Poisson approximation for significance in genome-wide ChIP-chip tiling arrays

Bioinformatics

Volumn 24, Issue 24, 2008, Pages 2825-2831

  Zhang, Yu ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA SEQUENCE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ALGORITHMS; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; GENOME; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 57249114511     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn549     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aldous,D. (1989) Probability Approximations via the Poisson Clumping Heuristic. Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Arratia,R. et al. (1990) Poisson approximation and the Chen-Stein method. Stat. Sci., 5, 403-424.
3. Benjamini,Y and Hochberg,Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Star. Soc. Ser. B, 57, 289-300.
4. Bernstein,B.E. et al. (2002) Methylation of histrine H3 Lys 4 in coding regions of active genes. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA, 99 8695-8700.
5. Cawley,S. et al. (2004) Unbiased mapping of transcription factor binding sites along human chromosomes 21 and 22 points to widespread regulation of noncoding RNAs. Cell, 116, 499-509.
6. Chen,L.H.Y (1975) Poisson approximation for dependent trials. Ann. Probab., 3, 534-545.
7. Du,J. et al. (2006) A supervised hidden Markov model framework for efficiently segmenting tiling array data in transcriptional and ChIP-chip experiments: Systematically incorporating validated biological knowledge. Bioinformatics, 22, 3016-3024.
8. Genz,A. (1992) Numerical computation of multivariate normal probabilities. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 1, 141-150
9. Huang,Y. et al. (2006) To permute or not to permute. Bioinformatics, 22, 2244-2248.
10. Iyer,V. et al. (2001) Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF. Nature, 409, 533-538.
11. Ji,H. and Woug,W.H. (2005) TileMap: Create chromosomal map of tiling array hybridizations. Bioinformatics, 21, 3629-3636.
12. Johnson,D.S. et al. (2008) Systematic evaluation of variability in ChIP-chip experiments using predefined DNA targets. Genome Res., 18, 393-403.
13. Keles,S. et al. (2006) Multiple testing methods for ChIP-Chip high density oligonucleotide array data. J. Comput. Biol., 13, 579-613.
14. Li,W. et al. (2005) A hidden Markov model for analyzing ChIP-chip experiments on genome tiling arrays and its application to p53 binding sequences. Bioinfomatics, 21 (Suppl. 1), i274-i282.
15. Lin,D.Y. (2005) An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies. Bioinformatics, 21 781-787.
16. Liu,J.S. (2001) Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer, New York.
17. Marioni,J.C. (2006) BioHMM: A heterogeneous hidden Markov model for segmenting array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 22, 1144-1146.
18. Qi,Y. et al. (2006) High-resolution computational models for genome binding events. Nat. Biotechnol., 24, 963-970.
19. Ren,B. et al. (2000) Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science, 290, 2306-2309.
20. Waterman,M.S. and Vingron,M. (1994) Sequence comparison significance and Poisson approximation. Star. Sci., 9, 367-381.
21. Zheng,M. et al. (2007) ChIP-chip: Data, model, and analysis. Biometrics., 63, 787-796.