Stochastic watershed water quality simulation for TMDL development - A case study in the newport bay watershed

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1397-1410

  Zheng, Yi ^a   Keller, Arturo A ^b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Diazinon; Management Objectives Constrained Analysis Of Uncertainty; Nonpoint source pollution; Pesticide; Stochastic simulation; Total Maximum Daily Load; Uncertainty analysis; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULIC MODELS; LANDFORMS; MODAL ANALYSIS; MODEL STRUCTURES; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOIL CONSERVATION; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

DIAZINON; MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES CONSTRAINED ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTY; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; STOCHASTIC SIMULATION; TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; PESTICIDE; STOCHASTICITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

CALIFORNIA; NEWPORT BAY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 57449119705     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00232.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beven, K.J. A. Binley, 1992. The Future Of Distributed Models - Model Calibration and Uncertainty Prediction. Hydrological Processes 6 (3 279 298.
2. Bicknell, B.R., J.C. Imhoff, J.L. Kittle, T.H. Jobes A.S. Donigian, 2001. Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN: HSPF Version 12, User's Manual. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, USEPA, Athens, GA.
3. Chen, C.W., J. Herr L. Weintraub, 2004. Decision Support System for Stakeholder Involvement. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE 130 (6 714 721.
4. Chung, S.W., P.W. Gassman, R. Gu R.S. Kanwar, 2002. Evaluation of EPIC for Assessing Tile Flow and Nitrogen Losses for Alternative Agricultural Management Systems. Transactions of the ASAE 45 (4 1135 1146.
5. COPFRD (County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department 2002. San Diego Creek Sediment Monitoring Program 2001-2002 Annual Report. COPFRD report, Santa Ana, California.
6. COPFRD (County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department 2003. San Diego Creek Sediment Monitoring Program 2002-2003 Annual Report. COPFRD report, Santa Ana, California.
7. COPFRD (County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department 2004. San Diego Creek Sediment Monitoring Program 2003-2004 Annual Report. COPFRD report, Santa Ana, California.
8. COPFRD (County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department 2005. San Diego Creek Sediment Monitoring Program 2004-2005 Annual Report. COPFRD report, Santa Ana, California.
9. Dilks, D.W. P.L. Freedman, 2004. Improved Consideration of the Margin of Safety in Total Maximum Daily Load Development. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE 130 (6 690 694.
10. Duan, Q., V.K. Gupta S. Sorooshian, 1992. Effective and Efficient Global Optimization for Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models. Water Resources Research 28 : 1015 1031.
11. Gherini, S.A., L. Mok, R.J.M. Hudson, G.F. Davis, C.W. Chen R.A. Goldstein, 1985. The ILWAS Model - Formulation and Application. Water Air Soil Pollution 26 (4 425 459.
12. Green, C.H., M.D. Tomer, M. DiLuzio J.G. Arnold, 2006. Hydrologic Evaluation of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool for a Large Tile-Drained Watershed in Iowa. Transactions of the ASABE 49 (2 413 422.
13. Iman, P.L. J.C. Helton, 1985. A Comparison Of Uncertainty And Sensitivity Analysis Techniques For Computer Models. NUREG/CR-3904, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
14. Keller, A.A., Y. Zheng T.H. Robinson, 2004. Determining Critical Water Quality Conditions for Inorganic Nitrogen in Dry Semi-Urbanized Watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40 (3 721 735.
15. Kuczera, G. E. Parent, 1998. Monte Carlo Assessment of Parameter Uncertainty in Conceptual Catchment Models: The Metropolis Algorithm. Journal of Hydrology 211 : 69 85.
16. Lee, G.F. S. Taylor, 1999. Results of Aquatic Life Toxicity Studies Conducted During 1997-1999 in the Upper Newport Bay Watershed and Review of Existing Water Quality Characteristics of Upper Newport Bay and its Watershed. USEPA 205(j) project report, El Macero, California.
17. Lee, G.F. S. Taylor, 2001. Results of Aquatic Toxicity Testing Conducted During 1999-2000 in the Upper Newport Bay Watershed. USEPA 319(h) project report, El Macero, California.
18. McBride, G.B. J.C. Ellis, 2001. Confidence of Compliance: A Bayesian Approach for Percentile Standards. Water Research 35 : 1117 1124.
19. Muleta, M.K. J.W. Nicklow, 2005. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Coupled With Automatic Calibration for a Distributed Watershed Model. Journal of Hydrology 306 : 127 145.
20. Nash, J.E. J.E. Sutcliffe, 1970. River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models: Part I. A Discussion of Principles. Journal of Hydrology 10 (3 282 290.
21. Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry J.R. Williams, 2001. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: User's Manual 2000. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas.
22. Pedersen, J.A., M.A. Yeager I.H. Suffet, 2006. Organophosphorus Insecticides in Agricultural and Residential Runoff: Field Observations and Implications for Total Maximum Daily Load Development. Environmental Science and Technology 40 (7 2120 2127.
23. SARWQCB (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board 2003. Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos TMDL, Upper Newport Bay and San Diego Creek. Report of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.
24. SARWQCB (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board 2005. Newport Bay Watershed Diazinon/Chlorpyrifos TMDL, Annual Report for 2004. Annual report of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.
25. Siepmann, S. B. Findlayson, 2000. Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon and Chorpyrifos. California Department of Fish and Game, Administrative Report 00-3, Rancho Cordova, California.
26. Sohrabi, T.M., A. Shirmohammadi, T.W. Chu, H. Montas A.P. Nejadhashemi, 2003. Uncertainty Analysis of Hydrologic and Water Quality Predictions for a Small Watershed Using SWAT2000. Environmental Forensics 4 : 229 238.
27. Systech Engineering, 2001. Watershed Analysis Risk Management Framework (WARMF): Update One: A Decision Support System for Watershed Analysis and Total Maximum Daily Load Calculation, Allocation and Implementation. Report 1005181, EPRI, Palo Alto, California.
28. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2001. Diazinon Revised Risk Assessment and Agreement With Registrants. January 2001.
29. Wang, P. A.A. Keller, 2007. AgInput: An Agricultural Nutrient and Pesticide Source Model. Environmental Modeling and Assessment doi :.
30. Zhang, H.X. S.L. Yu, 2004. Applying the First-Order Error Analysis in Determining the Margin of Safety for Total Maximum Daily Load Computations. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE 130 (6 664 673.
31. Zheng, Y. A.A. Keller, 2006. Understanding Parameter Sensitivity and its Management Implications in Watershed-Scale Water Quality Modeling. Water Resources Research 42 : W05402, doi :.
32. Zheng, Y. A.A. Keller, 2007a. Uncertainty Assessment in Watershed-Scale Water Quality Modeling and Management: 1. Framework and Application of Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) Approach. Water Resources Research 43 : W08407, doi :.
33. Zheng, Y. A.A. Keller, 2007b. Uncertainty Assessment in Watershed-Scale Water Quality Modeling and Management: 2. Management Objectives Constrained Analysis of Uncertainty (MOCAU). Water Resource Research 43 : W08408, doi :.