Assessing geometric reliability of corrected images from very high resolution satellites

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 74, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1551-1560

  Aguilar, Manuel A ^a   Aguilar, Fernando J ^a   Agüera, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RELIABILITY; ROCK MECHANICS; SATELLITES; TRACKING (POSITION);

DIFFERENTIAL GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS; GROUND CONTROL POINTS; INDEPENDENT CHECK POINTS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHODS; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; THEORETICAL APPROACH; VERY HIGH RESOLUTION;

SATELLITE IMAGERY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ERROR ANALYSIS; ERROR CORRECTION; GEOMETRY; GPS; GROUND CONTROL; IKONOS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RESOLUTION; IMAGING METHOD; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PANCHROMATIC IMAGE; QUICKBIRD; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

EID: 57649123317     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.74.12.1551     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aguilar, F.J., F. Carvajal, M.A. Aguilar, and F. Agüera, 2007a. Developing digital cartography in rural planning applications, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 55(2):89-106.
2. Aguilar, F.J., F. Agüera, and M.A. Aguilar, 2007b. A theoretical approach to modeling the accuracy assessment of Digital Elevation Models, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73(12):1367-1379.
3. Aguilar, M.A., F.J. Aguilar, F. Agüera, and J.A. Sánchez, 2007c. Geometric accuracy assessment of QuickBird basic imagery using different operational approaches, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73(12):1321-1332.
4. st International Cartographic Conference, 09-16 July, A Coruña, Spain (The International Cartographic Association), unpaginated CD-ROM.
5. Cheng, P., D. Smith, and S. Sutton, 2005. Mapping of QuickBird images using the RPC method improvement in accuracy since release of first QuickBird data, GEOInformatics, 8(4):50-52.
6. Daniel, C., and K. Tennant, 2001. DEM quality assessment, Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications: The DEM Users Manual (D.F. Maune, editor), American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 395-440.
7. Davis, C.H., and X. Wang, 2003. Planimetric accuracy of Ikonos 1 m panchromatic orthoimage products and their utility for local government GIS basemap applications, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(22):4267-4288.
8. Di, K., R. Ma, and R. Li, 2003. Geometric processing of Ikonos Geo stereo imagery for coastal mapping applications, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(8):873-879.
9. European Commission, 2003. Guidelines for Quality Checking of Ortho Imagery, URL: http://agrifish.jrc.it/documents/lpis/2402v2_5.pdf (last date accesed: 18 August 2008).
10. FGDC, 1998. Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards Part 3: National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy. URL: http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/ FGDC-standards-projects/accuracy/part3/chapter3, U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Reston, Virginia (last date accessed: 18 August 2008).
11. rd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing (ACRS 2002), 25-29 November, Kathmandu, Nepal, (ACRS), unpaginated CD-ROM.
12. Fraser, C.S., H.B. Hanley, and T. Yamakewa, 2002. Three-dimensional geopositioning accuracy of Ikonos imagery, The Photogrammetric Record, 17(99):465-479.
13. Fraser C.S., and H.B. Hanley, 2003. Bias compensation in rational function for Ikonos satellite imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(1):53-57.
14. Faser, C.S., and H.B. Hanley, 2005. Bias-compensated RPCs for sensor orientation of high-resolution satellite imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(8):909-915.
15. Ganas, A., E. Lagios, and N. Tzannetos, 2002. An investigation into the spatial accuracy of the Ikonos 2 orthoimagery within an urban environment, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(17):3513-3519.
16. Grodecki, J., and G. Dial, 2003. Block adjustment of high-resolution satellite images described by rational polynomials, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(1):59-68.
17. Hu, Y., and C.V. Tao, 2002. Updating solution of the rational function model using additional control information, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 68(7):715-724.
18. th International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 35(Part B5), 12-23 July, Istambul, Turkey, unpaginated CD ROM.
19. Kay, S., P. Spruyt, and K. Alexandrou, 2003. Geometric quality assessment of orthorectified VHR space image data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(5):484-491.
20. Li, Z., 1991. Effects of check points on the reliability of DTM accuracy estimates obtained from experimental tests, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 57(10):1333-1340.
21. Noguchi, M., C.S. Fraser, T. Nakamura, T. Shimono, and S. Oki, 2004. Accuracy assesment of QuickBird stereo imagery, The Photogrammetric Record, 19(106):128-137.
22. Shaker, A., W. Shi, and H. Barakat, 2005. Assessment of the rectification accuracy of Ikonos imagery based on two-dimensional models, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(4):719-731.
23. Tao, C.V., and Y. Hu, 2001. A comprehesive study of the rational function model for photogrammetric processing, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 67(12):1347-1357.
24. Toutin, T., 1995. Multi-source data integration with an integrated and unified geometric modelling, EARSeL Journal Advances in Remote Sensing, 4(2):118-129.
25. Toutin, T., 2003. Error tracking in Ikonos geometric processing using a 3D parametric model. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(1):43-51.
26. Toutin, T., 2004a. Geometric processing of remote sensing images: Models, algorithms and methods, Review article, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(10):1893-1924.
27. Toutin, T., 2004b. Comparison of stereo-extracted DTM from different high-resolution sensors: SPOT-5, EROS-A, IKONOS-II, and QuickBird, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(10):2121-2129.
28. th International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 35(Part 33), 12-23 July, Istanbul, Turkey, unpaginated CD ROM.
29. Toutin, T., 2006. Comparison of 3D physical and empirical models for generating DSMs from stereo HR images, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(5):597-604.
30. Wang, H., and E.C. Ellis, 2005. Spatial accuracy of orthorectified Ikonos imagery and historical aerial photographs across five sites in China, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(9):1893-1911.
31. th International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 12-23, Istambul, Turkey, 35(Part B1), unpaginated CD ROM.
32. Zhou, G., and R. Li, 2000. Accuracy evaluation of ground points from Ikonos high-resolution satellite imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 66(9):1103-1112.