On the discrepancies between designers’ and users’ perceptions as antecedents of failures in motivating use

MCCSIS 2007 - IADIS Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems - Proceedings of Intelligent Systems and Agents 2007, Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction 2007, Computer Graphics and Visualization 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 206-210

  Karapanos, Evangelos ^a   Martens, Jean Bernard ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Designer; Emotion; Repertory Grid; User perceptions

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION;

EMOTIONAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; REPERTORY GRID TECHNIQUE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 57049177236     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Clarke, K. R. (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 117-143.
2. Cockton, G. (2004) From quality in use to value in the world. CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. Vienna, Austria ACM Press.
3. Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B. & Paik, M. C. (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions Wiley-Interscience.
4. Fransella, F., Bell, R. & Bannister, D. (2003) A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique Wiley.
5. Furlan, R. & Corradetti, R. (2006) Reducing Conjoint Analysis Paired Comparisons Tasks by a Random Selection Procedure. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22, 603-612.
6. Green, P. E., Carmone Jr., F. J. & Smith, S. M. (1989) Multidimensional Scaling, Concepts and Applications, Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon.
7. Hassenzahl, M. (2004) The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 319-349.
8. Hassenzahl, M. & Wessler, R. (2000) Capturing design space from a user perspective: The Repertory Grid Technique revisited. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 441-459.
9. Keinonen, T. (1997) Expected usability and product preference. Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ACM Press.
10. Kelly, G. A. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs New York, Norton.
11. Kujala, S. & Kauppinen, M. (2004) Identifying and selecting users for user-centered design. Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction. Tampere, Finland, ACM Press.
12. Lavie, T. & Tractinsky, N. (2004) Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 269-298.
13. Mahlke, S. (2006) Aesthetic and Symbolic Qualities as Antecedents of Overall Judgements of Interactive Products. People and Computers XX - Engage, Proceedings of HCI '06. London, Springer.
14. Martens, J.-B. (2002) Multidimensional modeling of image quality. Proceedings of the Ieee Software, 90, 133-153. Martens, J.-B. (2003) Image technology design: A perceptual approach, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publisher.
15. Ouden, E. d., Yuan, L., Sonnemans, P. J. M. & Brombacher, A. C. (2006) Quality and Reliability Problems from a Consumer's Perspective: an Increasing Problem Overlooked by Businesses? Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22, 821-838.
16. Overbeeke, C. J., Djajadiningrat, J. P., Hummels, C. C. M. & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2002) Beauty in Usability: Forget about Ease of Use!, London, Taylor & Francis.
17. Sandt Van de, U. (1970) Incomplete paired comparisons using balanced lattice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, VII, 246-248.