Furthering information systems action research: A post-positivist synthesis of four dialectics

Journal of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 48-72

  DeLuca, Dorrie ^a   Gallivan, Michael J ^b   Kock, Ned ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action research; Dialectic; Epistemology; Falsifiability; Front end loaded Grounded Theory Method (FGTM); Mixed methods; Multiple methods; Research paradigm; Synthesis; Triangulation framework

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION USE; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); TRIANGULATION;

ACTION RESEARCH; DIALECTIC; EPISTEMOLOGY; FALSIFIABILITY; GROUNDED THEORY METHODS; MIXED METHOD; MULTIPLE METHODS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 57049133502     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15369323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00150     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Alderfer, C.P. (1993). "Editor's Introduction: On The Changing Nature of Action Research," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, (29)4, pp. 389-392.
2. Allan, G. (2007). "The Use of the Grounded Theory Methodology in Investigating Practitioners' Integration of COTS Components in Information Systems," Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, Canada, A156, pp. 1-10.
3. Avison, D., R. Baskerville, and M. Myers (2001). "Controlling Action Research Projects," Information Technology and People. (14)1, pp. 28-45.
4. Avison, D., R. Baskerville, M. Myers, and T. Wood-Harper (1999a). "Panel: IS Action Research: Can We Serve Two masters?," Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, Charlotte, NC, pp. 582-585.
5. Avison, D., F. Lau, M. D. Myers, and P. Nielson (1999b). "Action Research," Communications of the ACM (42)1, pp. 94-97.
6. Axelsson, K. and G. Goldkuhl (2004). "Theory Modeling - Action Focus when Building a Multi-Grounded Theory," Third European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management (ECRM2004), Reading, UK.
7. Baroudi, J. J. and W. J. Orlikowski (1989). "The Problem of Statistical Power in MIS Research," MIS Quarterly (13)1, pp. 87-106.
8. Baskerville, R. and M. D. Myers (2004). "Making IS Research Relevant to Practice - Foreword," MISQ Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems (28)3, pp. 329-335.
9. Baskerville, R. and A. T. Wood-Harper (1998). "Diversity in Information Systems Action Research Methods," European Journal of Information Systems (7), pp. 90-107.
10. Baskerville, R. and A. T. Wood-Harper (1996). "A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research," Journal of Information Technology (11), pp. 235-246.
11. Baskerville, R. and J. Pries-Heje (1999). "Grounded Action Research: A Method for Understanding IT in Practice," Accounting Management & Information Technology (9), pp. 1-23.
12. Benbasat, I. and R. W. Zmud (1999) "Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance," MIS Quarterly (23)1, pp. 3-17.
13. Bharadwaj, A. (2000). "Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Information Systems Research: A Lakatosian Model," Foundations of Information Systems.
14. Braa, J., E. Monteiro, and S. Sahay (2004). "Networks of Action: Sustainable Health Information Systems across Developing Countries," MIS Quarterly (28)3, pp. 337-362.
15. Briggs, R. O. and D. L. Dean, D.L. (2005). "Tutorial: Successful Science from the Logical Positivist Perspective," 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HI, HI.
16. Brockwell, P. J. and R. A. Davis (1993). Time Series: Theory and Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. Chan, W.T. (1967). The Chinese mind: Essentials of Chinese Philosophy and Culture, Moore, C.A. (Ed.) East-West Center Press, Honolulu, HI.
18. Chan, Y.E. (2000). "IT Value: The Great Divide between Qualitative and Quantitative and Individual and Organizational Measures," Journal of Management Information Systems, (16)4, pp. 225-261.
19. Chiasson, M. and A. S. Dexter (2001) "System Development Conflict during the Use of an Information Systems Prototyping Method of Action Research: Implications for Practice and Research," Information Technology and People (14)1, pp. 91-108.
20. Cook, T. D. and D. T. Campbell (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally
21. Davenport, T. H. and M. L. Markus (1999). "Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud," MIS Quarterly. (23)1, pp. 19-23.
22. Davis, J.A. (1985). The Logic of Causal Order, Sage, London.
23. Davison, R. M., M. G. Martinsons, and N. Kock (2004). "Principles of Canonical Action Research," Information Systems Journal (14), pp. 65-86.
24. Davison, R. (2001) "GSS and Action Research in the Hong Kong Police," Information Technology and People (14)1, pp. 60-77.
25. DeLuca, D. C. (2003). Business Process Improvement Using Asynchronous e-Collaboration: Testing the Compensatory Adaptation Model. Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI Dissertation Services.
26. DeLuca, D. C. and N. Kock (2007). "Publishing Information Systems Action Research for a Positivist Audience," Communications of the Association of Information Systems, forthcoming.
27. DeLuca, D. C. and J. S. Valacich (2006). "Virtual Teams In and Out of Synchronicity," Information, Technology & People (19)4, pp. 323-344.
28. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Dué, L. and G. Paré (2003). "Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices, Trends, and Recommendations," MIS Quarterly (27)4, pp. 597-635.
30. Eden, C. and C. Huxham (1996). "Action Research for the Study of Organizations," in Clegg, S. Hardy, C. and Nord, W. (Eds.) Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage Publications, pp. 526-542.
