Response: When does grasping escape Weber's law?

Current Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 23, 2008, Pages

  Ganel, Tzvi ^a   Chajut, Eran ^b   Tanzer, Michal ^a   Algom, Daniel ^c  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF ISRAEL   (Israel)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049168173     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.007     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. Ganel T., Chajut E., and Algom D. Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles. Curr. Biol. 18 (2008) R599-R601
2. Smeets B.J., and Brenner E. Grasping Weber's law. Curr. Biol. 18 (2008) R1089-R1090
3. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F., and Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr. Biol. 5 (1995) 679-685
4. Ganel T., Tanzer M., and Goodale M.A. A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions: Opposite effects of real and illusory size. Psychol. Sci. 19 (2008) 221-225
5. Ganel T., and Goodale M.A. Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature 426 (2003) 664-667
6. Goodale M.A., Westwood D.A., and Milner A.D. Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Prog. Brain. Res. 144 (2004) 131-144
7. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The Visual Brain in Action. 2nd edition (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. Independent movements of the digits in grasping. Exp. Brain. Res. 139 (2001) 92-100
9. Westwood D., and Goodale M.A. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spat. Vis. 16 (2003) 243-254
10. Marks L.E., and Algom D. Psychophysical scaling. In: Birnbaum M.H. (Ed). Measurement, Judgment and Decision Making (1998), Academic Press, San Diego 81-178