Making connections: Egg donation, the Internet, and the new reproductive technology marketplace

Advances in Medical Sociology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2008, Pages 53-73

  Holster, Kristin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56849097630     PISSN: 10576290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1057-6290(08)10004-3     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Abma J., and Martinez G. Childlessness among older women in the United States: Trends and profiles. Journal of Marriage and Family 68 4 (2006) 1045-1056
2. Almeling R. Selling genes, selling gender. American Sociological Review 72 3 (2007) 319-340
3. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technologies: A guide for patients (2003), American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Alabama
4. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2006). Highlights from the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Policy. Part II: Egg Donation: Cost of Implementing FDA Regulations; Influence of Donor Compensation in Recruitment; Donor Agencies' Compliance with ASRM Guidelines, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, New Orleans. Available at http://www.asrm.org/Media/Press/policyeggdonation.html. Retrieved on August 12, 2007.
5. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Financial compensation of oocyte donors. Fertility and Sterility 88 2 (2007) 305-309
6. Barker K. Electronic support groups, patient-consumers, and medicalization: The case of contested illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 49 1 (2008) 20-36
7. Bourgeault I.L., Declercq E., Sandall J., Wrede S., Vanstone M., Van Teijlingen E., DeVries R., and Benoit C. Too Posh To Push? Comparative perspectives on maternal request caesarean sections in Canada, the US, the UK and Finland. In: Chambré S.M., and Goldner M. (Eds). Advances in medical sociology: Patients, consumers and civil society (2009), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK 99-123
8. Burrows R., Nettleton S., Pleace N., Loader B., and Muncer S. Virtual community care? Social policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support. Information, Communication and Society 3 1 (2000) 95-121
9. Centers for Disease Control. Assisted reproductive technology success rates: National summary and fertility clinic reports (2006), Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta
10. Conrad P. The shifting engines of medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 46 1 (2005) 3-14
11. Conrad P., and Leiter V. Medicalization, markets, and consumers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45 (2004) 158-176
12. Daniels C.R., and Golden J. Procreative compounds: Popular eugenics, artificial insemination and the rise of the American sperm banking industry. Journal of Social History 38 1 (2004) 5-27
13. Daniels K.R., and Lewis G. Donor insemination: The gifting and selling of semen. Social Science and Medicine 42 11 (1996) 1521-1536
14. Eko L. Many spiders, one worldwide web: Towards a typology of Internet regulation. Communication Law and Policy 6 3 (2001) 445-484
15. Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992. (1992). Pub. L. 102-493, 42 U.S.C. 263a-1 et seq.
16. Fox N.J., Ward J., and O'Rourke A.J. The 'Expert Patient': Empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Social Science and Medicine 60 6 (2005) 1299-1309
17. Frase-Blunt, M. (2001). Ova-compensating? Women who donate eggs to infertile couples earn a reward-but pay a price. Washington Post, December 4.
18. Hardey M. Doctor in the house: The Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health and Illness 21 6 (1999) 820-835
19. Healy K. Last best gifts: Altruism and the market for human blood and organs (2006), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
20. Henwood F., Wyatt S., Hart A., and Smith J. Ignorance is bliss sometimes: Constraints on the emergence of the 'Informed Patient' in the changing landscapes of health information. Sociology of Health and Illness 25 6 (2003) 589-607
21. Larkin M. Curb costs of egg donation, urge US specialists. Lancet 356 9229 (2000) 569
22. Lown B. Market health care: The commodification of health care. Philosophy and Social Action 26 (2000) 57-71
23. Lupton D. Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Social Science and Medicine 45 3 (1997) 373-381
24. Mariner W. Business vs. medical ethics: Conflicting standards for managed care. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 23 3 (1995) 236-246
25. Martin S. Diverging fertility among women who delay childbearing. Demography 37 4 (2000) 523-533
26. Martin S.P., and Robinson J.P. The income digital divide: Trends and prediction for levels of Internet use. Social Problems 54 1 (2007) 1-22
27. Montagne M. The promotion of medications for personal and social problems. Journal of Drug Issues 22 2 (1992) 389-405
28. Neumann P. Should health insurance cover IVF: Issues and opinions. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 22 5 (1997) 1215-1239
29. Pew Research Center. (2007). Demographics of internet users. The Pew Internet and American Life Project, June 15, 2007. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/trends/User_Demo_6.15.07.htm. Retrieved on July 6, 2007.
30. Prichard J.R.S. A market for babies?. University of Toronto Law Review 34 3 (1984) 341-357
31. Radin M. Contested commodities: The trouble with trade in sex, children, body parts and other things (1996), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
32. Relman A.S. The medical industrial complex. New England Journal of Medicine 303 17 (1980) 963-970
33. Resnik D.B. The commodification of human reproductive materials. Journal of Medical Ethics 24 6 (1998) 388-393
34. Resnik D.B. Regulating the market for human eggs. Bioethics 15 1 (2001) 1-25
35. Rosner D. A once charitable enterprise (1982), Cambridge University Press, New York
36. Rutherford M., and Gallo-Cruz S. Selling the ideal birth: Rationalization and re-enchantment in the marketing of maternity care. In: Chambré S.M., and Goldner M. (Eds). Advances in medical sociology: Patients, consumers and civil society (2008), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK 75-98
37. Sandel, M. (1997). The baby bazaar. New Republic, October 20, p. 25.
38. Spar D.L. The baby business (2006), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
39. Spar D.L. The egg trade-making sense of the market for human oocytes. New England Journal of Medicine 356 13 (2007) 1289-1291
40. Sulik G.A., and Eich-Krohm A. No longer a patient: The social construction of the medical consumer. In: Chambré S.M., and Goldner M. (Eds). Advances in medical sociology: Patients, consumers and civil society (2008), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK 3-28
41. Titmuss R. The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy (1971), Vintage, New York
42. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act. (2006). National conference of commissioners on uniform state laws.
43. U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Households by type and size. Current Population Survey. Available at http://www.census.gov. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
44. Wong K.L. Medicine and the marketplace: The moral dimensions of managed care (1998), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN
45. Zelizer V. The social meaning of money (1994), Basic Books, New York