Effect of transient versus sustained activation on interocular suppression

Vision Research

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 102-114

  Nichols, David F ^a   Wilson, Hugh R ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Computational modeling; Flash suppression

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MONOCULAR VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 57049167000     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.033     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alais D., and Blake R. Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39 (1999) 4341-4353
2. Alais, D., O'Shea, R. P., Mesana-Alais, C., & Wilson, I. G. (2000). Translation of Diaz-Caneja (1928).
3. Blake R., and Camisa J. On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5 (1979) 315-323
4. Blake R., O'Shea R.P., and Mueller T.J. Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Visual Neuroscience 8 (1992) 469-478
5. Blake R., Tadin D., Sobel K.V., Raissian T.A., and Chong S.C. Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (2006) 4783-4788
6. Bonneh Y.S., Cooperman A., and Sagi D. Motion-induced blindness in normal observers. Nature 411 (2001) 798-801
7. Brascamp J.W., Knapen T.H.J., Kanai R., van Ee R., and van den Berg A.V. Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 7 (2007) 1-12
8. DeAnglelis G.C., Freeman R.D., and Ohzawa I. Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 71 (1994) 347-374
9. Diaz-Caneja E. Sur l'alternance binoculaire. Annales d'Oculistique 165 (1928) 721-731
10. Fox R., and Check R. Binocular fusion: A test of the suppression theory. Perception & Psychophysics 1 (1966) 331-334
11. Fox R., and Check R. Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1972) 283-289
12. Fukuda H., and Blake R. Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2 (1992) 362-370
13. Hollins M., and Bailey G.W. Rivalry target luminance does not affect suppression depth. Perception & Psychophysics 30 (1981) 201-203
14. Hubel D.H., and Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 28 (1965) 229-289
15. Kaufman L. On the spread of suppression and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 3 (1963) 401-405
16. Kovács I., Papathomas T.V., Yang M., and Fehér A. When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (1996) 15508-15511
17. Lehky S.R. An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception 17 (1988) 215-228
18. Levelt W.J.M. On binocular rivalry (1965), Institute of Perception, Soesterberg, The Netherlands
19. Liu L., and Schor C.M. The spatial properties of binocular suppression zone. Vision Research 34 (1994) 937-947
20. Maier A., Logothetis N.K., and Leopold D.A. Global competition dictates local suppression in pattern rivalry. Journal of Vision 5 (2005) 668-677
21. Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. In Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no. 07-095. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Noest A.J., van Ee R., Nijs M.M., and van Wezel R.J.A. Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model. Journal of Vision 7 (2007) 1-14
23. Norman H.F., Norman J.F., and Bilotta J. The temporal course of suppression during binocular rivalry. Perception 29 (2000) 831-841
24. Petrov Y., and McKee S.P. The effect of spatial configuration on surround suppression of contrast sensitivity. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 224-238
25. Polat U., and Sagi D. Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments. Vision Research 33 (1993) 993-999
26. Stollenwerk L., and Bode M. Lateral neural model of binocular rivalry. Neural Computation 15 (2003) 2863-2882
27. Tsuchiya N., and Koch C. Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1096-1101
28. Tsuchiya N., Koch C., Gilroy L.A., and Blake R. Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 1068-1078
29. von Helmholtz H. Treatise on physiological optics. In: Southall J.P.C. (Ed) (1962), Dover Publications, New York Vol. III
30. Wilke M., Logothetis N.K., and Leopold D.A. Generalized flash suppression of salient visual targets. Neuron 39 (2002) 1043-1062
31. Wilson H.R. Rivalry and perceptual oscillations: A dynamical synthesis. In: Alais D., and Blake R. (Eds). Binocular rivalry (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
32. Wilson H.R. Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory. Vision Research 47 (2007) 2741-2750
33. Wilson H.R., Blake R., and Lee S.H. Dynamics of traveling waves in visual perception. Nature 412 (2001) 907-910
34. Wolfe J.M. Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research 24 (1984) 471-478