Qualitative analysis of visualization: A building design field study

Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on BEyond Time and Errors: Novel EvaLuation Methods for Information Visualization 2008, BELIV'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Tory, Melanie ^a   Staub French, Sheryl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ethnographic field study; Evaluation; Long term study; Qualitative analysis; Visualization

Indexed keywords

BUILDING DESIGNS; ETHNOGRAPHIC FIELD STUDY; EVALUATION; FIELD STUDIES; LABORATORY STUDIES; LONG-TERM STUDY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSES; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS; WORK PRACTICES;

DATA VISUALIZATION; ERRORS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 57349094739     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1377966.1377975     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Bakis, N., Aouad, G., and Kagioglou, M. 2007. Towards distributed product data sharing environments - Progress so far and future challenges. Automation in Construction, 16, 5, 586-595.
2. Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Faisal, S., Cairns, P. and Blandford, A. 2006. Subjective Information Visualisations. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Combining Visualisation and Interaction to Facilitate Scientific Exploration and Discovery (London, UK, Sept. 11, 2006).
4. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, Chicago.
5. Jordan, B., and Henderson, A. 1995. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 1, 39-103.
6. Kobsa, A. 2001. An Empirical Comparison of Three Commercial Information Visualization Systems. In Proceedings of IEEE Symp. on Information Visualization (San Diego, CA, USA, Oct. 22-23, 2001), 123-130.
7. Kobsa, A. 2004. User Experiments with Tree Visualization Systems. In Proceedings of IEEE Symp. on Information Visualization (Austin, TX, USA, Oct. 10-12, 2004), 9-16.
8. Li, Q. and North, C. 2003. Empirical Comparison of Dynamic Query Sliders and Brushing Histograms. In Proceedings of IEEE Symp. on Information Visualization (Seattle, WA, USA, Oct. 19-21, 2003), 147-153.
9. th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (Stanford University, CA, USA, Aug. 14-16, 2000), 1293-1300.
10. th International Conference Information Visualization (Zurich, Switzerland, July 2-6, 2007), 74-80.
11. Messner, J.I., Riley, D.R., and Moeck, M. 2006. Virtual Facility Prototyping for Sustainable Project Delivery. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 11, 723-738.
12. Nekrasovski, D., Bodnar, A., McGrenere, J., Guimbretière, F., and Munzner, T. 2006. An Evaluation of Pan&Zoom and Rubber Sheet Navigation with and without an Overview. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, Apr. 22-27, 2006), 11-20.
13. Plaisant, C. 2004. The Challenge of Information Visualization Evaluation. In Proceedings of Advanced Visual Interfaces (Gallipoli, Italy, May 25-28, 2004), 109-116.
14. Rester, M., Pohl, M., Wiltner, S., Hinum, K., Miksch, S., Popow, C, and Ohmann, S. 2007. Mixing Evaluation Methods for Assessing the Utility of an Interactive InfoVis Technique. In J. Jacko (Ed.): Human-Computer Interaction, Part I, HCII (2007), 604-613.
15. Saraiya, P., North, C., and Duca, K. 2005. An Insight-Based Methodology for Evaluating Bioinformatics Visualizations. IEEE Trans. On Visualization and Computer Graphics, 11,4 (July / Aug. 2005), 443-456.
16. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C. 2006. Strategies for Evaluating Information Visualization Tools: Multidimensional In-depth Long-term Case Studies. In Proceedings of Beliv 2006 (Venice, Italy, May 23, 2006).
17. Staub-French, S. and Fischer, M. 2001. Industrial case study of electronic design, cost, and schedule integration. Technical Report No. 122, CIFE, Stanford University.
18. Tang, A. Tory, M., Po, B., Neumann, P., and Carpendale, S. 2006. Collaborative Coupling over Tabletop Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, Apr. 22-27, 2006), 1181-1190.
19. Tang, J.C. 1991. Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 143-160.
20. Tory, M., Kirkpatrick, A.E., Atkins, M.S., and Möller, T. 2006. Visualization Task Performance with 2D, 3D, and Combination Displays. IEEE Trans, on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 1, (Jan./Feb. 2006), 2-13.
21. Tory, M., Sprague, D.W., Wu, F., So, W.Y., and Munzner, T. 2007. Spatialization Design: Comparing Points and Landscapes, IEEE Trans, on Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proceedings of Information Visualization), 13, 6, (Nov./Dec. 2007), 1262-1269.
22. Tory, M., Staub-French, S., Po, B., and Wu, F. Physical and Digital Artifact-Mediated Coordination in Building Design, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), in print.