Indexed keywords
ALGORITHM;
BIBLIOMETRICS;
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT;
EDITORIAL;
MEDICAL LITERATURE;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
METHODOLOGY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PRODUCTIVITY;
PUBLICATION;
QUALITY CONTROL;
SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;
SCORING SYSTEM;
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH;
JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR;
PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH;
PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
SPECIALISM;
1
45949097418
Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information
Stringer MJ, Sales-Pardo M, Nunes Amaral LA. Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e1683.
(2008)
PLoS ONE
, vol.3
Stringer, M.J.1
Sales-Pardo, M.2
Nunes Amaral, L.A.3
2
44949104706
RAE, Accessed 17 September 2008
RAE 2008; Research Assessment Exercise. http://www.rae.ac.uk/ [Accessed 17 September 2008].
(2008)
Research Assessment Exercise
3
57149089705
Accessed 17 September 2008
Wikipedia. Official World Golf Rankings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Golf_rankings [Accessed 17 September 2008].
Official World Golf Rankings
4
29944438252
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor
Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 2006; 295: 90-93.
(2006)
JAMA
, vol.295
, pp. 90-93
Garfield, E.1
5
33645540427
The agony and the ecstasy; the history and meaning of the journal impact factor
Chicago, September 16
Garfield E. The agony and the ecstasy; the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. International Congress on Peer Review And Biomedical Publication, Chicago, September 16, 2005; 1-22.
(2005)
International Congress on Peer Review And Biomedical Publication
, pp. 1-22
Garfield, E.1
6
0031049280
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997; 314: 497.
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 497
Seglen, P.O.1
7
33745613796
The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature
PLoS Editors
PLoS Editors. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLos Med 2006; 3: e291.
(2006)
PLos Med
, vol.3
8
57149090770
Accessed 17 September 2008
ISI Journal Citation Reports. http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/JCR [Accessed 17 September 2008].
ISI Journal Citation Reports
9
85039993271
abstract and citation database, Accessed 17 September 2008
Elsevier BV. Scopus abstract and citation database. http://www.scopus. com/scopus/home.url [Accessed 17 September 2008].
Scopus
Elsevier, B.V.1
10
0026415586
Research papers: Who's uncited now?
Hamilton DP. Research papers: who's uncited now? Science 1991; 251: 25.
(1991)
Science
, vol.251
, pp. 25
Hamilton, D.P.1
11
28044445101
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 16569-16572.
(2005)
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
, vol.102
, pp. 16569-16572
Hirsch, J.E.1
12
33748666845
Theory and practice of the g-index
Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006; 69: 131-152.
(2006)
Scientometrics
, vol.69
, pp. 131-152
Egghe, L.1
14
57149118906
harzing.com. Publish or Perish. http://www.harzing.com/resources.htm#/ pop.htm [Accessed 17 September 2008].
harzing.com. Publish or Perish. http://www.harzing.com/resources.htm#/ pop.htm [Accessed 17 September 2008].
15
57149084299
Accessed 17 September 2008
Wikipedia. PageRank. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank [Accessed 17 September 2008].
PageRank
16
79961045531
Accessed 17 September 2008
Google Scholar. http://scholar.google.com/ [Accessed 17 September 2008].
Google Scholar
17
30344476667
Google scholar: The new generation of citation indexes
Noruzi A. Google scholar: the new generation of citation indexes. Libri 2005; 55: 170-180.
(2005)
Libri
, vol.55
, pp. 170-180
Noruzi, A.1