Erratum (DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.045);Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 196, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 975-982

  Knudson, Kelly ^a   Raeburn, Christopher D ^a   McIntyre Jr , Robert C ^a   Shaw, Raj J ^b   Chen, Yang K ^b   Brown, William R ^c   Stiegmann, Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Management; Operative; Perforation

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT INJURY; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMORBIDITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; FEVER; HEPATOJEJUNOSTOMY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE PERFORATION; LABORATORY TEST; LENGTH OF STAY; LEUKOCYTOSIS; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; ODDI SPHINCTER; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS INJURY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; STENT; SURGERY; T TUBE; TACHYCARDIA; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 57449109503     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (22)

1. Christensen M., Matzen P., Schulze S., et al. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60 (2004) 721-731
2. Elfant A.B., Bourke M.J., Alhalel R., et al. A prospective study of the safety of endoscopic therapy for choledocholithiasis in an outpatient population. Am J Gastroenterol 91 (1996) 1499-1502
3. Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335 (1996) 909-918
4. Loperfido S., Angelini G., Benedetti G., et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998) 1-10
5. Masci E., Toti G., Mariani A., et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 417-423
6. Suissa A., Yassin K., Lavy A., et al. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: a prospective single center study. Hepato Gastroenterol 52 (2005) 352-355
7. Vandervoort J., Soetikno R.M., Tham T.C., et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 652-656
8. Cohen S., Bacon B.R., Berlin J.A., et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14-16, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 803-809
9. Fatima J., Baron T.H., Topazian M.D., et al. Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management. Arch Surg 142 (2007) 448-454 discussion: 454-5.
10. Livingston E.H., and Rege R.V. Technical complications are rising as common duct exploration is becoming rare. J Am Coll Surg 201 (2005) 426-433
11. Enns R., Eloubeidi M.A., Mergener K., et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy 34 (2002) 293-298
12. Wilkinson M.L., Engelman J.L., and Hanson P.J. Intestinal perforation after ERCP in Billroth II partial gastrectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 40 (1994) 389-390
13. Sherman S., Ruffolo T.A., Hawes R.H., et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 101 (1991) 1068-1075
14. Hasan A.G., and Brown W.R. A model for mortality-morbidity conferences in gastroenterology. Gastrointest Endosc 67 (2008) 515-518
15. Mahnke D., Chen Y.K., Antillon M.R., et al. A prospective study of complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound in an ambulatory endoscopy center. Clin. Gastroenterol Hepatol 4 (2006) 924-930
16. Assalia A., Suissa A., Ilivitzki A., et al. Validity of clinical criteria in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related duodenal perforations. Arch Surg 142 (2007) 1059-1064
17. Bell R.C., Van Stiegmann G., Gogg J., et al. Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am Surg 57 (1991) 237-240
18. Stapfer M., Selby R.R., Stain S.C., et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 232 (2000) 191-198
19. Howard T.J., Tan T., Lehman G.A., et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 126 (1999) 658-663 discussion: 664-5.
20. de Vries J.H., Duijm L.E., Dekker W., et al. CT before and after ERCP: detection of pancreatic pseudotumor, asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforation, and duodenal diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 45 (1997) 231-235
21. Genzlinger J.L., McPhee M.S., Fisher J.K., et al. Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 94 (1999) 1267-1270
22. Kuhlman J.E., Fishman E.K., Milligan F.D., et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy: computed tomographic evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol 14 (1989) 127-132