Social annotations in digital library collections

D-Lib Magazine

Volumn 14, Issue 11-12, 2008, Pages

  Gazan, Rich ^a  

^a University of Hawai'i at Manoa   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349176078     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10829873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1045/november2008-gazan     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ackerman, Mark S. (1994). Providing Social Interaction in the Digital Library. Proceedings of Digital Libraries '94: First Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (College Station, TX), 198-200.
2. Agosti, Maristella and Nicola Ferro (2003). Annotations: Enriching a Digital Library. In Panos Constantopoulos and Ingeborg T. Sølvberg, editors. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Proceedings of the European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2003), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Heidelberg et al., 2003. Springer, 88-100.
3. Ames, Morgan and Mor Naaman (2007). Why We Tag: Motivations for Annotation in Mobile and Online Media. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, 971-980.
4. Arko, Robert A., Kathryn M. Ginger, Kim A. Kastens and John Weatherley (2006). Using Annotations to Add Value to a Digital Library for Education. D-Lib Magazine, 12(5) .
5. Borgman, Christine L. (1999). What are Digital Libraries? Competing Visions. Information Processing and Management, 35(3), 227-243.
6. Day, Annette (2006). Using Social Bookmarks in an Academic Setting - Penn Tags. .
7. DELOS (2007). The DELOS Digital Library Reference Model: Foundations for Digital Libraries, version 0.96, (November 2007). .
8. Frommholz, Ingo (2006). What did the Others Say? Probabilistic Indexing and Retrieval Models in Annotationbased Discussions. TCDL Bulletin, 2(2). .
9. Gal, Uri, Youngjin Yoo and Richard J. Boland, Jr. (2004). The Dynamics of Boundary Objects, Social Infrastructures and Social Identities. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations. 4(4), 193-206. .
10. Golovchinsky, Gene, Morgan N. Price and Bill N. Schilit (1999). From Reading to Retrieval: Freeform Ink Annotations as Queries. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, CA, 19-25.
11. Lesk, Michael (1999). Expanding Digital Library Research: Media, Genre, Place and Subjects. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Digital Libraries 1999: ISDL'99, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, September 1999, 51-57.
12. Marshall, Catherine C. (1998). The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World. Paper Presented at the 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic: Successes and Failures of Digital Libraries, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, March 24, 1998.
13. Saracevic, Tefko (2000). Digital Library Evaluation: Toward an Evolution of Concepts. Library Trends, 49(3), 350-369.
14. Sherman, William H. (2008). Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
15. Star, Susan Leigh and James R. Griesemer (1989): Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.