Examining the nature and extent of the Activity-Travel preplanning decision process

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2054, 2008, Pages 83-92

  Clark, Andrew F ^a   Doherty, Sean T ^a  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY ATTRIBUTES; ACTIVITY SCHEDULING; DAILY ACTIVITY; DECISION PROCESS; DEPTH SURVEYS; EVENT TYPES; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; PRE-PLANNING; SURVEY DESIGN; SURVEY METHODS;

SURVEYS;

EID: 56749181062     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2054-10     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Doherty, S. T., and K. W. Axhausen. The Development of a Unified Modeling Framework for the Household Activity-Travel Scheduling Process. In Traffic and Mobility: Simulation-Economics-Environment (W. Brilon, F. Huber, M. Schreckenberg, and H. Wallentowitz, eds), Springer, Berlin, 1999.
2. Hägerstrand, T. What About People in Regional Science? Regional Science Association Papers, Vol. 24, 1970, pp. 7-21.
3. Cullen, I., and V. Godson. Urban Networks: The Structure of Activity Patterns. Progress in Planning, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1975, pp. 1-96.
4. Root, G. S., and W. W. Recker. Toward a Dynamic Model of Individual Activity Pattern Formulation. In Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis (S. Carpenter and P. Jones, eds.), Gower, Aldershot, England, 1983, pp. 162-180.
5. Doherty, S. T., and E. Miller. A Computerized Household Activity Scheduling Survey. Transportation, Vol. 27, 2000, pp. 75-97.
6. Doherty, S. T., E. Nemeth, M. Roorda, and E. J. Miller. Computerized Household Activity-Scheduling Survey for Toronto, Canada, Area: Design and Assessment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2004, pp. 140-149.
7. Doherty, S. T. Should We Abandon Activity Type Analysis? Redefining Activities by Their Salient Attributes. Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2006, pp. 517-536.
8. Lee, M. S., and M. G. McNally. On the Structure of Weekly Activity/Travel Patterns. Transportation Research A, Vol. 37, 2003, pp. 823-839.
9. Lee, M. S., and M. G. McNally. An Empirical Investigation on the Dynamic Processes of Activity Scheduling and Trip Chaining. Transportation, Vol. 33, 2006. pp. 553-565.
10. Rindsfüser, G., H. Mühlhans, S. T. Doherty, and K. J. Beckmann. Tracing the Planning and Execution of Activities and their Attributes: Design and Application of a Hand-Held Scheduling Process Survey. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2003.
11. Ruiz, T., and H. J. P. Timmermans. Changing the Timing of Activities in Resolving Scheduling Conflicts. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2006.
12. Roorda, M., M. E. H. Lee-Gosselin, S. T. Doherty, E. J. Miller, and P. Rondier. Travel/Activity Panel Surveys in the Toronto and Quebec City Regions: Comparison of Methods and Preliminary Results. Presented at PROCESSUS 2nd International Colloquium on the Behavioural Foundations of Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Frameworks, Models and Applications. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 2005.
13. Roorda, M., S. Saneinejad, and E. J. Miller. Analysis of Routine Weekly Activity/Travel Patterns. Presented at 11th World Conference on Transportation Research, Berkeley, Calif., 2007.
14. Chen, C., T. Garling, and R. Kitamura. Activity Rescheduling: Reasoned or Habitual? Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 7, 2004.
15. Doherty, S. T., D. Papinski, and M. E. H. Lee-Gosselin, Internet-Based Prompted Recall Diary with Automated GPS Activity-Trip Detection: System Design. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2006.