Applying the landscape model to comprehending discourse from TV news stories

Discourse Processes

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 519-544

  Lee, Mina ^a   Roskos Ewoldsen, Beverly ^a,b   Roskos Ewoldsen, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049143674     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530802359566     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Albrecht, J. E., & O'Brien E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061-1070.
2. Anderson, D. R., & Lorch, E. P. (1983). Looking at television: Action or reaction? In J. Bryant & D. Anderson (Eds.), Children ' understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 1-34). New York: Academic.
3. Baggett, P. (1989). Understanding visual and verbal messages. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 101-124), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Beagles-Roos, J., & Gat, I. (1983). Specific impact of radio and television on children's story comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 128-137.
5. Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental, models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247, 44-48.
6. Broccoli, A. R. (Producer), & Gilbert, L. (Director). (1979). Moonraker. [Videotape]. London, UK: Eon Productions Ltd./Les Artistes Associes. [Distributed by MBM/UA Home Video].
7. Cohen, J. (2002). Deconstructing Ally: Exploring viewers' interpretations of population television. Media Psychology, 4, 253-277.
8. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression: Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Collins, W. A. (1983). Cognitive processing in television viewing. In E. Wartella & D. C. Whitney (Vol. Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook (pp. 195-209). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Eco, U. (1992). Interpretation and overinterpretation/Umberto Eco with Richard Rorty, Jonathan Culler, Christine Brooke-Rose; edited by Stefan Collini. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Farah, M. J. (1989). Knowledge from text and pictures: A neuropsychological perspective. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 59-71). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). G Power: A Priori Post-Hoc, and Compromise Power Atialysis for MS-DOS (Version 2.0) [Computer program]. Bonn, FRG: Bonn University, Department of Psychology.
14. Garnham, A. (1997). Representing information in mental models. In C. Martin (Ed.), Cognitive models of memory (pp. 149-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Gunter, B. (1987). Poor reception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Gunter, B., Furnham, A., & Griffiths, S. (2000). Children's memory for news: A comparison of three presentation media. Media Psychology, 2, 93-118.
17. Gyselinck, V., & Tardieu, H. (1999). The role of illustrations in text comprehension: What, when, for whom, and why? In S. R. Goldman & H. van Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 195-218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Hayes, D. S., Kelly, S. B., & Mandel, M. (1986). Media differences in children's story synopses: Radio and television contrasted. Journal, of Educational Psychology, 78, 341-346.
19. Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. L. (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 59-69.
20. Hoffner, C., Cantor, J., & Thorson, E. (1988). Children's understanding of a televised narrative: Developmental, differences in processing video and audio content. Communication Research, 15, 227-245.
21. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
22. Lang, A., Bradley, S. D., Park, B., Shin, M., & Chung, Y. (2006). Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology, 8, 369-394.
23. Levie, W. H. (1987). Research on pictures: A guide to the literature. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration (Vol. 1, pp. 1-50). New York: Springer.
24. Livingstone, S. M. (1987). The implicit representation of characters in "Dallas": A multidimensional scaling approach. Human Communication Research, 13, 399-420.
25. Livingstone, S. M. (1989). Interpretive viewers and structured programs. Communication Research, 16, 25-57.
26. Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22, 199-224.
27. Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 533-545.
28. Meringoff, L. K. (1980). Influence of the medium on children's story apprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 240-249.
29. Moliter, S., Ballstaedt, S., & Mandl, H. (1989). Problems in knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 3-35). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165-187.
31. O'Brien, E. J., & Albrecht J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, 18, 777-784.
32. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Oxford, England: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
33. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Paivio, A. (1991). Images in mind: The evolution of a theory. Hertfordshire, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
35. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
36. Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 940-953.
37. Robinson, J. P., & Davis, D. K. (1986). Comprehension of a single evening's news. In J. P. Robinson & M. R. Levy (Eds.), The main source: Learning from television news (pp. 107-132). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1986). Comprehension of a week's news. In J. P. Robinson & M. R. Levy (Eds.), The main source: Learning from, television news (pp. 87-105). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Carpentier, F. (2002). Media priming: A synthesis. In J. B. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.) Media effects in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 97-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Yang, M., & Lee, M. (2007). Comprehension of the Media. In D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen and J. L. Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition: Theory and methods (pp. 319-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Schmitt, K. L., Anderson, D. R., & Collins, P. A. (1999). Form and content: Looking at visual features of television. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1156-1167.
43. Singer, J. (1980). The power and limitations of television: A cognitive-affective analysis. In P. Tannenbaum (Ed.), The entertainment functions of television (pp. 31-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74 (Issue X, Whole No. 498).
45. van den Broek, P., & Gustafson, M. (1990). Comprehension and memory for texts: Three generations of reading research. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence (pp. 15-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
46. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A "landscape" view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. Britten & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165-188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
47. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. R. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence reading (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The Landscape Model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
49. Yang, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. (2004). Implications of the Landscape Model of text memory for brand placement. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 79-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933.
51. Zwaan, R. A., Langsten, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
52. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.
53. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 199-220.