Time post-onset does not affect response to treatment in patients with chronic aphasia ≥1 year after stroke

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 199-202

  Wendt, Oliver ^a   Koul, Rajinder ^b   Hassink, Johanna ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; COMPREHENSION; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; ONSET AGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SHORT SURVEY; SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST; SPEECH THERAPY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 57649174795     PISSN: 17489539     EISSN: 17489547     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17489530802581595     Document Type: Short Survey

References (15)

1. Basso, A. (1992) Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology, 6, pp. 337-348.
2. Eysenck, HJ (1978) An exercise in mega-silliness. American Psychologist, 33, p. 517.
3. Geschwind, N. (1985) Mechanisms of change after brain lesions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Hope for a new neurology, 457, pp. 1-11. Academy of Sciences, New York
4. Kennedy, CH (2005) Single-case designs for educational research, Allyn & Bacon, Boston
5. Kertesz, A. and McCabe, P. (1977) Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia. Brain, 100, pp. 1-18.
6. Koul, RK and Corwin, M. (2003) Efficacy of AAC intervention in individuals with chronic severe aphasia. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice, pp. 449-470. Elsevier Science, New York
7. Ma, HH (2006) An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification, 30, pp. 598-617.
8. Mountcastle, VB (1978) An organizing principle for cerebral function: The unit module and the distributed system. The mindful brain: Cortical organization and the group-selective theory of higher brain function, pp. 7-50. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
9. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (1997) Aphasia
10. Parker, RI, Hagan-Burke, S. and Vannest, K. (2007) Percent of all non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND. Journal of Special Education, 40, pp. 194-204.
11. Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA
12. Schlosser, RW, Wendt, O. and Sigafoos, J. (2007) Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, pp. 138-150.
13. Scruggs, TE, Mastropieri, MA and Casto, G. (1987) The quantitative synthesis of single subject research methodology: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, pp. 24-33.
14. Sharpe, D. (1997) Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, pp. 881-901.
15. Torgerson, C. (2003) Systematic reviews, Continuum, London, UK