CT colonography: interpretative performance in a non-academic environment

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 424-429

  Burling, D ^a   Halligan, S ^a   Atchley, J ^a   Dhingsar, R ^a   Guest, P ^a   Hayward, S ^a   Higginson, A ^a   Jobling, C ^a   Kay, C ^a   Lilford, R ^a   Maskell, G ^a   McCafferty, I ^a   McGregor, J ^a   Morton, D ^a   Kumar Neelala, M ^a   Noakes, M ^a   Philips, A ^a   Riley, P ^a   Taylor, A ^a   Bassett, P ^a   Wardle, J ^a   Atkin, W ^a   Taylor, S A ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON CANCER; COLON POLYP; COMPETENCE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; TRAINING; TUMOR VOLUME;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33947578759     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kalish G.M., Bhargavan M., Sunshine J.H., et al. Self-referred whole-body imaging: where are we now?. Radiology 233 (2004) 353-358
2. Burling D., Halligan S., Taylor S.A., et al. CT colonography practice in the UK: a national survey. Clin Radiol 59 (2004) 39-43
3. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) CT colonography study group investigators. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multi-center study. Radiology 242 (2007) 152-161
4. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Taylor S.A., et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237 (2005) 893-904
5. Mulhall B.P., Veerappan G.R., and Jackson J.L. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 142 (2005) 635-650
6. Sosna J., Morrin M.M., Kruskal J.B., et al. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 (2003) 1593-1598
7. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
8. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
9. Rockey D.C., Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365 (2005) 305-311
10. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Burling D., et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14 (2004) 1025-1033
11. Barish M.A., Soto J.A., and Ferrucci J.T. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 786-792
12. Zalis M.E., Barish M.A., Choi J.R., et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236 (2005) 3-9
13. Thompson W. Wessex regional radiology audit: barium enema in colo-rectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 51 (1996) 525
14. Tawn D.J., Squire C.J., Mohammed M.A., et al. National audit of the sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema for colorectal carcinoma, using control charts for the Royal College of Radiologists Clinical Radiology Audit Sub-Committee. Clin Radiol 60 (2005) 558-564