New Series, 32(125), pp. 1-14.
9. Charmes, E. (2005) La vie périurbaine face à la menace des gated communities. Paris: L'Harmattan.
10. Charmes, E. (2006) Les petites communes périurbaines face aux nouvelles formes de l'entre-soi. Research report, Plan Urbanisme Construction Architecture, Paris.
11. Charmes, E. (2007a) Carte scolaire et clubbisation des petites communes périurbaines, Sociétés Contemporaines, 67, pp. 67-94.
12. Charmes, E. (2007b) Suburban fragmentation versus mobilities: Is suburbanism opposed to urbanism?, Cybergeo, article no. 369, March.
13. Chauvel, L. (2006) Les classes moyennes à la dérive. Paris: Seuil.
14. Chenu, A. and Tabard, N. (1993) Les transformations socioprofessionnelles du territoire français, 1982-1990, Population, 48(6), pp. 1735-1769.
15. Coase, R.H. (1974) The lighthouse in economics, Journal of Law and Economics, 17(2), pp. 357-376.
16. Dear, M. (1993) Comprendre et surmonter le syndrome NIMBY, 2001 Plus, 27, pp. 2-20.
17. Demouveaux, J.-P. (2004) Le droit de l'urbanisme au service de la ségrégation urbaine, in: F.-N. Buffet, L. Davezies, J.-P. Demouveaux et al. (Eds) Les mécanismes fonciers de la ségrégation, pp. 113 - 137. Paris: ADEF.
18. Donzelot, J. (2004) La ville à trois vitesses: relégation, périurbanisation, gentrification, Esprit, 303(March/April), pp. 14-39.
19. Dowding, K. and John, P. (1994) Tiebout: A survey of the empirical literature, Urban Studies, 31(4/5), pp. 767-798.
20. Esprit (2004) Table ronde la mixité urbaine estelle une politique?, Esprit, 303(March/April), pp. 121-142.
21. Estèbe, P. (2008) Gouverner la ville mobile. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
22. Filippi, B., Funès, C., Nabos, H. and Tutin, C. (2007) Marchés du logement et fractures urbaines. Collection Recherches du PUCA No. 173, Lyon: CERTU.
23. Fischel, W.A. (2001) Why are there NIMBYs?, Land Economics, 77(1), pp. 144-152.
24. Foldvary, F. (1994) Public Goods and Private Communities: The Private Provision of Social Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
25. Ghorra-Gobin, C. (1992) Planification urbaine et incorporation aux Etats-Unis: Les fondements de la politique d'exclusion, Les Annales de la recherche urbaine, 51, pp. 40-47.
26. Gilbert, G. and Guengant, A. (2002) L'économie publique locale quinze ans après: Entre espace et territoire, Revue d'économie regionale et urbaine, 1, pp. 157-182.
27. Glasze, G., Webster, C. and Frantz, K. (Eds) (2005) Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives. London: Routledge.
28. Guengant, A. (1992) Les coûts de la croissance périurbaine: l'exemple de l'agglomération rennaise. Paris: ADEF.
29. Hamilton, B.W. (1975) Zoning and property taxation in a system of local government, Urban Studies, 12(2), pp. 205-211.
30. Ihlandfeldt, K.R. (2004) Exclusionary land-use regulations within suburban communities: A review of the evidence and policy prescriptions, Urban Studies, 41(2), pp. 261-283.
31. Jaglin, S. (Ed.) (2008) Territorialisation des espaces urbanisés dans les grandes villes: Une confrontation nord/sud. Paris: LATTS, CNRS.
32. Jaillet, M.-C. (2004) L'espace périurbain: Un univers pour les classes moyennes, Esprit, 303(March/April), pp. 40-61.
33. Judd, D.R. and Swanstrom, T. (2004) City Politics: Private Power and Public Policy. New York: Pearson Longman.
34. Keil, R. and Ronneberger, K. (1994) Going up the country: internationalization and urbanization on Frankfurt's northern fringe, Environment and Planning D, 12, pp. 137-166.
