Hemodynamic impact of mitral prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary hypertension: An in silico study

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1916-1926

  Tanné, David ^a,b   Kadem, Lyes ^c   Rieu, Régis ^b   Pibarot, Philippe ^a  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

Effective orifice area; Heart valve; Lumped model; Mitral flow; Pulmonary resistance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER MODEL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA; EXERCISE INTENSITY; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART OUTPUT; LUNG ARTERY PRESSURE; LUNG COMPLIANCE; LUNG HEMODYNAMICS; LUNG RESISTANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; PARAMETER; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS PATIENT MISMATCH; PULMONARY HYPERTENSION; REST; SIMULATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THERAPEUTIC ERROR; VALIDITY;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXERCISE; HEART ATRIA; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION, PULMONARY; MITRAL VALVE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PULMONARY ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REST;

EID: 57349096723     PISSN: 87507587     EISSN: 15221601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90572.2008     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abbas AE, Fortuin FD, Schiller NB, Appleton CP, Moreno CA, Lester SJ. A simple method for noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol 41: 1021-1027, 2003.
2. Bonow RO, Carabello B, Chatterjee K, De Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 48: 1-148, 2006.
3. Bonow RO, Cheitlin MD, Crawford MH, Douglas PS. Task Force 3: valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 45: 1334-1340, 2005.
4. Cortese DA. Pulmonary function in mitral stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc 53: 321-326, 1978.
5. Crawford MH, Souchek J, Oprian CA, Miller DC, Rahimtoola SH, Giacomini JC, Sethi G, Hammermeister KE. Determinants of survival and left ventricular performance after mitral valve replacement. Circulation 81: 1173-1181, 1990.
6. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and application of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 16: 637-643, 1990.
7. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of mitral prosthetic valvular areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 65: 1443-1448, 1990.
8. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 6: S34-S38, 1992.
9. Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation 91: 1022-1028, 1995.
10. Finkelhor RS, Yang SX, Bosich G, Bahler RC. Unexplained pulmonary hypertension is associated with systolic arterial hypertension in patients undergoing routine Doppler echocardiography. Chest 123: 71-715, 2003.
11. Flachskampf FA, Rodriguez L, Chen C, Guerrero JL, Weyman AE, Thomas JD. Analysis of mitral inertance: a factor critical for early transmitral filling. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 6: 422-432, 1993.
12. Gamra H, Zhang HP, Allen JW, Lau FYK, Ruiz CE. Factors determining normalization of pulmonary vascular resistance following successful balloon mitral valvotomy. Am J Cardiol 83: 392-395, 1999.
13. Garcia D, Barenbrug PJC, Pibarot P, Dekker ALAJ, Van Der Veen FH, Maessen JG, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG. A ventricular-vascular coupling model in presence of aortic stenosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288: H1874-H1884, 2005.
14. Garcia D, Pibarot P, Durand LG. Analytical modeling of the instantaneous pressure gradient across the aortic valve. J Biomech 38: 1303-1311, 2005.
15. Korakianitis T, Shi Y. Numerical simulation of cardiovascular dynamics with healthy and diseased heart valves. J Biomech 39: 1964-1982, 2006.
16. Lam BK, Chan V, Hendry P, Ruel M, Masters R, Bedard P, Goldstein B, Rubens F, Mesana T. The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133: 1464-1473, 2007.
17. Lepeschkin E. Modern Electrocardiography. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1951.
18. Levine MJ, Weinstein JS, Diver DJ, Berman AD, Wyman RM, Cunningham MJ, Safian RD, Grossman W, McKay RG. Progressive improvement in pulmonary vascular resistance after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. Circulation 79: 1061-1067, 1989.
19. Li M, Dumesnil JG, Mathieu P, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure after mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 45: 1034-1040, 2005.
20. Lu K, Clark JW, Ghorbel FH, Ware DL, Bidani A. A human cardiopulmonary system model applied to the analysis of the Vasalva maneuver. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H2661-H2679, 2001.
21. Magne J, Mathieu P, Dumesnil JG, Tanné D, Dagenais F, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after mitral valve replacement. Circulation 115: 1417-1425, 2007.
22. Mahapatra S, Nishimura RA, Sorajja P, Cha S, McGoon MD. Relationship of pulmonary arterial capacitance and mortality in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 799-803, 2006.
23. Malouf JF, Enriquez-Sarano M, Bailey KR, Chandrasekaran K, Mullany CJ. Severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: clinical profile and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 40: 789-795, 2002.
24. McLaughlin VV, Rich S. Pulmonary hypertension. Curr Probl Cardiol 29: 575-634, 2004.
25. Otto CM. Mitral stenosis. In: Valvular Heart Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004, p. 247-271.
26. Otto CM, Davis KB, Reid CL, Slater JN, Kronzon I, Kisslo KB, Bashore TM. Relation between pulmonary artery pressure and mitral stenosis severity in patients undergoing balloon mitral commissurotomy. Am J Cardiol 71: 874-878, 1993.
27. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact and prevention. Heart 92: 1029, 2006.
28. Pibarot P, Magne J, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: back to reality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135: 464-465, 2008.
29. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 58: 20-24, 1978.
30. Sensaki H, Chen CH, Kass DA. Single-beat estimation of end-systolic pressure-volume relation in humans: a new method with the potential for noninvasive application. Circulation 94: 2497-2506, 1996.
31. Shandas R, Weinberg C, Ivy DD, Nicol E, DeGroff CG, Hertzberg J, Valdes-Cruz L. Development of a noninvasive ultrasound color M-mode means of estimating pulmonary vascular resistance in pediatric pulmonary hypertension: mathematical analysis, in vitro validation, and preliminary clinical studies. Circulation 104: 908-913, 2001.
32. Sun Y, Beshara M, Lucariello RJ, Chiaramida SA. A comprehensive model for right-left heart interaction under the influence of pericardium and baroreflex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H1499-H1515, 1997.
33. Sun Y, Sjoberg BJ, Ask P, Loyd D, Wranne B. Mathematical model that characterizes transmitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 268: H476-H489, 1995.
34. Szabo G, Soans D, Graf A, Beller CJ, Waite L, Hagl S. A new computer model of mitral valve hemodynamics during ventricular filling. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26: 239-247, 2004.
35. Thomas JD, Zhou J, Greenberg N, Bibawy G, McCarthy PM, Vandervoort PM. Physical and physiological determinants of pulmonary venous flow: numerical analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H2453-H2465, 1997.
36. Totaro P, Argano V. Patient-prosthesis mismatch after mitral valve replacement: myth or reality? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134: 697-701, 2007.
37. Tryka AF, Godleski JJ, Schoen FJ, Vandevanter SH. Pulmonary vascular disease and hypertension after valve surgery for mitral stenosis. Hum Pathol 16: 65-71, 1985.
38. Vandervoort PM, Greenberg N, Pu M, Powell KA, Cosgrove DM, Thomas JD. Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses: localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. Circulation 92: 3464-3472, 1995.
39. Zielinski T, Pogorzelska H, Rajecka A, Biedermavn A. Pulmonary hemodynamics at rest and effort, 6 and 12 mo after mitral valve replacement: a slow regression of effort pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol 42: 57-62, 1993.