31. Gable, G. (1994). "Integrating Case Study and Survey Research Methods: An Example in Information Systems", European Journal of Information Systems (3)2, pp. 112-126.
32. Gallivan, M. J. (1997). "Value in Triangulation: A Comparison of Two Approaches for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods," Information Systems and Qualitative Research. Lee, A. S., J. Liebenau, and J. I. DeGross. (Eds.), London: Chapman and Hall pp. 417-443.
33. Gallivan, M. J. and R. Benbunan-Fich (2007). "Analyzing IS Research Productivity: An Inclusive Approach to Global IS Scholarship," European Journal of Information Systems (16)1, pp. 36-53.
34. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergency versus Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
35. Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
36. Goldkuhl, G. and S. Cronholm (2003) "Multi-Grounded Theory - Adding Theoretical Grounding to Grounded Theory," Proceedings of 2nd European Conference of Research Methods in Business and Management (ECRM2003), Reading, UK.
37. Hirschheim, R. and W. Chen (2004). "A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of IS Research from 1991 to 2001," Information Systems Journal, (14)3, pp. 197-235.
38. Hirschheim, R. and H.K. Klein (2003). "Crisis in the IS field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline," JAIS, (4)5, pp. 237-293.
39. Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical Methods for Psychology (5th Ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
40. Hult, M. and S. A. Lennung (1980). "Towards a Definition of Action Research: A Note and Bibliography," Journal of Management Studies (17), pp. 241-250.
41. IT&P (2001). Special Issue on Information Systems Action Research, (Eds. Kock, N. and F. Lau), Information Technology and People (14)1.
42. Ishikawa, K. (1968). Guide to Quality Control. JUSE Press Limited, Tokyo, Japan, translated 1982 by Asian Productivity Association.
43. Iversen, J. H., L. Mathiassen, and P. A. Nielsen (2004). "Managing Risk in Software Process Improvement: An Action Research Approach," MIS Quarterly (28)3, pp. 395-433.
44. Jick, T. D. (1979). "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action," Administrative Science Quarterly (24)4, pp. 602-611.
45. Kaplan, B. and D. Duchon (1988), "Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study," MIS Quarterly (12)4, pp. 571-587.
46. Kidder, L. H. and M. Fine (1987) "Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: When Stories Converge," in New Directions for Program Evaluation, N.35, Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation. (Mark, M.M. and Shotland, R.L. Eds.) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,
47. Klein, H. K and M. D. Myers. (1999). "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly. (23)1, pp. 67-93.
48. Kluger, A. N. and J. Tikochinsky (2001). "The Error of Accepting the Theoretical Null Hypothesis: The Rise, Fall, and Resurrection of Commonsense Hypotheses in Psychology," Psychological Bulletin (127)3, pp. 408-423.
49. Kock, N. and F. Lau (2001). "Information Systems Action Research: Serving Two Demanding Masters," Information Technology and People (14)1, pp. 6-12.
50. Kohli, R. and W. J. Kettinger (2004). "Informating the Clan: Controlling Physicians' Cost and Outcomes," MIS Quarterly. (28)3, pp. 363-394.
51. Langley, A. (1999). "Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data," Academy of Management Review (24)4, pp. 691-710.
52. Lao Tzu (c. 5th century B.C.). Tao Te Ching, translated by Wing, R.L. (1986). New York, NY: Doubleday.
53. Lau, F. (1997). "A Review of Action Research in Information Systems Studies," Information Systems and Qualitative Research. Lee, A. S., J. Liebenau, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.). London: Chapman and Hall pp. 31-68.
54. Lee, A. S. (2005). "Notes on Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens in Positivist, Interpretive, and Action Research" from the Tutorial on "Educing Theory from Practice: Developing Significant Theory from Action Research" Baskerville, R., A. S. Lee, M. Chiasson, L. Mathiassen, America's Conference on Information Systems 2005. Omaha, NE.
55. Lee, A. S. (1991). "Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research," Organization Science (2)4, pp. 342-365.
56. Lee, A. S. and J. Liebenau (1997) "Information Systems and Qualitative Research," Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Lee, A.S., J. Liebenau, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 1-8.
57. Lee, A. S. and R. L. Baskerville (2003). "Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research (14)3, pp. 221-243.
58. Lewin, K. (1946). "Action Research and Minority Problems," Journal of Social Issues (2), p. 34-46.
59. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper and Row.
60. Lincoln, Y. S. and E.G. Guba (2000). "Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences," in Denzin, N. K and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
61. Lindgren, R., O. Henfridsson, and U. Schultze (2004). "Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study," MIS Quarterly (28)3, pp. 435-472.
62. Mark, M.M. and R. L. Shotland (1987). "Alternative models for the use of multiple methods," in New Directions for Program Evaluation, N.35, Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation (Mark, M.M. and R. L. Shotland, Eds.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
63. Markus, M. L. and A. S. Lee (1999). "Special Issue on Intensive Research in Information Systems: Using Qualitative, Interpretive, and Case Methods to Study Information Technology; Forward," MIS Quarterly (23)1, pp. 1-2.
