An information retrieval approach to ontology mapping

Data and Knowledge Engineering

Volumn 58, Issue 1 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 47-69

  Su, Xiaomeng ^a   Gulla, Jon Atle ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Linguistic analysis; Ontology mapping; Semantic heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; INTEROPERABILITY; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

ONTOLOGY MAPPING; SEMANTIC ENRICHMENT; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 33646244751     PISSN: 0169023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2005.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. K. Aas, L. Eikvil, Text categorisation: a survey, Technical report, Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, 1999.
2. R. Agrawal, R. Srikant, On integrating catalogs, in: Proceeding of the WWW-11, Hong Kong, 2001.
3. Baeze-Yates R., and Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern Information Retrieval (1999), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
4. Batini C., and Lenzerini M. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computer Surveys 18 4 (1986)
5. Bergamaschi S., Castano S., and Vincini M. Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources. SIGMOD Record 28 1 (1999) 54-59
6. Berners-Lee T. The semantic web. Scientific American 284 5 (2001) 35-43
7. T. Brasethvik, Conceptual modelling for domain specific document description and retrieval-An approach to semantic document modelling, Ph.D. thesis, IDI, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2004.
8. Brasethvik T., and Gulla J.A. Natural language analysis for semantic document modeling. Data and Knowledge Engineering 38 1 (2001) 45-62
9. J. Didion, Jwnl (java wordnet library), Available from: , 2004.
10. H.H. Do, E. Rahm, Coma-a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches, in: Proceedings of the 28th VLDB Conference, 2002.
11. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, A. Halevy, Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web, in: Proceedings of WWW-2002, 11th International WWW Conference, Hawaii, 2002.
12. DublinCore. Available from: .
13. Fellbaum C. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database (1998), MIT Press
14. Fensel D., Ding Y., Omelayenko B., Schulten E., Botquin G., Brown M., and Flett A. Product data integration in b2b e-commerce. IEEE Intelligent Systems (Special Issue on Intelligent E-Business) 16 4 (2001) 54-59
15. N. Fridman, M.A. Musen, Prompt: algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment, in: Proceedings of Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), 2000.
16. Google. Available from: , 2004.
17. J. Madhavan, P. Bernstein, E. Rahm, Generic schema matching using cupid, in: Proceedings of Very Large Database Conference (VLDB) 2001, 2001.
18. T.W. Malone, K. Crowston, J. Lee, B. Pentland, Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes, Technical Report 141, MIT, 1993.
19. D. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, S. Wilder, An environment for merging and testing large ontologies, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, CO, USA, 2000.
20. Mena E., Illarramendi A., Kashyap V., and Sheth A.P. Observer: an approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperation across pre-exist ontologies. International journal on distributed and parallel databases 8 2 (2000) 223-271
21. G.A. Miller, Wizard of the new wordsmiths: his idea to link words rewrote the dictionary, the star ledger, January 2002.
22. L. Palopoli, G. Terracina, D. Ursino, The system dike: towards the semi-automatic synthesis of cooperative information systems and data warehouses, in: ADBIS-DASFAA Symposium 2000, Matfyz Press, 2000, pp. 108-117.
23. Rahm E., and Bernstein P.A. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal 10 (2001) 334-350
24. P. Resnik, Wordnet and distributionaly analysis: a class-based approach to lexical discovery, in: Statistically based Natural Language Processing Techniques: Papers from the 1992 AAAI Workshop, AAAI Press, 1992.
25. RML. Referent modelling language. Available from: .
26. Salton G., and McGill M.J. An Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval (1983), McGraw-Hill, NY
27. Sølvberg A. Data and what they refer to. In: Chen P.P. (Ed). Concept Modeling: Historical Perspectives and Future Trends (1998), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
28. G. Stumme, A. Maedche, Fca-merge: Bottom-up merging of ontologies, in: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI01, Seattle, USA, 2001.
29. X. Su, L. Ilebrekke, A comparative study of ontology languages and tools. in: Proceedings of the Seventh IFIP-WG8.1 International Workshop on Evaluating of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'02), 2002.
30. Valente A., Russ T., MacGrecor R., and Swartout W. Building and (re)using an ontology for air campaign planning. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14 1 (1999) 27-36