Down to earth: Linking planning theory and practice in the 'metropole' and beyond

International Planning Studies

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 223-237

  Watson, Vanessa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; METROPOLITAN AREA; PLANNING PRACTICE; PLANNING THEORY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 57149103939     PISSN: 13563475     EISSN: 14699265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13563470802521408     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alexander, E. (1998) Doing the impossible: Notes for a general theory of planning. Environment and Behaviour B: Planning and Design, 25:5, pp. 667-680.
2. Bayat, A. (2004) Globalization and the politics of the informals in the global south. Urban Informality. Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD
3. Beauregard, R. (1999) Writing the planner. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18, pp. 93-101.
4. Booher, D. and Innes, J. (2002) Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, pp. 221-236.
5. Brown, W. (2003) Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory and Event, 7:1, pp. 1-19.
6. Connell, R. (2007) Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science, Allen and Unwin, Australia
7. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (2001) The case for participation as tyranny. Participation: The New Tyranny?, pp. 1-15. Zed Books, London
8. Cowherd, R. (2005) Does planning culture matter? Dutch and American models in Indonesian urban transformations. Comparative Planning Cultures, Routledge, New York and London
9. Davis, M. (2004) Planet of slums. New Left Review, pp. 1-23.
10. Fischler, R. (2000) Communicative planning theory: A Foucauldian assessment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:4, pp. 358-368.
11. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Empowering civil society: Habermas, Foucault and the question of conflict. Cities for Citizens, Wiley, Chichester
12. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004) Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Planning Theory and Practice, 5:3, pp. 283-306.
13. Forester, J. (1997) Learning from Practice: Democratic Deliberations and the Promise of Planning Practice, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
14. Forester, J. (1999) Reflections on the future understanding of planning practice. International Planning Studies, 4:2, pp. 175-193.
15. Friedmann, J. (2003) Why do planning theory?. Planning Theory, 2:1, pp. 7-10.
16. Gonzalez, S. and Healey, P. (2005) A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Studies, 42:11, pp. 2055-2069.
17. Harrison, P. (2006) On the edge of reason: Planning and urban futures in Africa. Urban Studies, 43:2, pp. 319-335.
18. Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Planning Theory, 63, pp. 143-162.
19. Healey, P. (1997) Situating communicative practices: Moving beyond urban political economy. Planning Theory, 17, pp. 65-82.
20. Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, MacMillan Press, Basingstoke
21. Healey, P. (1999) Institutional analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp. 111-121.
22. Healey, P. (2003) Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2:2, pp. 101-123.
23. Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. (2005) Relocating participation within a radical politics of development. Development and Change, 36:2, pp. 237-262.
24. Hoch, C. (1997) A reply. Planning Theory, 17, pp. 83-85.
25. Huxley, M. (2000) The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp. 369-377.
26. Innes, J. (1995) Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14:3, pp. 183-189.
27. Innes, J. (2004) Consensus building; clarification for the critics. Planning Theory, 3:1, pp. 5-20.
28. Jamal, T., Stein, S. and Harper, T. (2005) Pragmatic planning in multistakeholder tourism-environmental conflicts. Dialogues in Urban and Regional Planning, Routledge, London and New York
29. Kapoor, I. (2002) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? The relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe debate for third world politics. Alternatives, 27, pp. 459-487.
30. Krieger, M. (1974) Some new directions for planning theories. Journal of the American Planning Association, 40, pp. 156-163.
31. Lauria, M. and Wagner, J. (2006) Empirical studies of planning theory? A comparative case analysis of extant literature. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, pp. 364-381.
32. Lauria, M. and Whelan, R. (1995) Planning theory and political economy: The need for reintegration. Planning Theory, 14, pp. 8-33.
33. Leaf, M. (2005) Modernity confronts tradition: The professional planner and local corporatism in the rebuilding of China's cities. Comparative Planning Cultures, Routledge, New York and London
34. Liggett, H. (1996) Examining the planning practice conscious(ness). Explorations in Planning Theory, Rutgers, Centre for Urban Policy Research, New Burnswick, NJ
35. Mandelbaum, S., Mazza, L. and Burchell, R. (1996) Explorations in Planning Theory, Rutgers, Centre for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ
36. McGuirk, P. (2001) Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 195-217.
37. Porter, L. (2006) Planning in (post) colonial settings: Challenges for theory and practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 7:4, pp. 383-396.
38. Roy, A. (2005) Urban informality: Towards an epistemology of planning. JAPA, 71:2, pp. 147-158.
39. Roy, A. (2006) Praxis in the time of Empire. Planning Theory, 5:1, pp. 7-29.
40. Sakar, S. (1997) Writing Social History, Oxford University Press, New Delhi
41. Sandercock, L. (1998) Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities, John Wiley, Chichester
42. Sandercock, L. (2003) Cosmopolis 11: Mongrel Cities in the 21st Century, Continuum, London
43. Sanyal, B. (2005) Comparative Planning Cultures, Routledge, New York and London
44. Schon, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York
45. Slater, D. (2004) Geopolitics and the Post-colonial: Rethinking North-South Relations, Blackwell, Oxford
46. Sorensen, A. (2005) The developmental state and the extreme narrowness of the public realm: The twentieth century evolution of Japanese planning culture. Comparative Planning Cultures, Routledge, New York and London
47. Stein, S. and Harper, T. (1998) Pragmatic incrementalist planning in post-modern society: A normative justification. Planning Theory, 18, pp. 3-28.
48. Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger, P. (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 1975-1989.
49. Umemoto, K. (2001) Walking in another's shoes. Epistemological challenges in participatory planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, pp. 17-31.
50. Vigar, G., Healey, P., Hull, A. and Davoudi, S. (2000) Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain: An Institutionalist Analysis, Macmillan, Basingstoke
51. Watson, V. (2003) Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics. Planning Theory and Practice, 4:4, pp. 395-408.
52. Watson, V. (2006) Deep difference: Diversity, planning and ethics. Planning Theory, 5:1, pp. 31-50.
53. Yiftachel, O. (2006) Ethnocracy. Land and Identity Politics in Israel/ Palestine, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
54. Yiftachel, O. and Huxley, M. (2000) Debating dominance and relevance: Notes on the 'communicative turn' in planning theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24:4, pp. 907-913.