64. Marshak, R.J. (1993). "Lewin Meets Confucius: A Re-View of the OD Model of Change," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science (29)4, pp. 393-415.
65. Martensson, P. and A. S. Lee (2004). "Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation," MIS Quarterly (28)3, pp. 507-536.
66. Mason, R.O. (1988). "Experimentation and Knowledge - A Pragmatic Perspective," Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization (10)1, pp. 3-24, London: Sage.
67. Maxwell, J.A. (1996) Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, London: Sage.
68. McKay, J. and P. Marshall (2001) "The Dual Imperatives of Action Research," Information Technology and People (14)1, pp. 46-59.
69. Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, London: Sage.
70. Mingers, J. (2003). "The Paucity of Multi-Method Research: A Review of the Information Systems Literature," Information Systems Journal (13), pp. 233-249.
71. Mingers, J. (2001). "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research (12)3, pp. 240-259.
72. MISQ (2004). MIS Quarterly Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems, Baskerville, R. L. and M. Myers (Eds.) MIS Quarterly (28)3.
73. Mumford, E. (2001) "Advice for an Action Researcher," Information Technology and People (14)1, pp. 12-27.
74. Myers, M. D. (1997). "Qualitative Research in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly. V.21, No.2, pp. 241-242. MISQ Discovery, archival version, June 1997, http://www.misq.org/misqd961/ isworld/, updated version, http://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz.
75. Nambisan, S., R. Agarwal, and M. Tanniru (1999), "Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information Technology," MIS Quarterly (23)3, pp. 365-395.
76. NSF. (2004). "NSF Report from the Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research," http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/ 2004/nsf04219/nsf04219.pdf.
77. Orlikowski, W. J., and J. J. Baroudi (1991), "Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions," Information Systems Research (2)2, pp. 1-28.
78. Paper, D. (2001). "Future IS Research: The Criticality of Relevance," JITCA (3)3.
79. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
80. Penguin Dictionary of Sociology, 2nd edition (1988). New York, NY: Penguin Press.
81. Popper, K. R. (1992). Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York, NY: Routledge.
82. QualIT (2007), http://www.qualitconference.com.
83. Robey, D. and M. C. Boudreau (1999). "Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications," Information Systems Research (10)2, pp. 167-186.
84. Robey, D., J. W. Ross, and M. C. Boudreau (2002). "Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change," Journal of Management Information Systems (19)1, pp. 17-42.
85. Robey, D. and M. L. Markus (1998). "Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems," Information Resources Management Journal (11)1, pp. 7-15.
86. Rosenthal, R. and R. L. Rosnow (1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
87. Sabherwal, R. and D. Robey (1995). "Reconciling Variance and Process Strategies for Studying Information System Development," Information Systems Research (6)4, pp. 303-327.
88. Shaw, T. and S. Jarvenpaa (1997). "Process Models in Information Systems," Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., and DeGross, J.I. (Eds.), London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 71-100.
89. Shotland, R. L. and M. M. Mark (1987). "Improving Inferences from Multiple Methods," in New Directions for Program Evaluation, N.35, Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation (Mark, M. M. and R. L. Shotland, Eds.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
90. Straub, D. W. and R. J. Welke (1998). "Coping with Systems Risk: Security Planning Models for Management Decision Making," MIS Quarterly (22)4, pp. 441-469.
91. Straub, D. W., D. Gefen, and J. M. Boudreau (2004), "Quantitative Positivist Research Methods in Information Systems," http://dstraub.cis.gsu.edu:88/quant/.
92. Strauss, A. L. and J. M. Corbin (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
93. Street, C. T. and D. Meister (2004). "Small Business Growth and Internal Transparency: The Role of Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, (28)3, pp. 473-506.
94. Suddaby, R. (2006). "From the Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not," Academy of Management Journal (49)4, pp.633-642.
95. Susman, G. I. and R. D. Evered (1978). "An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research," Administrative Science Quarterly (23)4, December, pp. 582-603.
96. Tranfield, D. and K. Starkey (1998). "The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy," British Journal of Management (9)4, pp. 341-353.
97. Trauth, E. M. and L. M. Jessup (2000). "Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use," MIS Quarterly (24)1, pp. 43-79.
98. Urquhart, C. and W. Fernández (2006). "Grounded Theory Method: The Researcher as Blank Slate and Other Myths," Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, pp. 1-8.
99. Vessey, I., V. Ramesh, and R. L. Glass (2002). "Research in IS: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and its Journals," Journal of Management Information Systems (19)2, pp. 129-174.
100. Walsham, G. (1995). "Interpretive Case Studies in Information Systems Research: Nature and Method," European Journal of Information Systems. pp. 74-81.
101. Weber, R. (2004). "Editor's Comments - The Rhetoric of Positivism Versus Interpretivism: A Personal View," MIS Quarterly (28)1, pp. iii-xii.
102. Webster, R. (1999). Feng Shui for Beginners: Successful Living by Design. St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn Publications.
103. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
104. Yoong, P. and B. Gallupe (2001) "Action Learning and Groupware Technologies: a Case Study in GSS facilitation research," Information Technology and People (14)1, pp. 78-90.