A weak order approach to group ranking

Computers and Mathematics with Applications

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 51-59

  Janicki, R ^a   Koczkodaj, W W ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Arrow's axioms; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Group ranking; Partial and weak orders; Social function

Indexed keywords

BINARY SEQUENCES; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); EXPERT SYSTEMS; FUNCTIONS; THEOREM PROVING;

ARROW AXIOMS; ARROW IMPOSSIBILITY THEOREM; GROUP RANKING; PARTIAL AND WEAK ORDERS; SOCIAL FUNCTION;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 0030196513     PISSN: 08981221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0898-1221(96)00102-2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. K.J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, John Wiley, (1951).
2. S. French, Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality, Ellis Horwood Ltd, (1986).
3. rd International Workshop on Rough Sets and Soft Computing, San Jose, CA, pp. 190-198, (1994).
4. W.W. Koczkodaj, A new definition of consistency of pairwise components, Mathl. Comput. Modelling 18 (7), 79-84, (1993).
5. Z. Duszak and W.W. Koczkodaj, The generalization of a new definition of consistency for pairwise comparisons. Information Processing Letters 52 (2), 273-276, (1994).
6. R. Janicki and M. Koutny, Structure of concurrency, Theoretical Computer Science 12, 5-52 (1993).
7. P.C. Fishburn, Interval Orders and Interval Graphs, John Wiley, (1985).
8. E. Schröder, Algebra der Logik, Teuber, Leipzig, (1895).
9. P. Cartier and D. Foata, Problèmes combinatoires de commutation et réarrangements, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, (1969).
10. B.L. Whorf, Language, Thoughts and Reality (selected papers) (Edited by J.B. Carrol), Cambridge University Press, (1962).
11. S.W. Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Bantam Books, (1998).
12. H. Voogd, Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning, Pion Ltd, London, (1983).
13. L.L. Thurstone, A law of comparative judgments, Psychological Reviews 34, 273-286 (1927).
14. T.L. Saaty, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 234-281 (1977).