World knowledge in computational models of discourse comprehension

Discourse Processes

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 429-463

  Frank, Stefan L ^a,d   Koppen, Mathieu ^a   Noordman, Leo G M ^a   Vonk, Wietske ^b,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049104564     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530802069926     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1991). Effects of centrality on retrieval of text-based concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 932-939.
2. Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1459-1468.
3. Burgess, C., Livesay, K., & Lund, K. (1998). Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes, 25, 211-257.
4. Caillies, S., & Denhière, G. (2001). The interaction between textual structures and prior knowledge: Hypotheses, data and simulations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 17-31.
5. Caillies, S., Denhière, G., & Kintsch, W. (2002). The effect of prior knowledge on understanding from text: Evidence from primed recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 267-286.
6. Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S. (2005). What have we been missing? The role of general world knowledge in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 265-278.
7. Doane, S. M., & Sohn, Y. W. (2000). ADAPT: A predictive cognitive model of user visual attention and action planning. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 10, 1-45.
8. Doane, S. M., Sohn, Y. W., McNamara, D. S., & Adams, D. (2000). Comprehension-based skill acquisition. Cognitive Science, 24, 1-52.
9. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.
10. Frank, S. L., & Haselager, W. F. G. (2006). Robust semantic systematicity and distributed representations in a connectionist model of sentence comprehension. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 226-231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Frank, S. L., Koppen, M., Noordinan, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (2003). Modeling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehension. Cognitive Science, 27, 875-910.
12. Frank, S. L., Koppen, M., Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (2005). Predicting without modeling: A critique of Trabasso and Bartolone. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 374-377.
13. Frank, S. L., Koppen, M., Noordinan, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (2007). Coherence-driven resolution of referential ambiguity: A computational model. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1307-1322.
14. Golden, R. M., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1993). A. parallel distributed processing model of story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 16, 203-237.
15. Golding, J. M., Millis, K. M., Hauselt, J., & Sego, S. A. (1995). The effect of connectives and causal relatedness on text comprehension. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 126-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A. construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
17. Kintsch, W. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes, Volume 2 (pp. 261-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates, Inc.
18. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kintsch, W. (2000a). The control of knowledge activation in discourse comprehension. In W. J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer (pp. 137-146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Kintsch, W. (2000b). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 257-266.
21. Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173-202.
22. Kintsch, W., & Bowles, A. R. (2002). Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 249-262.
23. Kintsch, W., Patel, V. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (1999). The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologies 42, 186-198.
24. Kintsch, W., & Welsch, D. M. (199.1). The construction-integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 367-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Kintsch, W., Welsch, D. M., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133-159.
26. Kitajima, M., & Polson, P. G. (1995). A comprehension-based model of correct performance and errors in skilled, display-based, human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 65-99.
27. Kohonen, T. (1995). Self-organizing maps. Berlin: Springer.
28. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
29. Langsten, M. C., & Trabasso, T. (1999). Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 29-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
30. Linderholm, T., Virtue, S., Tzeng, Y., & Van den Broek, P. (2004). Fluctuations in the availability of information during reading: Capturing cognitive processes using the Landscape model. Discourse Processes, 37, 165-186.
31. Luna, D. (2005). Integrating ad information: A text-processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 38-51.
32. Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1991). Routine computing tasks: Planning as understanding. Cognitive Science, 15, 305-342.
33. Miikkulainen, R., & Dyer, M. G. (1991). Natural language processing with modular pdp networks and distributed lexicon. Cognitive Science, 15, 343-399.
34. Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131-157.
35. Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453-465.
36. O'Brien, E. J. (1987). Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 278-290.
37. O'Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., Hakala, C. M., & Rizzella, M. L. (1995). Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 626-634.
38. Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3, 229-235.
39. Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Curiel, J. M., & Copeland, D. E. (2001). Situation models and aging. Psychology ana' Aging, 16, 145-160.
40. Sanjosé, V., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Padilla, O. (2006). A connectionist extension to Kintsch's Construction-Integration model. Discourse Processes, 42, 1-35.
41. Schmalhofer, F., McDaniel, M. A., & Keefe, D. (2002). A unified model for predictive and bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 33, 105-132.
42. Singer, M. (1996). Comprehending consistent and inconsistent causal text sequences: A construction-integration analysis. Discourse Processes, 21, 1-21.
43. Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 1-38.
44. St. John, M. F. (1992). The story gestalt: A model of knowledge-intensive processes in text comprehension. Cognitive Science, 16, 271-306.
45. Tapiero, I., & Denhière, G. (1995). Simulating recall and recognition by using Kintsch's Construction-Integration model. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 211-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
46. Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory áCognition, 16, 283-298.
47. Van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48. Weeber, M. (1996). On modeling text processing. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
49. Yang, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Mental models for brand placement. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 79-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.