Planimetric accuracy of Ikonos 1 m panchromatic orthoimage products and their utility for local government GIS basemap applications

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 24, Issue 22, 2003, Pages 4267-4288

  Davis, C H ^a   Wang, X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; IMAGE PROCESSING;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS (DEM);

REMOTE SENSING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; GIS; IKONOS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; ORTHOIMAGE; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

EID: 0345550252     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0143116031000070328     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. DAVIS, C. H., and WANG, X., 2001, High resolution DEMs for urban applications from NAPP photography. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 585-592.
2. DAVIS, C. H., JIANG, H., and WANG, X., 2001, Modeling and estimation of the spatial variation of elevation error in high-resolution DEMs from stereo-image processing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 2483-2489.
3. GANAS, A., LAGIOS, E., and TZANNETOS, N., 2002, An investigation into the spatial accuracy of the IKONOS 2 orthoimagery within an urban environment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 3513-3519.
4. GESCH, D., OIMOEN, M., GREENLEE, S., NELSON, C., STEUCK, M., and TYLER, D., 2002, The National Elevation Dataset. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68, 5-12.
5. GONG, J., LI, Z., ZHU, Q., SUI, H., and ZHOU, Y., 2000, Effects of various factors on the accuracy of DEMs: an intensive experimental investigation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66, 1113-1117.
6. GREENFELD, J., 2001, Evaluating the accuracy of digital orthophoto quadrangles (DOQ) in the context of parcel-based GIS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 199-205.
7. HIPPLE, J., and DAUGHERTY, D., 2000, Urban validation site for testing impervious surface models derived from remotely sensed imagery. Proceedings of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii, 24-28 July 2000, vol. 7, pp. 2885-2889.
8. LIGHT, D. L., 1993, The National Aerial Photography Program as a Geographic Information System Resource. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 59, 61-65.
9. NASA, 2001, Scientific Databuy-Phase II, http://www.crsp.ssc.nasa.gov/scripts/databuy, NASA Stennis Space Center, Stennis, MS, USA.
10. PCI Geomatics, 2001a, APEX-Aerial Photo Elevation EXtraction, http://www.pcigeomatics.com/product_ind/apex.html, PCI Geomatics, Ontario, Canada.
11. PCI Geomatics. 2001b, Geomatica OrthoEngine V8.0, http://www.pcigeomatics.com/product_ind/orthoengine/packages.html, PCI Geomatics, Ontario, Canada.
12. Space Imaging, 2000, Space imaging catalog of products and services, vol. 1 (Suppl). Space Imaging, Thornton, CO, USA.
13. Space Imaging, 2002, Commercial imagery product pricing-version 3.0, 1 May 2002, http://www.spaceimaging.com/products/SI_pricebook.pdf.
14. TOUTIN, T., 1995, Multi-source data fusion with an integrated and unified geometric modeling. EARSeL Journal on Advances in Remote Sensing, 4, 118-129.
15. TOUTIN, T., and CHENG, P., 2000, Demystification of IKONOS. Earth Observation Magazine, 9, (7).
16. USGS, 1996, Standards for digital orthophotos, part 1: General, part 2: Specifications. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA.
17. USGS, 1997, Standards for digital elevation models, part 1: General, part 2: Specifications, part 3: Quality Control. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA.