Problem frames and business strategy modelling

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 48-51

  Babar, Abdul ^a   Zowghi, Didar ^a   Cox, Karl ^b   Tosic, Vladimir ^b   Bleistein, Steven ^b   Verner, June ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Business IT alignment; Problem frames; Strategy modeling

Indexed keywords

COBALT; FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

APPROPRIATE TECHNIQUES; BUSINESS FUNCTIONS; BUSINESS STRATEGIES; BUSINESS-IT ALIGNMENT; COMPETITIVE BUSINESSES; IT IMPLEMENTATIONS; IT SYSTEMS; JACKSON; PROBLEM FRAMES; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES; STRATEGY MODELING;

PLANNING;

EID: 57049146776     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1370811.1370821     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Yu, E. 1993. Modelling Organizations for Information Systems Requirements Engineering, presented at IEEE Intl. Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 34-41.
2. st Ed. Addison-Wesley.
3. Noran, O. 2003. An Analysis of the Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture from the GERAM Perspective, Annual Reviews in Control 27, pp. 163-183.
4. Jong, G. & Telelogic, I. 2002. A UML-based Design Methodology for Real-time and Embedded Systems, Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, pp. 776-789.
5. Chapin, D., Estep, C. K., Hall, J. Healy, J. D. Healy, K. A. Kolber, A. B. Ross, R. G. and Schacher, M. 2005. The Business Motivation Model: Business Governance in a Volatile World, release 1.2, The Business Rules Group September.
6. Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J. and Pistore, M. 2004. The Tropos Methdology: an Overview, In Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems: the Agent-oriented Software Engineering Handbook, F. Bergenti, M.-P. Gleizes, and F. Zambonelli, Eds. Boston, MA; London: Kluwer Academic, pp. 89-106.
7. Dardenne, A., Lamsweerde, A. & Fickas, S. 1993. Goaldirected Requirements Acquisition, Journal of Science and Computer Programming, Vol. 20, No. 1-2, pp. 3-50.
8. Jackson, M. 2001. Problem Frames: Analyzing and Structuring Software Development Problem, 1 st ed: Addison-Wesley.
9. Bleistein, S., Cox, K., Verner, J., & Phalp, K. 2006. B-SCP: a Requirements Analysis Framework for Validating Strategic Alignment of Organisational IT Based on Strategy, Context and Process. Information and Software Technology, 48 (9), pp. 846-868.
10. Babar, A., Cox, K., Bleistein, S., and Verner, J. 2007. Identifying Domain Context for the Intentional Modelling Technique Map, 1 st International Workshop on Enterprise Information Systems Engineering - WEISE 2007, Regensburg, Germany, 3-7 September 2007 (workshop held in conjunction with DEXA, proceedings published by IEEE), PP. 835-839.
11. Nurcan, S., Etien, A., Kaabi, R., Zoukar, L. & Rolland, C. 2005. A Strategy Driven Business Modelling Approach, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 628-649.
12. th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Nagoya, Japan, 5-7 Dec, pp. 17-24.
13. rd ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Fortalesa, Brazil, (Accepted).
14. Hall, J. G. and Rapanotti, L. 2005. Problem Frames for Socio-Technical Systems in Requirements Engineering for Socio-Technical Systems, Andres Silva and José L. Maté (Eds), pp. 318-339, Idea Group Inc.