Fibrocystic change of the breast presenting as a focal lesion mimicking breast cancer in MR imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1499-1505

  Chen, Jeon Hor ^a,b   Nalcioglu, Orhan ^a   Su, Min Ying ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Fibrocystic change; Focal fibrocystic change; Mammography; MR imaging; Sonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 57149085105     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21455     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Wu C, Ray RM, Lin MG, et al. A case-control study of risk factors for fibrocystic breast conditions. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:945-960.
2. Love SM, Gelman RS, Silen W. Fibrocystic "disease" of the breast - a nondisease? N Engl J Med 1982;307:1010-1014.
3. DiPiro PJ, Gulizia JA, Lester SC, et al. Mammography and sonographic appearances of nodular adenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:31-34.
4. Harvey SC, Denison CM, Lester SC, et al. Fibrous nodules found at large-core needle biopsy of the breast: imaging features. Radiology 1999;211:535-540.
5. Warner JK, Kumar D, Berg WA. Apocrine metaplasia: mammography and sonographic appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1375-1379.
6. van den Bosch MA, Daniel BL, Mariano MN, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics fibrocystic change of the breast. Invest Radiol 2005;40:436-441.
7. BI-RADS - MRI, First Edition. American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
8. Su MY, Yu HJ, Carpenter PM, McLaren CE, Nalcioglu O. Pharmacokinetic parameters analyzed from MR contrast enhancement kinetics of multiple malignant and benign breast lesions detected in the same patients. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4:255-263.
9. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989;170(3 Pt 1):681-686.
10. Shetty MK, Shah YP. Sonographic findings in focal fibrocystic changes of the breast. Ultrasound Q 2002;18:35-40.
11. Iglesias A, Arias M, Santiago P, Rodríguez M, Mañas J, Saborido C. Benign breast lesions that simulate malignancy: magnetic resonance imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2007;36:66-82.
12. Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, et al. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:104-112.
13. Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:426-430.
14. Yabuuchi H, Kuroiwa T, Kusumoto C, Fukuya T, Ohno S, Hachitanda Y. Incidentally detected lesions on contrast-enhanced MR imaging in candidates for breast-conserving therapy: correlation between MR findings and histological diagnosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:486-492.
15. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1295-1303.
16. Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 1985;312:146-151.