User evaluation in pervasive healthcare

Pervasive Computing in Healthcare

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 243-274

  Adlam, Tim ^a   Orpwood, Roger ^a   Dunn, Teresa ^a  

^a Bath Institute of Medical Engineering   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349165313     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Adlam, T. et al. The installation and support of internationally distributed equipment for people with dementia. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 8, 253, 2004.
2. Bardram, J. Hospitals of the Future-Ubiquitous Computing Support for Medical Work in Hospitals. UbiHealth 2003, Seattle, http://www.pervasivehealthcare.com/ubicomp2003/papers/(accessed December 2005).
3. Consolvo, S., Roessler, P., and Shelton, B. The CareNet display: lessons learned from an in-home evaluation of an ambient display. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of UbiComp, N. Davies, E. Mynatt, and I. Siio, eds., Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2004.
4. Fishkin, K. et al. Ubiquitous computing support for skills assessment in medical school. UbiHealth 2004, Nottingham, http://www.pervasivehealthcare.com/ubicomp2004/papers/(accessed December 2005).
5. Howe, D. The free on-line dictionary of computing. http://www.foldoc.org/(accessed November 2004).
6. Beckmann, C., Consolvo, S., and LaMarca, A. Some assembly required:supporting end-user sensor installation in domestic ubiquitous computing environments. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of UbiComp, N. Davies, E. Mynatt, and I. Siio, eds., Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2004.
7. Gilliard, J. and Hagen, I. Enabling technologies for people with dementia- cross-national analysis report. European Commission document number QLK6-CT-2000-00653, August 2004, http://www.enableproject.org (accessed December 2005).
8. Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., and Ska, B. The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. In Technology and Disability: The Assessment of Assistive Technology Outcomes, Effects and Costs, G.J. Gelderblom and L. de Witte, eds., Amsterdam:IOS Press, 2002.
9. Jutai, J. and Day, H. Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). In Technology and Disability: The Assessment of Assistive Technology Outcomes, Effects and Costs, G.J. Gelderblom and L. de Witte, eds., Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2002.
10. Brod, M., Stewart, A.L., Sands, L., and Walton, P. Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: the dementia quality of life instrument. The Gerontologist, 39, 1999, p. 25.
11. Maulsby, D., Greenberg, S., and Mander, R. Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz. Proc. InterChi93, 1993, 277.
12. Gould, J.D, Conti, T., and Hovanyecz, T. Composing letters with a simulated listening typewriter. Proc. ACM CHI '82, 1982, 367.
13. Wilson, J. and Rosenberg, D. Rapid prototyping for human interface design. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, ed., New York:North Holland, 1988.
14. Consolvo, S. and Towle, J. Evaluating an ambient display for the home. Proc. CHI2005, ACM, Portland, Oregon, 2005.
15. Orpwood, R. Design methodology for aids for the disabled. J. Med. Eng. Technology, 14, 2, 1990.
16. U.K. NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency Evaluation Service (NHS PASA). http://www.pasa.nhs.uk/evaluation/(accessed April 2006).
17. U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). http://www.mhra.gov.uk/(accessed April 2006).
18. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Device Evaluation. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/(accessed April 2006).