Computer-aided Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Lesions

Radiology

Volumn 230, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 820-823

  Buchbinder, Shalom S ^a,d   Leichter, Isaac S ^b   Lederman, Richard B ^c   Novak, Boris ^b   Bamberger, Philippe N ^b   Skiair Levy, Miryam ^c   Yarmish, Gail ^a   Fields, Scott I ^c  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^c HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^d STATEN ISLAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Computers, diagnostic aid

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBABILITY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 1342287470     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303030089     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998.
2. American College of Radiology. Mammography quality control manual. Reston, Va: ACR Committee on Quality Assurance in Mammography, 1999.
3. Caplan LS, Blackman D, Nadel M, Monticilio DL. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding-short interval follow-up suggested." AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:339-342.
4. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991; 179:463-468.
5. Rubin E. Six-month follow-up: an alternative view. Radiology 1999; 213:15-18.
6. Sickles EA. Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? Radiology 1999; 213: 11-14.
7. Sickles EA. Commentary on Dr Rubin's viewpoint. Radiology 1999; 213:19-20.
8. Rubin E. Commentary on Dr Sickles's viewpoint. Radiology 1999; 213:21.
9. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Non-palpable probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:409-414.
10. Lindfors KK, O'Connor J, Acredolo CR, Liston SE. Short interval follow-up versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: assessment of patient stress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:55-58.
11. Lindfors KK, Rosenquist CJ. Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1994; 190:217-222.
12. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, et al. Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses. Med Phys 1995; 22:1569.
13. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Wolverton DE, Schmidt RA, Doi K. Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 1998; 5:155-168.
14. Rangayyan RM, El-Faramawy NM, Desautels JE, Alim OA. Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 799-810.
15. Fields S, Leichter I, Bamberger P, et al. Clinical evaluation of computerized enhancement and analysis of mammographic findings. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital mammography '96. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 1996; 81-86.
16. Kendall MG, Stuart A. The advanced theory of statistics. Vol 3. Design and analysis, and time-series. London, England: Griffin, 1968; 314-341.
17. Efron B. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Philadelphia, Pa: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982.
18. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:720-733.
19. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 'early' breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143:461-464.
20. de Lafontan B, Daures JP, Salicru B, et al. Isolated clustered microcalcifications: diagnostic value of mammography-series of 400 cases with surgical verification. Radiology 1994; 190:479-483.