Pareto analysis for the selection of classifier ensembles

GECCO'08: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 681-688

  Dos Santos, Eulanda M ^a   Sabourin, Robert ^a   Maupin, Patrick ^b  

^a ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

^b DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Classifier ensembles; Diversity measures; Ensemble selection; Pareto analysis

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

CLASSIFIER ENSEMBLES; CONFLICTING OBJECTIVES; DIVERSITY MEASURE; ENSEMBLE SELECTIONS; INDIVIDUAL CLASSIFIERS; MINIMIZING THE NUMBER OF; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; PARETO ANALYSIS;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 57349172056     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1389095.1389229     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. M. Aksela and J. Laaksonen. Using diversity of errors for selecting members of a committee classifier. Pattern Recognition, 39(4):608-623, 2006.
2. S. Ando and E. Suzuki. Distributed multi-objective ga for generating comprehensive pareto front in deceptive optimization problems. In Proceedings of the IEEE CEC, pages 1569-1576, 2006.
3. G. Brown, J. Wyatt, R. Harris, and X. Yao. Diversity creation methods: a survey and categorisation. Information Fusion, 6(1):5-20, 2005.
4. K. Deb. Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, LTD, 2001.
5. K. Deb. Unveiling innovative design principles by means of multiple conflicting objectives. Engineering Optimization, 35(5):445-470, 2003.
6. B. Gabrys and D. Ruta. Genetic algorithms in classifier fusion. Applied Soft Computing, 6(4):337-347, 2006.
7. L. Kuncheva and C. Whitaker. Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles an their relationship with the ensemble accuracy. Machine Learning, 51(2): 181-207, 2003.
8. L. Oliveira, R. Sabourin, F. Bortolozzi, and C. Suen. Automatic recognition of handwritten numerical strings: A recognition and verification strategy. IEEE TPAMI, 24(11):1438-1454, 2002.
9. F. Roli, G. Giacinto, and G. Vernazza. Methods for designing multiple classifier systems. In Proceedings of MCS, pages 78-87, 2001.
10. D. Ruta and B. Gabrys. Classifier selection for majority voting. Information Fusion, 6(1):163-168, 2005.
11. G. Tremblay, R. Sabourin, and P. Maupin. Optimizing nearest neighbour in random subspaces using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of ICPR, pages 208-211, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
12. C. Whitaker and L. Kuncheva. Examining the relationship between majority vote accuracy and diversity in bagging and boosting. Technical report, School of Informatics, Unversity of Wales, 2003.
13. J. Wu and S. Azarm. Metrics for quality assessment of a multiobjective design optimization solution set. Transactions ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, 123:18-25, 2001.
14. G. Zenobi and P. Cunningham. Using diversity in preparing ensembles of classifiers based on differente feature subsets to minimize generalization error. In Proceedings of XII European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 576-587, Freiburg, Germany, 2001.