The epistemological significance of the theory of social representations

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 461-487

  Marková, Ivana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dialogical linguistics; Dialogicality; Einstein's triangle of relations; Interactional epistemology; Natural thinking; Theory of social representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 57549093670     PISSN: 00218308     EISSN: 14685914     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00382.x     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Allansdottir, A., Jovchelovitch, S. Stathopoulou, A. 1993. Social Representations: the Versatility of a Concept. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 3 10.
2. Asch, S.E. 1951. Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgment. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, Leadership and Men, pp. 177 190. Pittsburg : Carnegie Press.
3. Asch, S.E. 1956. Studies on Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One Against as Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1 70.
4. Bakhtin, M.M. 1984. Problems of Dostoyevsky's Poetics. Ed. and transl. by C. Emerson. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
5. Bakhtin, M.M. 1979 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Transl. by V.W. McGee Ed. C. Emerson M. Holquist. Austin : University of Texas.
6. Bartlett, F. 1958. Thinking: An Experimental and Social Study. New York : Basic Books.
7. Bauer, M.W. Gaskell, G. 1999. Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations. Journal for Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163 186.
8. Benveniste, E. 1966 1971. Problems in General Linguistics. Oxford OH : University of Miami Press.
9. Billington, J. 1966. The Icon and the Axe. The Interpretative History of Russian Culture. London : Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
10. Bres, J. 1998. Entendre des Voix: De Quelques Marqueurs Dialogiques en Français. In J. Bres, R. Delamotte-Legrand, F. Madray-Lesigne et P. Siblot (Eds.), L'autre en Discours. pp. 191 212. Montpellier et Rouen : Praxiling et Dyalang.
11. Bres, J. 1999. Vous les Entendez? Analyse du Discours et Dialogisme. Modèles Linguistiques, 20, 71 86.
12. Bres, J. Verine, B. 2002. Le Bruissement des Voix Dans le Discours: Dialogisme et Discours Rapporté. Faits de Langues, 19, 159 169.
13. Bridgman, P.W. 1929 In P.A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, pp. 1 95. New York : Tudor Publishing Company.
14. Bronowski, J. 1951. The Common Sense of Science. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
15. Buschini, F. Kalampalikis, N. 2001. Penser Levie, le Social la Nature. Paris : Editions de la Maison des Sciences de L'homme.
16. Cassirer, E. 1923. Substance and Function and Einstrin's Theory of Relativity. Chicago and London : The Open Court.
17. Chaudbury, P.J. 1962. Newton and Hypothesis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 22, 344 353.
18. Chryssides, A., Dashtipour, P., Keshet, S., Righi, C. Sammut, G. Sartawi, M. Forthcoming. We Don't Share! The Social Representation Approach, Enactivism and the Fundamental Incompabilities Between the Two. Culture & Psychology.
19. Darwin, G. Notebook C. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. http://darwin-online.org.uk.
20. Duveen, G. 2007. Culture and Social Representations. In J. Valsiner A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology, pp. 543 559. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
21. Einstein, A. 1948. Letter 153 to M. Besso, 6th January 1948. In A. Einstein M. Besso (1972). Correspondance, 1903-1955. Paris : Hermann.
22. Einstein, A. 1949. Autobiographical Notes. In P.A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, pp. 1 95. New York : Tudor Publishing Company.
23. Einstein, A. 1997. The Meaning of Relativity. London : Elecbook.
24. Einstein, A. Infeld, L. 1938 1961. The Evolution of Physics. London : Cambridge University Press.
25. Festinger, L. 1980. Looking backward. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Retrospections on Social Psychology, pp. 236 254. New York and Oxford : Oxford University Press.
26. Greenwood, J.D. 2004. The Disapperance of the Social in American Social Psychology. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
27. Gruber, H.E. 1974. Darwin on Man. A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
28. Gruber, H.E. Bödeker, K. 2005. Creativity, Psychology and the History of Science. Dordrecht : Springer.
29. Harré, R. Secord, P.F. 1972. The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford : Blackwell.
30. Heisenberg, W. 2003. Le Manuscrit de 1942. Paris : Allia.
31. Howarth, C. 2006. A Social Representation is Not a Quiet Thing: Exploring the Critical Potential of Social Representations Theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 65 86.
