Administrative justice, discretion and the 'welfare to work' project

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 323-338

  Sainsbury, Roy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57649159441     PISSN: 09649069     EISSN: 14699621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09649060802580995     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adler, M. (2003) A socio-legal approach to administrative justice. Law and policy, 25, pp. 323-352.
2. Adler, M. and Longhurst, B. (1994) Discourse, power and justice: Towards a new sociology of imprisonment, Routledge, London
3. Bailey, R., Hales, J., Hayllar, O. and Wood, M. (2007) Pathways to Work: customer experience and outcomes. Findings from a survey of new and repeat incapacity benefits customers in the first seven pilot areas, Corporate Document Services, Leeds
4. Barnes, H. and Hudson, M. (2006) Pathways to Work: Qualitative research on the condition management programme, Corporate Document Services, Leeds
5. Bull, D. (1980) The anti-discretion movement in Britain: Fact or phantom. Journal of social welfare law, 2, pp. 65-83.
6. Corden, A. and Nice, K. (2006) Pathways to Work from Incapacity Benefits: A study of experience and use of Return to Work Credit, Corporate Document Services, Leeds
7. Cowan, D. and Halliday, S. (2003) The appeal of internal review
8. Dalley, G. and Berthoud, R. (1992) Challenging discretion: The social fund review procedure, Policy Studies Institute, London
9. Davis, K. C. (1971) Discretionary justice, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL
10. Department for Work and Pensions (2006) A new deal for welfare: empowering people to work, The Stationery Office, London
11. Department for Work and Pensions (2007) In work, better off: Next steps to full employment, The Stationery Office, London
12. Dickens, S., Mowlam, A. and Woodfield, K. (2004) Incapacity Benefit reforms - the personal advisor role and practices, DWP Research Management, LeedsS
13. Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking rights seriously, Duckworth, London
14. Galligan, D. (1986) Discretionary powers, Clarendon Press, Oxford
15. Halliday, S. (2003) Judicial review and compliance with administrative law, Hart, Oxford
16. Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R. (1984) Law and administration, Weidenfield and Nicolson, London
17. (1999) Administrative justice in the 21st century, Hart, Oxford
18. (1992) The uses of discretion, Clarendon Press, Oxford
19. Hood, C. (1991) A new public management for all seasons. Public administration, 69, pp. 3-19.
20. Knight, T., Dickens, S., Mitchell, M. and Woodfield, K. (2005) Incapacity Benefit reforms-the personal adviser role and practices: stage two, Corporate Document Services, Leeds
21. Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-level bureaucracy, Russell Sage Foundation, New York
22. Mashaw, J. (1983) Bureaucratic Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven
23. Mitchell, M. and Woodfield, K. (2008) Qualitative research exploring the Pathways to Work sanctions regime, Corporate Document Services, Leeds
24. National Audit Office (2006) Jobcentre Plus. Delivering effective services through personal advisers, The Stationery Office, London
25. Sainsbury, R. (1992) Administrative justice: Discretion and procedure in social security decision-making. The uses of discretion, Clarendon Press, Oxford
26. Sainsbury, R. (1994) Internal reviews and the weakening of social security claimants' rights of appeal. Administrative law and government action, Oxford University Press, Oxford
27. Sainsbury, R. and Eardley, T. (1992) Housing Benefit review boards: A case for slum clearance?. Public law, pp. 551-558.
28. Tata, C. (2007) Sentencing as craftwork and the binary epistemologies of the discretionary decision process. Social & legal studies, 16:3, pp. 425-447.
29. Taylor, I. and Kelly, J. (2006) Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: Re-visiting Lipsky. International journal of public sector management, 19, pp. 629-642.