Incidentally detected lesions on contrast-enhanced MR imaging in candidates for breast-conserving therapy: Correlation between MR findings histological diagnosis

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 486-492

  Yabuuchi, Hidetake ^a,c   Kuroiwa, Toshiro ^a   Kusumoto, Chie ^a   Fukuya, Tatsuro ^b   Ohno, Shinji ^a   Hachitanda, Yoichi ^a  

^a NATIONAL KYUSHU CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

^b National Hospital Organization   (Japan)

^c KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Breast neoplasms surgery; Breast MR; Diagnosis; MR contrast enhancement; MR treatment planning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVING THERAPY; BREAST LESION; BREAST SURGERY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCIDENTAL FINDING; KINETIC CURVE ASSESSMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 33645681667     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20532     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, et al. Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast: long-term results of three randomized trials on 1,973 patients. Eur J Cancer 1995;31:1574-1579.
2. Staradub VL, Hsieh YC, Clauson J, et al. Factors that influence surgical choices in women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002;95:1185-1190.
3. Dershaw DD. Breast imaging and the conservative treatment of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:501-516.
4. Morrow M, Schmidt R, Hassett C. Patient selection for breast conservation therapy with magnification mammography. Surgery 1995;118:621-626.
5. Winchester DP, Cox JD. Standards for diagnosis and management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:83-107.
6. Lagios MD, Westdahl PR, Rose MR. The concept and implications of multicentricity in breast carcinoma. Pathol Annu 1981;16:83-102.
7. Holland R, Veling SHJ, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985;56:979-990.
8. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999;213:881-888.
9. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13-30.
10. Brown J, Smith RC, Lee CH. Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1249-1254.
11. Teifke A, Lehr HA, Vornweg TW, et al. Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:655-662.
12. Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Bedi DG, et al. Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002;95:982-988.
13. Buchbinder SS, Gurell DS, Tarlow MM, et al. Role of US-guided fine-needle aspiration with on-site cytopathologic evaluation in management of nonpalpable breast lesions. Acad Radiol 2001;8:322-327.
14. Ogawa Y, Kato Y, Nakata B, et al. Diagnostic potential and pitfalls of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology for breast lesions. Surg Today 1998;28:167-172.
15. Park JM, Yoon GS, Kim SM, et al. Sonographic detection of multifocality in breast carcinoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2003;31:293-298.
16. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shchrynski S, et al. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:177-182.
17. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:171-178.
18. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK, et al. Breast Imaging Lexicon-MRI. In: ACR BI-RADS-Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1st edition. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003. p. 13-19.
19. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-110.
20. Siegmann KC, Muller-Schimpfle M, Schick F, et al. MR imaging-detected breast lesions: histopathologic correlation of lesion characteristics and signal intensity data. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1403-1409.
21. Lee CH, Smith RC, Levine JA, et al. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1323-1329.
22. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997;202:413-420.
23. Kuhl CK, Elevelt A, Leuiner CC, et al. Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of stereotactic localization and biopsy device. Radiology 1997;204:667-675.