32. Humphrey, G. 1951. Thinking: Introduction to Its Experimental Psychology. New York : Wiley.
33. Jackson, J.M. 1988. Social Psychology, Past and Present. Hillsdale : Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Jodelet, D. 2008. Le Mouvement de Retour Vers le Sujet et L'approache des Représentations Sociales. Connexions, 89, 25 46.
35. Jovchelovitch, S. 2007. Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London and New York : Routledge.
36. Leroy, S. 2004. De L'identification à la Catégorisation. Louvain, Paris : Editions Peeters.
37. Levine, J.M. Thompson, L. 1996. Conflict in Groups. In E.T. Higgins A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology. Handbook of Basic Principles, pp. 745 776. New York and London : The Guilford Press.
38. Lewin, K. 1931. The Conflict Between Aristotelian and Galilean Modes of Thought in Contemporary Psychology. The Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141 177.
39. Lewin, K. 1949. Cassirer's Philosophy of Science and the Social Sciences. In P.A. Schilpp (Ed.), The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, pp. 269 288. LaSalle : Open Court.
40. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. White, R. 1939. Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created "Social Climates". Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271 299.
41. Lippa, R.A. 1990. Introduction to Social Psychology. Belmont : Wadsworth.
42. Marková, I. 2000. Amédée or How to Get Rid of It: Social Representations from a Dialogical Perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6, pp. 419 460.
43. Marková, I. 2003. Dialogicality and Social Representations. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
44. Marková, I. 2007. Themata in Dialogue: Taking Social Knowledge as Shared. In I. Marková, P. Linell, M. Grossen A. Salazar Orvig. Dialogue in Focus Groups. Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge, pp. 167 193. London : Equinox.
45. Medawar, P.B. 1967. The Science of the Soluble. London : Methuen.
46. Miller, A.I. 1975. Albert Einstein and Max Wertheimer: a Gestalt Psychologist's View of the Genesis of Specials Relativity Theory. History of Science, 13, 75 103.
47. Moscovici, S. 1961. La Psychanalyse: Son Image et Son Public. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
48. Moscovici, S. 1970. Préface. In D. Jodelet, J. Viet, P. Besnard (Eds.), La Psychologie Sociale, Une Discipline en Mouvement, pp. 9 64. Paris-La Haye : Mouton.
49. Moscovici, S. 1972a. Society and Theory in Social Psychology. In J. Israel H. Tajfel (Eds.), The Context of Social Psychology, pp. 17 68. Academic Press, London and New York.
50. Moscovici, S. 1972b. (Ed.). The Psychosociology of Language. Chicago : Markham.
51. Moscovici, S. 1976. Social Influence and Social Change. Transl. by C. Sherrard G. Heinz. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
52. Moscovici, S. 1984. Introduction: Le Domaine de la Psychologie Sociale. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie Sociale, pp. 5 22. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
53. Moscovici, S. 1992. The Discovery of Group Polarization. In D. Granberg G. Sarup (Eds.), Social Judgement and Intergroup Relations, pp. 107 127. New York : Springer.
54. Moscovici, S. 1993. Toward a Social Psychology of Science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23, 343 374.
55. Moscovici, S. 2001. Why a Theory of Social Representations? In K. Deaux G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the Social, pp. 8 35. Oxford : Blackwell.
56. Moscovici, S. 2007. La Relativité a Cent Ans. http://www.serge- moscovici.fr
57. Moscovici, S. 2008. Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public. Cambridge : Polity Press.
58. Moscovici, S., Lage, E. Naffrechoux, M. 1969. Influence of a Consistent Minority on the Responses of a Majority in a Colour-Perception Task. Sociometry, 32, 365 380.
