Consultations of stakeholders on the roles of research in relation to genetically modified plants in France

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 91-102

  Ricroch, Agnès ^a   Jésus, Franck ^a  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57149115965     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662507078015     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abma, T.A. (2000) " Stakeholder Conflict: a Case Study, " Evaluation and Program Planning 23 (2). 199-210.
2. Babbie, E.R. (1992) The Practice of Social Research, 6 th edn. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
3. Babusiaux, C., Le Déaut, J.Y., Sicard, D. and Testard, J. (2002) Rapport à la suite du débat sur les OGM et les essais au champ. Paris: MATE.
4. Barling, D. (1999) " The Social Aspects of Food Biotechnology: a European View, " Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 7 (2). 85-93.
5. Bonny, S. (2003) " Why are Most Europeans Opposed to GMOs? Factors Explaining Rejection in France and Europe, " Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 6 (1). 50-71. URL: http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol6/ issue1/full/4
6. Campbell, S. and Townsend, E. (2003) " Flaws Undermine Results of UK Biotech Debate, " Nature 425: 559.
7. De Marchi, B. and Ravetz, J.R. (1999) " Risk Management and Governance: a Post-normal Science Approach, " Futures 31: 743-57.
8. Edmunds, D. and Wollenberg, E. (2001) " A Strategic Approach to Multi-stakeholder Negotiation, " Development and Change 32 (2). 231-53.
9. European Commission (EC) (2002) TRUSTNET 2-Towards Inclusive Governance of Hazardous Activities. Brussels: European Commission-Science, Research, Development.
10. Funtowicz, S.O., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G. and Ravetz, J.R. (1999) Information Tools for Environmental Policy under Conditions of Complexity. Environmental Issues Series no. 9. Copenhagen: Europe Environment Agency (EEA).
11. Gaskell, G., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Corchero, C., Fischler, C., Hampel, J., Jackson, J., Kronberger, N., Mejlgaard, N., Revuelta, G., Schreiner, C., Stares, S., Torgersen, H. and Wagner, W. (2006) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends. Brussels: European Commission.
12. Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R. (2001) Bounded Rationality: the Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Heller, R. (2003) GM Nation? The Findings of the Public Debate. London: Clarity.
14. Hill, R.A. (2005) " Conceptualizing Risk Assessment Methodology for Genetically Modified Organisms, " Environmental Biosafety Research 4: 67-70.
15. Jésus, F. (2001) PACT, A Pro-Active Conciliation Tool: Analysing Stakeholders'Inter-Relation. CGPRT Monographs no. 41. Bogor: CGPRT.
16. Jésus, F. and Bourgeois, R. (2002) " Incorporating Collective Decision in Public Management: Practical Coordination of Actors' Preferences, " in The Commons in an Age of Globalisation, pp. 17-21. 9th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Zimbabwe, June.
17. Joly, P.B. and Marris, C. (2003) " La participation contre la mobilisation? Une analyse comparée du débat sur les OGM en France et au Royaume-Uni, " Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée 10 (2). 195-206.
18. Joly, P.B., Marris, C. and Hermitte, M.A. (2003) " A la recherche d'une démocratie technique-Enseignements de la conférence citoyenne sur les OGM en France, " Natures Science Société 11: 3-15.
19. Kasperson, J.X. and Kasperson, R.E. (2005) The Social Contours of Risk. Volume 1: Publics, Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Risk. London: Earthscan Publications.
20. Le Déaut, J.Y. (1999) Choix technologiques, débat public et décision politique. L'opinion publique face aux plantes transgéniques. Paris: Albin Michel.
21. Le Déaut, J.Y. (2001) " Le débat nécessaire entre le politique et le citoyen, " Risques 47: 115-20.
22. Levidow, L. and Murphy, J. (2003) " Reframing Regulatory Science: Trans-Atlantic Conflicts over GM Crops, " Cahiers d'économie et sociologie rurales 68-9: 47-74.
23. Marris, C. (2001) Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe. Final Report of the PABE research project funded by the Commission of European Communities, contract number FAIR CT98-3844 (DG12-SSMI). Brussels: European Commission.
24. Pellizzoni, L. (2001) " Democracy and the Governance of Uncertainty: the Case of Agricultural Gene Technologies, " Journal of Hazardous Materials 86 (1-3). 205-22.
25. Pidgeon, N.F., Poortinga, W., Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. and O'Riordan, T. (2005) " Using Surveys in Public Participation Processes for Risk Decision-making: the Case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate, " Risk Analysis 25 (2). 467-79.
26. Post, D.L. and Da Ros, J.M. (2003) " Science and Public Participation in Regulating Genetically-engineered Food: French and American Experiences, " Cahiers d'économie et de sociologie rurales 68-9: 75-101.
27. Rayner, S. (2003) " Democracy in the Age of Assessment: Reflections on the Roles of Expertise and Democracy in Public-sector Decision Making, " Science and Public Policy 30 (3). 163-70.
28. Rouchier, J. and Thoyer, S. (2003) " Modelling an European Decision Making Process with Heterogeneous Public Opinion and Lobbying: the Case of the Authorization Procedure for Placing Genetically Modified Organisms on the Market, " in D. Hales et al. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation, pp. 149-66. Heidelberg: Springer.
29. Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. and Pidgeon, N. (2005) " Difficulties in Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives: Reflections on an Evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public Debate about Transgenic Crops, " Public Understanding of Science 14: 331-52.
30. Seifert, F. (2006) " Local Steps in an International Career: a Danish-style Consensus Conference in Austria, " Public Understanding of Science 15: 73-88.
31. Simon, H.A. (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Sterling, A. and Mayer, S. (2001) " A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk: a Multicriteria Mapping Study of a Genetically Modified Crop, " Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 529-55.
33. Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Allansdottir, A., Cheveigné, S., Dahinden, U., Diego, C., Montali, L., Mortensen, A., Pfenning, U., Rusanen, T. and Seger, N. (2001) " Nature in Disorder: the Troubled Public of Biotechnology, " in G. Gaskell and M. Bauer (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: the Years of Controversy, pp. 80-95. London: Science Museum.