Design for intuitive use: Beyond usability

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2375-2378

  Naumann, Anja B ^a   Pohlmeyer, Anna E ^a   Hußlein, Steffi ^b   Kindsmüller, Martin Christof ^c   Mohs, Carsten ^d   Israel, Johann Habakuk ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c Institute for Multimedia and Interactive Systems   (Germany)

^d HFC Human Factors Consult GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Intuitive use; Physicality; Usability

Indexed keywords

DIFFRACTIVE OPTICAL ELEMENTS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

AESTHETICS; INTUITIVE USE; PHYSICALITY; USABILITY;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 57049165498     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1358628.1358688     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Creusen, M., Schoormans, J. The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of product innovation management, 22 (2005), 63-81.
2. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 (1972), 285-290.
3. Djajadiningrat, J.P., Overbeeke, C.J., Wensveen, S.A.G. Augmenting fun and beauty: A pamphlet. Proc. DARE 2000, ACM Press (2000), 131-134.
4. Hassenzahl, M. The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (2004), 319-349.
5. Hekkert, P., Snelders, D., van Wieringen, P.C. 'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94 (2003), 111-124.
6. Hoven, E.v.d., Frens, J., Aliakseyeu, D., Martens, J.-B., Overbecke, K., Peters, P., Design Research & Tangible Interaction. Proc. TEI'07, ACM Press (2007), 109-115.
7. Hurtienne, J., Israel, J.H., Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. Proc. TEI'07, ACM Press (2007), 127-134.
8. Jordan, P. W. Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics 29, 1 (1998), 25-33.
9. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., Augustin, D.A. model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Psychology, 95 (2004), 489-508.
10. Mohs, C., Hurtienne, J., Scholz, D., Rötting, M. Intuitivität - definierbar, beeinflussbar, überprüfbar. In Useware 2006 - VDI Berichte Nr. 1946. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf (2006), 215-224.
11. Naumann, A., Hurtienne, J., Israel, J.H., Mohs, C., Kindsmüller, M.C., Meyer, H.A., Husslein, S. Intuitive Use of User Interfaces: Defining a Vague Concept. In D. Harris (Ed.). Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, HCII 2007, Vol. 13, Springer, Heidelberg (2007), 128-136.
12. Norman, D.A. The next UI breakthrough, part 2: physicality. Interactions 14, 4 (2007), 46-47.
13. Norman, D. A. Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, 2004.
14. Rasmussen, J. Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.
15. Streitz, N.A. Cognitive ergonomics: An approach for the design of user-oriented interactive systems. In Klix, F. and Wandke, H. (eds.) MACINTER I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, NL (1986), 21-33.
16. Tidwell, J. Designing Interfaces: Patterns for Effective Interaction Design. O'Reilly, Cambridge, 2006.
17. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S., Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13 (2000), 127-145.
18. Wertheimer, M. Drei Abhandlungen zur Gestalttheorie. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1967.