메뉴 건너뛰기
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 326-335
Parental love and the ethics of sex selection

(1)  Herissone Kelly, Peter a  

a NONE
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHARACTER; CHILD PARENT RELATION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INTUITION; LOVE; MORALITY; PARENT; PHILOSOPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS; SPOUSE; UNITED KINGDOM;
EID: 34248388962     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: 14692147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180107070399     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)
References (13)
  • 1
    • 34248370846 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. A Report on the HFEA's 2002-03 Review of Sex Selection Including a Discussion of legislative and Regulatory Options. London: HFEA; 2003.
    • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. A Report on the HFEA's 2002-03 Review of Sex Selection Including a Discussion of legislative and Regulatory Options. London: HFEA; 2003.
  • 2
    • 33745535283 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The prohibition of sex selection for social reasons in the United Kingdom: Public opinion trumps reproductive liberty?
    • See
    • See Herissone-Kelly P. The prohibition of sex selection for social reasons in the United Kingdom: Public opinion trumps reproductive liberty? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2006;15:261-72.
    • (2006) Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , vol.15 , pp. 261-272
    • Herissone-Kelly, P.1
  • 3
    • 34248329035 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 1, HFEA 2003:paragraph 65.
    • See note 1, HFEA 2003:paragraph 65.
  • 4
    • 27144559206 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Acting parentally: An argument against sex selection
    • McDougall R. Acting parentally: An argument against sex selection. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:601-5.
    • (2005) Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.31 , pp. 601-605
    • McDougall, R.1
  • 5
    • 34248390002 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:602.
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:602.
  • 6
    • 34248336516 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:603.
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:603.
  • 7
    • 34248375504 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:603.
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:603.
  • 8
    • 34248403126 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:603.
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:603.
  • 9
    • 34248391688 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:604.
    • See note 4, McDougall 2005:604.
  • 10
    • 34248388784 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • London: Penguin;
    • Weil S. An Anthology. London: Penguin; 2005:293.
    • (2005) An Anthology , pp. 293
    • Weil, S.1
  • 12
    • 18844427023 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reproductive liberty and elitist contempt: Reply to John Harris
    • Thomas Baldwin, however, makes skilful use of Habermas' viewpoint in defending the HFEA's recommendation against allowing nonmedical sex selection. See
    • Thomas Baldwin, however, makes skilful use of Habermas' viewpoint in defending the HFEA's recommendation against allowing nonmedical sex selection. See Baldwin T. Reproductive liberty and elitist contempt: Reply to John Harris. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:288-90.
    • (2005) Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.31 , pp. 288-290
    • Baldwin, T.1
  • 13
    • 34248398724 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 11, Habermas 2003:40-1.
    • See note 11, Habermas 2003:40-1.

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.