35. Kelleher, C. and Lowery, D. (2002) Tiebout sorting and selective satisfaction with urban public services: Testing the variance hypothesis, Urban Affairs Review, 37(3), pp. 420-431.
36. Lagrange, H. (Ed.) (2006) L'épreuve des inégalités. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
37. Lang, R.E. and Lefurgy, J.B. (2007) Boomburbs: The Rise of America's Accidental Cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38. Lefevre, C. (2001) L'évolution de l'organisation institutionnelle des Etats européens: Des processus de décentralisation marqués par le poids des héritages nationaux. Paris: IAURIF.
39. Le Goix, R. and Webster C. (2008) Gated communities, Geography Compass, 2(4), pp. 1189-1214.
40. Low, S. and Smith, N. (Eds) (2006) The Politics of Public Space. New York: Routledge.
41. Low, S.M. (2003) Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.
42. McKenzie, E. (2005) Planning through residential clubs: Homeowners' associations, Economic Affairs, 25(4), pp. 28-31.
43. Miller, D. and Walzer, M. (1995) Pluralism, Justice and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Nelson, R.H. (2005) Private Neighborhoods and the Transformation of Local Government. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
45. Oates, W.E. (1969) The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis, Journal of Political Economy, 77(November) pp. 957-971.
46. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. and Walker, J. (1993) Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
47. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C.M. and Warren, R. (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry, The American Political Science Review, 55(4), pp. 831-842.
48. Phillips, T. and Smith, P. (2006) Rethinking urban incivility research: strangers, bodies and circulation, Urban Studies, 43(5/6), pp. 879-901.
49. Pinson, D. and Thomann, S. (2002) La maison en ses territoires: De la villa à la ville diffuse. Paris: L'Harmattan.
50. Préteceille, E. (2003) La division sociale de l'espace francilien: Typologie socioprofessionnelle 1999 et transformations de l'espace résidentiel 1990-99. Research report, Observatoire sociologique du changement, Paris.
51. Préteceille, E. (2006) La ségrégation contre la cohésion sociale: La métropole parisienne, in: H. Lagrange (Ed.) L'épreuve des inégalités, pp. 195-246. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
52. Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone.
53. Ramadier, T. (2002) Rapport au quartier, représentation de l'espace et mobilité quotidienne: Le cas d'un quartier périphérique de Québec-Ville, Espaces et Sociétés, 108/109, pp. 111-131.
54. Rémy, J. (2004) Culture de la mobilité et nouvelles formes de territorialité, in: L. Vodoz, B. Pfister-Giauque and C. Jemelin (Eds) Les territoires de la mobilité: L'aire du temps, pp. 13-42. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
55. Rhode, P.W. and Strumpf, K.S. (2003) Assessing the importance of Tiebout sorting: Local heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990, The American Economic Review, 93(5), pp. 1648-1677.
56. Rougé, L. (2005) Accession à la propriété et modes de vie en maison individuelle des familles modestes installées en périurbain lointain. Les captifs du périurbain? PhD thesis, University of Toulouse -Le Mira il.
57. Sack, R. (1986) Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Sandler, T. and Tschirhart, J. (1997) Club theory: Thirty years later, Public Choice, 93, pp. 335-355.
59. Soja, E. (2000) Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Region. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
60. Teaford, J.C. (1997) Post-suburbia: Government and Politics in the Edge Cities. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
61. Tiebout, C. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures, The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), pp. 416-424.
62. Urry, J. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London: Routledge.
63. Vilmin, T. (2006) Le système local de l'urbanisation en maisons individuelles: Étude de cas en Ile-de-France. Logiville, rapport pour le PUCA, Ministère de l'Equipement.
64. Walzer, M. (1984) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
65. Webster, C.J. (2002) Property rights and the public realm: Gates, green belts and gemeinschaft, Environment and Planning B, 29(3), pp. 397-412.
66. Webster, C.J. (2003) The nature of the neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 40(13), pp. 2591-2612.
67. Webster, C.J. and Lai, L.W.C. (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
68. Wollmann, H. (2000) Local government systems: From historic divergence towards convergence? Great Britain, France, and Germany as comparative cases in point, Environment and Planning C, 18, pp. 33-55.