Monogamy of non-local quantum correlations

Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 465, Issue 2101, 2009, Pages 59-69

  Toner, Ben ^a,b  

^a CWI   (Netherlands)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bell inequality; Interactive proof systems; Non locality; Quantum

Indexed keywords

BELLS; CRYPTOGRAPHY;

ARBITRARY DIMENSIONS; BELL INEQUALITIES; BELL INEQUALITY; ENTANGLED QUANTUM STATES; INTERACTIVE PROOF SYSTEMS; LINEAR PROGRAMME; NEW TECHNIQUES; NON-LOCALITY; QUANTUM; QUANTUM CORRELATIONS; QUANTUM VALUES; UPPER BOUNDS;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

EID: 57249111583     PISSN: 13645021     EISSN: 14712946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2008.0149     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Acín, A., Gisin, N. & Masanes, L. 2006 From Bell's theorem to secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120-405. (doi:10.1103/PhysRcvLctt.97.120405)
2. Barrett, J., Hardy, L. & Kent, A. 2005 No signaling and quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010-503. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.95.010503)
3. Bell, J. S. 1964 On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195-200.
4. Boyd, S. & Vandenberghe, L. 2004 Convex optimization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, (http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/)
5. Braunstein, S. & Caves, C. 1990 Wringing out better Bell inequalities. Ann. Phys. (NY) 202, 22-56. (doi:10.1016/0003- 4916(90)90339-P)
6. Buhrman, H. & Massar, S. 2004 Causality and Cirel'son bounds. (http://arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0409066)
7. Cirel'son, B. S. 1980 Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality. Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93-100. (doi:10.1007/BF00417500)
8. Clauser, J. F., Home, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. 1969 Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880-884. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880)
9. Cleve, R., H0yer, P., Toner, B. & Watrous, J. 2004 Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies. In Proc. 19th IEEE Conf. on Computational Complexity (CCC 2004), PP- 236-249. (http://arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0404076)
10. Cleve, R., Slofstra, W., Unger, F. & Upadhyay, S. 2007 Perfect parallel repetition theorem for quantum XOR proof systems. In Proc. 22nd IEEE Conf. on Computational Complexity (CCC 2007), pp. 109-114.
11. Coffman, V., Kundu, J. & Wootters, W. K. 2000 Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052-306. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.C1. 052306)
12. Doherty, A, C., Liang. Y.-C., Toner. B. & Wehner, S. 2008 The quantum moment problem and bounds on entangled multi-prover games. In Proc. 23rd IEEE Conf. on Computational Complexity (CCC 2004). (http://arXiv.org/abs/ 0803.4373)
13. Feige, U., Kindler, G. & O'Donnell, R. 2007 Understanding parallel repetition requires understanding foams. In Proc. 22nd IEEE Conf. on Computational Complexity {CCC 2007), pp. 179-192.
14. Kenipe. J., Kobayashi, H., Matsumoto, K., Toner, B. & Vidiek, T. In press. Entangled games are hard to approximate. In Proc. 49th IEEE Syrup. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2008). (http://arXiv.org/abs/0704. 2903)
15. Masanes, L. 2005 Extremal quantum correlations for N parties with two dichotomic obscrvables per site. See http://arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0512100.
16. Masanes, L., Acín, A. & Gisin, N. 2006 General properties of nonsignaling theories. Phys. Rev. A 73, 012-112. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012112)
17. Navascués, M., Pironio, S. & Acín, A. 2007 Bounding the set of quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010-401. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.010401)
18. Navascués, M., Pironio, S. & Acín, A. 2008 A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs cnaractc rizing the set of quantum correlations. New J. Phys. 10, 073-013. (http://arXiv.org/abs/ 0803.4290)
19. Popescu, S. & Rohrlich, D. 1994 Nonlocality as an axiom. Found. Phys. 24, 379. (doi:10.1007/BF02058098)
20. Raz, R. In press. A counterexample to strong parallel repetition. In Proc. 49th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2008). ECCC report TR08-018.
21. Scarani, V. & Gisin, N. 2001 Quantum communication between n partners and Bell's inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 117-901. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.117901)
22. Terhal, B. M., Doherty, A. C. & Schwab, D. 2003 Symmetric extensions of quantum states and local hidden variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 157-903. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90. 157903)
23. Toner, B. F. & Verstraete, F. 2006 Monogamy of Bell correlations and Tsirelson's bound. (http://arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0611001)
24. Tsirelson, B. S. 1987 Quantum analogues of the Bell inequalities. The case of two spatially separated domains. J. Sov. Math. 36, 557-570. (doi:10.1007/BF01C63472)
25. Werner, R. F. 1989 An application of Bell's inequalities to a quantum state extension problem. Lett. Math. Phys. 17, 359-363. (doi:10.1007/BF00399761)