A clinical evaluation of all-ceramic bridges placed in UK general dental practices: First-year results

British Dental Journal

Volumn 205, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 477-482

  Crisp, R J ^a   Cowan, A J ^b   Lamb, J ^b   Thompson, O ^b   Tulloch, N ^b   Burke, F J T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT; YTTRIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL HEALTH SURVEYS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; RESIN CEMENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YTTRIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 57349088199     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.937     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Burke F J T, McCord J F. Research in dental practice - problems and solutions. Br Dent J 1993; 175: 396-398.
2. Hopkins L M A, Eaton K A. Research in general dental practice - what is involved? Part 1. General considerations. Prim Dent Care 1996; 3: 71-74.
3. Jones C S, Billington R W, Pearson G J. The advantages and disadvantages of running a clinical trial in general practices. Br Dent J 2004; 197: 311-313.
4. Burke F J T, Crisp R J, McCord J F. Research in dental practice: a 'SWOT' analysis. Dent Update 2002; 29: 80-87.
5. Wilson N F H, Mjör I A. Practice-based research: importance, challenges and prospects. A personal view. Prim Dent Care 1997; 4: 5-6.
6. Burke F J T, Wilson N F H. Introducing the PREP panel. Dent Pract 1994; 32: 30.
7. Crisp R J, Burke F J T. One-year clinical evaluation of compomer restorations placed in general practice. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 181-186.
8. Burke F J T, Crisp R J, Bell TJ, McDermott K et al. Two-year evaluation of restorations of a packable composite placed in UK general dental practices. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 293-296.
9. Burke F J T. Amalgam to tooth-coloured materialsimplications for clinical practice and dental education: government restrictions and amalgam-usage survey results. J Dent 2004; 32: 343-350.
10. Dental Practice Board. Digest of statistics, 2002/2003. DPB, Eastbourne, UK.
11. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1-25.
12. Sorensen J A. The Lava system for CAD/CAM production of high-strength precision fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Dent Technol 2003; 26: 57-67.
13. Curtis A R, Wright AJ, Fleming G J P. Thee in. uence of surface modi.cation techniques on the performance of a Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 2006; 34: 195-206.
14. Curtis A R, Wright AJ, Fleming G J P. The influence of simulated masticatory loading regimes on the bi-axial flexural strength and reliability of a Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 2006; 34: 317-325.
15. Pospiech P, Nothdurft F. A prospective study on the long-term behaviour of zirconia-based bridges (Lava): results after 3-years in service. J Dent Res 2004; 83 (Sp Iss B): 0230
16. Nothdurft F P, Rountree P R, Pospiech P R. Clinical long-term behaviour of zirconia-based bridges (Lava): five-year results. J Dent Res 2006; 85 (Sp Iss C): 0312.
17. Burke F J T, Crisp R J, Richter B. Handling evaluation of a self-adhesive universal resin cement by UK dental practitioners. Int Dent J 2006; 56: 142-146.
18. Koehler K, Sadan A, Burgess J O, Blatz M B. Resin bond to Lava zirconia intaglio surface. J Dent Res 2003; 82 (Sp Iss A): 1650.
19. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-357.
20. Scurria M S, Bader J D, Shugars D A. Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutment. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 459-464.
21. Taskonak B, Sertgoz A. Two-year clinical evaluation of lithia-disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1008-1013.
22. Olsson K, Furst B, Andersson B, Carlsson G E. A long term retrospective study and clinical follow-up study of In-ceram alumina FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 131-135.
23. Raigrodski A J, Chiche G J, Potiket N, Hochstedler J L et al. Clinical ef.ciency of Y-TZP based posterior fixed partial dentures. J Dent Res 2005; 84 (Sp Iss A): 0226.
24. Bornemann G, Rinke S, Huels A. Prospective clinical trial with conventionally luted zirconia-based fixed partial dentures - 18 month results. J Dent Res 2003 abstract #842.
25. Aboushelib M N, Kleverlaan C J, Feilzer A J. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 857-863.
26. Roberts D H. The failure of retainers of fixed bridge prostheses. Br Dent J 1970; 128: 117-124.
27. Palmqvist S, Schwarz B. Artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures 18-23 years after placement. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6: 279-285.
28. Bergenholtz G. Iatrogenic injury to the pulp in dental procedures: aspects of pathogenesis, management and preventive measures. Int Dent J 1991; 41: 99-110
29. Jackson C R, Skidmore A E, Rice R T. Pulpal evaluation of teeth restored with fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1992: 67: 323-325.