Pairwise comparisons, incomparability and partial orders

ICEIS 2007 - 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Proceedings

Volumn AIDSS, Issue , 2007, Pages 297-302

  Janicki, Ryszard ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decision theory; Pairwise comparisons; Ranking; Weak and partial orders

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT MODELS; NEW APPROACHES; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; PAIRWISE COMPARISONS; PARTIAL ORDER; RANKING; WEAK AND PARTIAL ORDERS;

DECISION THEORY; GAME THEORY;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 57049135095     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Arrow K. J., 1951, Social Choice and Individual Values,J. Wiley, New York.
2. Dyer J. S., 1990, Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Pro-cess, Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 244-258.
3. Fechner G. T., I860, Elemente der Psychophysik, Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig.
4. Fishburn, P. C, 1985, Interval Orders and Interval Graphs, J. Wiley, New York.
5. French S., 1986, Decision Theory, Ellis Horwood, New York.
6. Janicki R., Koczkodaj W. W, 1996, Weak Order Approach to Group Ranking, Computers Math. Applic., Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 51-59.
7. Janicki R., Koutny M, 1993, Structure of Concurrency, Theor. Computer Science 112, pp. 5-52.
8. Koczkodaj W. W, 1993, A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 18, pp. 79-84.
9. Saaty T. L., 1977, A Scaling Methods for Priorities in Hier-archical Structure, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, pp. 234-281.
10. Saaty T. L., 1986, Axiomatic Foundations of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 841-855.
11. Thurstone L. L., 1927, A Law of Comparative Judgments, Psychological Reviews, 34, pp. 273-286.