Moderators of the association between relational aggression and perceived popularity

Aggressive Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 563-576

  Puckett, Marissa B ^a   Aikins, Julie Wargo ^a   Cillessen, Antonius H N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Peer relations; Popularity; Quantitative methods; Rejection; Relational aggression; Social competence; Sociometric methods

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COOPERATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LEADERSHIP; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PEER GROUP; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REFERENCE VALUE; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIOMETRIC STATUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; AGGRESSION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PEER GROUP; REFERENCE VALUES; SELF EFFICACY; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOCIOMETRIC TECHNIQUES;

EID: 56849110881     PISSN: 0096140X     EISSN: 10982337     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ab.20280     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aiken LS, West SG. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Arbuckle JL. 2006. Amos 7.0 User's Guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
3. Archer J. 2001. A strategic approach to relational aggression. Soc Dev 10:267-271.
4. Bandura A. 1993. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ Psychol 28:117-148.
5. Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV, Pastorelli C. 1996. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Dev 67:1206-1222.
6. Bierman KL. 2004. Peer Rejection: Developmental. Processes and Intervention Strategies. New York: Guilford.
7. Björkqvist K, Lagerspetz K, Kaukiainen A. 1992. Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends regarding direct and indirect aggression. Aggr Behav 18: 117-127.
8. Bosacki SL. 2003. Psychological pragmatics in preadolescents: Sociomoral understanding, self-worth, and school behavior. J Youth Adolesc 32:141-155.
9. Cairns RB, Cairns BD. 1994. Lifelines and Risks: Pathways of Youth in Our Time. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Cillessen AHN, Mayeux L. 2004. From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child. Dev 75:147-163.
11. Cillessen AHN, Rose AJ. 2005. Understanding popularity in the peer system. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14:102-105.
12. Connolly J. 1989. Social self-efficacy in adolescence: Relations with self-concept, social adjustment, and mental health. Can J Behav Sci 21:258-269.
13. Crick NR, Grotpeter J. 1995. Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Dev 67:2317-2327.
14. Gorman AH, Kim J, Schimmelbusch A. 2002. The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference. J Sch Psychol 40:143-165.
15. Greitemeyer T, Rudolph U. 2003. Help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Why and when we help or retaliate. J Appl Soc Psychol 33:1069-1087.
16. Holmbeck GN. 2002. Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. J Pediatr Psychol 27:87-96.
17. Kaukiainen A, Björkqvist K, Lagerspetz K, Österman K, Salmivalli C, Rothberg S, Ahlbom A. 1999. The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression. Aggr Behav 25:81-89.
18. LaFontana KM, Cillessen AHN. 2002. Children's stereotypes of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Dev Psychol 38:635-647.
19. Newcomb AF, Bukowski WM, Pattee L. 1993. Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychol Bull 113:99-128.
20. Parkhurst JT, Hopmeyer AG. 1998. Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. J Early Adolesc 18:125-144.
21. Prinstein MJ, Cillessen AHN. 2003. Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Q 49:310-342.
22. Rabiner D, Coie JD. 1989. Effect of expectancy inductions on rejected children's acceptance by unfamiliar peers. Dev Psychol 25:450-457.
23. Rose AJ, Swenson LP, Waller EM. 2004. Physical and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Dev Psychol 40:378-387.
24. Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Parker JG. 1998. Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In: Damon W (series ed.), Eisen berg N (vol. ed.). Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, 5th edition. New York: Wiley, pp 619-700.
25. Salmivalli C, Kaukiainen A, Lagerspetz K. 2000. Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter? Scand J Psychol 41:17-24.
26. Sutton J, Smith PK, Swettenham J. 1999a. Bullying and 'theory of mind': A critique of the 'social skills deficit' view of anti-social behaviour. Soc Dev 8:117-127.
27. Sutton J, Smith PK, Swettenham J. 1999b. Socially undesirable need not be incompetent: A response to Crick and Dodge. Soc Dev 8:132-134.
28. Sutton J, Smith PK, Swettenham J. 1999c. Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? Br J Dev Psychol 17:435-450.
29. Twenge JM, Baumeister RF, DeWall CN, Ciarocco NJ, Bartels JM. 2007. Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 92:56-66.
30. Wheeler VA, Ladd GW. 1982. Assessment of children's self-efficacy for social interactions with peers. Dev Psychol 18:795-805.
31. Xie H, Cairns RB, Cairns BD. 2002a. The development of social aggression and physical aggression: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts. Aggr Behav 28:341-355.
32. Xie H, Swift DJ, Cairns BD, Cairns RB. 2002b. Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence. Soc Dev 11:205-224.