Breast imaging, computer-aided detection, and computer-assisted classification

PACS: A Guide to the Digital Revolution: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 433-445

  Buchbinder, Shalom S ^a,b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b STATEN ISLAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57549108751     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-31070-3_21     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Australian Health Technology Assessment Commission. Review of automated and semi-automated cervical screening devices-a summary. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services; 1998.
2. Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. October 2003;181:1083-1088.
3. Bamberger P, Novak B, Fields, S. Optimizing parameters for computer aided diagnosis of microcalcifications in mammography. Acad Radiol. 2000;7:406-412.
4. Beam CA, Sullivan DC, Layde PM. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Acad Radiol. 1996;3:891-897.
5. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology. 1992;184:613-617.
6. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology. 2001; 219:192-202.
7. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. September 2003;181(3):687-693.
8. Buchbinder S, Novak B. Quantitative characterization of mass lesions on digitized mammograms for computer assisted diagnosis. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:366-372.
9. Buchbinder S, Leichter I, Bamberger P, et al. Analysis of clustered microcalcification using a single numeric classifier extracted from mammographic digital images. Acad Radiol. November 1998;5:779-784.
10. Buchbinder S, Leichter I, Lederman R, et al. Can the size of microcalcifications predict malignancy of clusters in mammography? Acad Radiol. 2002;9:18-25.
11. Buchbinder S, Leichter I, Lederman R, et al. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions. Radiology. 2004;230:820-823.
12. Burhenne LW, Wood S, D'Orsi C, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology. 2000;215: 554-562.
13. Cady B, Michaelson JS. The life sparing potential of mammographic screening. Cancer. 2001;91:1699-1703.
14. Ciatto S, Del Turco MR, Morrone D, et al. Independent double reading of screening mammograms. J Med Screen. 1995;2:99-101.
15. Destounis SV, Dinitto P, Young-Logan W, et al. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. RSNA. 2004;578:584-585.
16. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer. 2002;95:458-469.
17. Fields S, Lederman R, Buchbinder S, et al. Improved mammographic accuracy with CAD assisted ranking of lesions. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, June 2002, Bremen, Germany.
18. Fields S, Leichter I, Lederman R, et al. Improving the Performance of Mammographic Assessment by the use of an Advanced Two-tiered CAD/CAC System. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, June 2004, Charolotte, NC, USA.
19. Freer T, Ulissey M. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12, 860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology. 2001;220:781-786.
20. Helvie MA, Hadijiiski L, Makariou E, et al. Sensitivity of Noncommercial Computer- aided Detection System for Mammographic Breast Cancer Detection: Pilot Clinical Trial RSNA. 2004;208:214.
21. Improving the performance of mammographic assessment by the use of an advanced two-tiered CAD/CAC system. Digital Mammography. 2002.
22. Kopans D. Breast Imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.
23. Leichter I, Fields S, Nirel R, et al. Improved mammographic interpretations of masses using computer-aided diagnosis: Eur Radiol. 2000;10:377-383.
24. Leichter I, Lederman R, Buchbinder S. Mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the individual mc's shape play compared to the cluster geometry? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:705-712.
25. Leichter I, Lederman R, Novak B, et al. The use of interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications of digitized film-screen mammograms. Invest Radiol. June 1999;34:394-400.
26. Lederman R, Leichter I, Buchbinder S, et al. Stratification of mammographic computerized analysis by BIRADS categories, Eur Radiol. 2003;13:347-353.
27. Malich A, Azhari T, Bohm T, et al. Reproducibility: an important factor determining the quality of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems. Eur Radiol. 2000;36:170-174.
28. Malich A, Marx C, Facius M, et al. Tumor detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:2454-2459.
29. Nelson MT, Lechner MC. Comparison of three commercially available FDA approved computer-aided detection (CAD) systems [abstract]. Radiology. 2002; 225(P):600.
30. Oestmann JW. Digital mammography. In: Radiological Diagnosis of Breast Disease. Friedrich M, Sickles EA, eds. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1997:65-73.
31. Petrick N, Sahiner B, Chan HP, et al. Breast cancer detection: evaluation of a mass detection algorithm for computer-aided diagnosis-experience in 263 patients. Radiology. 2002;224:217-224.
32. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HC, et al. Beyond randomized controlled trials; organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer. 2001;91:1724-1731.
33. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology. 1994;191: 241-244.
34. Winsberg F, Elkin M, Macy J, et al. Detection of radiographic abnormalities in mammograms by means of optical scanning and computer analysis. Radiology. 1967;89:211-215.
35. Zheng B, Hardesty L, Poller WR, et al. Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment-initial experience. Radiology. 2003;228:58-62.