59. Moscovici, S. Marková, I. 2000. Ideas and Their Development: A Dialogue Between Serge Moscovici and Ivana Marková. In S. Moscovici, Social Representations (G. Duveen. Ed.). Cambridge : Polity Press.
60. Moscovici, S. Marková, I. 2006. The Making of Modern Social Psychology: The Hidden Story of How an International Social Science Was Created. Cambridge : Polity Press.
61. Moscovici, S. Vignaux, G. 1994. Le Concept de Thêmata. In Ch. Guimelli, Structures et Transformations des Représentations Sociales, pp. 25 72. Neuchatel : Delachaux et Niestlé. Reprinted in S. Moscovici. Social Representations 2000). pp. 156 183 Ed. G. Duveen). Cambridge : Polity Press.
62. Mugny, G. 1984. Compliance, Conversion and the Asch Paradigm European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 353 368.
63. Nicolson, M. 1950. The Breaking of the Circle. Studies in the Effect of ther "New Science" Upon Seventeenth Century Poetry. Evanston : North Western University Press.
64. Petty, R.E. Wegener, T.D. 1998. Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 323 390. New York : McGraw Hill.
65. Raudsepp, M. 2005. Commentary: Why is it so Difficult to Understand the Theory of Social Representations? Culture & Psychology, 11, 455 468.
66. Reichenbach, H. 1949. The Philosophical Significance of the Theory of Relativity. In P.A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, pp. 1 95. New York : Tudor Publishing Company.
67. Sabini, J. 1995. Social Psychology. New York : W. W. Norton.
68. Salazar Orvig, A. 2005. Les Facettes du Dialogisme Dans Une Discussion Ordinaire. In P.P. Haillet et G. Karmaoui (Eds Regards sur L'héritage de Mikhaïl Bakhtine, pp. 35 66. Amiens : Encrage.
69. Salazar Orvig, A. 2007. Who is Speaking in Focus Groups? The Dialogical Display of Heterogeneity. In I. Marková, P. Linell, M. Grossen A. Salazar Orvig. Dialogue in Focus Groups. Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge, pp. 103 129. London : Equinox.
70. Salazar Orvig, A. Grossen, M. 2008. Le Dialogisme Dans L'entretien Clinique. Langage et Société, 123, 37 52.
71. Saussure, F. 1915 1959. Course in General Linguistics. Glasgow : William Collins.
72. Seriot, P. 1985. Analyse du Discours Politique Soviétique. Paris : Institut d'études slaves.
73. Solmitz, W.M. 1949. Cassirer on Galileo: An Example of Cassirer's Way of Thought, pp. 729 756. In P.A. Schilpp (Ed.), The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, pp. 269 288. LaSalle : Open Court.
74. Taylor, C. 1964. The Explanation of Behaviour. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
75. Taylor, C. 1995. Overcoming Epistemology. In C. Taylor (Ed.), Philosophical Arguments, pp. 1 19. London and Massachusetts : Harvard University Press.
76. Verheggen, T. Baerveldt, C. 2007. We Don't Share! The Social Representation Approach, Enactivism and the Ground for an Intrinsically Social Psychology. Culture & Psychology, 13, 5 27.
77. Vion, R. 1998. Le Sujet en Linguistique. In R. Vion (Ed.), Les Sujets et Leurs Discours, pp. 189 202. Aix en Provence : Publications de l'Université de Provence.
78. Vion, R. 2001. Modalités, Modalisations et Activités Langagières. Marges Linguistiques, 2, 209 231.
79. Voelklein, C. Howarth, C. 2005. A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: a British Debate, Culture & Psychology, 11, 431 454.
80. Vygotsky, L.S. 1927 1987. The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological Investigation. New York : Plenum.
81. Wagner, W. Hayes, N. 2005. Everyday Discourse and Common Sense. Houndsmills and New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
82. Yang, G.K. 1959. Chinese Communist Society: The Family and the Village. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
83. Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F. Psaltis, C. 2007. The Metaphor of the Triangle in Theories of Human Devevopment. Human Development, 50, pp. 208 229.