Evaluation of substrates for 90° peel adhesion - A collaborative study. II. Transdermal drug delivery systems

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 61-65

  Wokovich, Anna M ^a   Brown, Stanley A ^b   Shen, Meiyu ^a   Doub, William H ^a   Cai, Bing ^a   Sadrieh, Nakissa ^a   Mei, Ling Chen ^a   Machado, Stella ^a   Buhse, Lucinda F ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Patch; Peel; Skin; Transdermal system

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES; DWELL TIMES; FENTANYL; HIGH DENSITIES; HUMAN CADAVER SKINS; PATCH; PEEL; PEEL ADHESIONS; PEEL ANGLES; TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM;

ADHESION; CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY; DRUG DELIVERY; SKIN; STAINLESS STEEL;

SUBSTRATES;

CLONIDINE; ESTRADIOL; FENTANYL; STAINLESS STEEL;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; QUALITY CONTROL; SURGICAL TAPE; TRANSDERMAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

ADHESIVENESS; ADMINISTRATION, CUTANEOUS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CADAVER; CELL ADHESION; CLONIDINE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; ESTRADIOL; FENTANYL; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYETHYLENE; QUALITY CONTROL; SKIN; SURGICAL TAPE;

EID: 57349106451     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31149     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Wokovich AM, Prodduturi S, Doub WH, Hussain AS, Buhse LF. Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) adhesion as a critical safety, efficacy and quality attribute. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006;64:1-8.
2. Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Montanari L. Evaluation of adhesive properties of patches based on acrylic matrices. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25:1-6.
3. Satas D. Peel. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology, 3rd ed. Warwick, Rhode Island: Satas & Associates; 1999. pp 62-86.
4. Spencer TS, Smith SE, Conjeevaram S. Adhesive interactions between polymers and skin in transdermal delivery systems. Polym Mater Sci Eng 1990;63:337-339.
5. Steven-Fountain AJ, Atkins AG, Jeronimidis G, Vincent JFV, Farrar DF, Chivers RA. The effect of flexible substrates on pressure-sensitive adhesive performance. Int J Adhes Adhes 2002;22:423-430.
6. American Society of Testing Materials. ASTM Standard D 3330/D 3330M. Standard test method for peel adhesion of pressure-sensitive tape. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, www.astm.org; 2002.
7. Pressure Sensitive Tape Council. PSTC 101 test method: Peel adhesion of pressure sensitive tape. In: Test Methods for Pressure Sensitive Tapes, 14th ed. Northbrook, IL: Pressure Sensitive Tape Council; 2004. pp 101.1-101.10.
8. Wokovich AM, Brown SA. In-vitro test method development for determining transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) adhesion. Presented at the FDA Science Forum at Washington Convention Center, Washington, DC, 2005.
9. Cai B, McMaster F, McDonough J, Sadrieh N, Brown S, Wokovich AM, Doub WH, Buhse LF, Schwartz P, Patel R, Chen ML. Development of in vitro peel adhesion testing for transdermal drug delivery system. Presented at the FDA Science Forum at Washington Convention Center, Washington, DC, 2006.
10. Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A. Measuring adhesive performance in transdermal delivery systems. Am J Drug Deliv 2004;2:193-206.
11. Auchter G, Aydin O, Zetti A, Satas D. Acrylic adhesives. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology, 3rd ed. Warwick, Rhode Island: Satas & Associates; 1999. pp 444-514.
12. Ulman KL, Thomas X. Silicone pressure sensitive adhesives for healthcare applications. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology, 3rd ed. Warwick, Rhode Island: Satas & Associates; 1999. pp 724-747.