Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: Diagnosis and management

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 142, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 448-454

  Fatima, Javairiah ^a   Baron, Todd H ^a   Topazian, Mark D ^a   Houghton, Scott G ^a   Iqbal, Corey W ^a   Ott, Beverly J ^a   Farley, David R ^a   Farnell, Michael B ^a   Sarr, Michael G ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; BILE DUCT DILATATION; BILE DUCT INJURY; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMORBIDITY; DUODENUM PERFORATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEVER; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; LENGTH OF STAY; LEUKOCYTOSIS; PANCREAS INJURY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BILE DUCTS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DUODENUM; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DUCTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; WOUNDS, PENETRATING;

EID: 34249018563     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: 15383644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.142.5.448     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Preetha M, Chung YF, Chan WH, et al. Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:1011-1014.
2. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:417-423.
3. Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:633-638.
4. Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Milligan FD, Siegelman SS. Complications of endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy: computed tomographic evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol. 1989;14:127-132.
5. Huguet JM, Sempere J, Bort I, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients aged more than 90 years old [in Spanish]. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;28:263-266.
6. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:721-731.
7. Suissa A, Yassin K, Lavy A, et al. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: a prospective single center study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:352-355.
8. Booth FV, Doerr RJ, Khalafi RS, Luchette FA, Flint LM Jr. Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy. Am J Surg. 1990;159:132-135.
9. Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232:191-198.
10. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383-393.
11. Bell RC, Van Stiegmann G, Goff J, Reveille M, Norton L, Pearlman NW. Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am Surg. 1991;57:237-240.
12. Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K, et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy. 2002;34:293-298.
13. Pungpapong S, Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R, Kullavanijaya P. Experience on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at tertiary referral center in Thailand: risks and complications. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:238-246.
14. Schutz SM, Abbott RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:535-539.
15. Johanson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, et al. Quality assessment of ERCP. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:165-169.
16. Baron TH, Petersen BT, Mergener K, et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:892-897.
17. Scarlett PY, Falk GL. The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994;64:843-846.
18. Snyder WH III, Weigelt JA, Watkins WL, Bietz DS. The surgical management of duodenal trauma: precepts based on a review of 247 cases. Arch Surg. 1980;115:422-429.
19. Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM. Factors influencing outcome after blunt duodenal injury. J Trauma. 1975;15:839-846.
20. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery. 1999;126:658-663.
21. Sarr MG, Fishman EK, Milligan FD, Siegelman SS, Cameron JL. Pancreatitis or duodenal perforation after peri-Vaterian therapeutic endoscopic procedures: diagnosis, differentiation, and management. Surgery. 1986;100:461-466.
22. Vaira D, Dowsett JF, Hatfield AR, et al. Is duodenal diverticulum a risk factor for sphincterotomy? Gut. 1989;30:939-942.
23. Sandha GS, Bourke MJ, Haber GB, Kortan PP. Endoscopic therapy for bile leak based on a new classification: results in 207 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:567-574.
24. Davids PH, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Postoperative bile leakage: endoscopic management. Gut. 1992;33:1118-1122.
25. Ryan ME, Geenen JE, Lehman GA, et al. Endoscopic intervention for biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter review. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:261-266.
26. Nam JS, Yi SY. Massive pneumoperitoneum and pneumomediastinum with subcutaneous emphysema after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:xxii.
27. Baron TH, Gostout CJ, Herman L. Hemoclip repair of a sphincterotomy- induced duodenal perforation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:566-568.
28. Mutignani M, Iacopinin F, Dokas S, et al. Successful endoscopic closure of a lateral duodenal perforation at ERCP with fibrin glue. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63:725-727.