Lesion complexity and angiographic outcomes in radial access percutaneous coronary intervention

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 555-561

  Roberts, Elved Bryn ^a   Rathore, Sudhir ^a   Beaumont, Andrew ^a   Alahmar, Albert E ^a   Andron, Mohammed ^a   Palmer, Nicholas D ^a   Perry, Raphael A ^a   Stables, Rodney H ^a  

^a Cardiothoracic Center   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTA ROOT; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; SHEATH REMOVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR LESION;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENGLAND; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 56749173729     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00399.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 29 : 1269 1275.
2. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: A comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 32 : 572 576.
3. Geijer H, Persliden J. Radiation exposure and patient experience during percutaneous coronary intervention using radial and femoral artery access. Eur Radiol 2004 14 : 1674 1680.
4. Lotan C, Hasin Y, Salmoirago E, et al. The radial artery: An applicable approach to complex coronary angioplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 1997 9 : 518 522.
5. Ziakas A, Klinke P, Mildenberger R, et al. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approach in vein graft PCI. A retrospective study. Int J Cardiovasc Interven 2005 7 : 93 96.
6. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol 1988 12 : 529 545.
7. Smith SC Jr., Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines) - executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2001 103 : 3019 3041.
8. Smith SC Jr., Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr., et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006 113 : e166 286.
9. Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005 26 : 804 847.
10. Ellis SG, Guetta V, Miller D, et al. Relation between lesion characteristics and risk with percutaneous intervention in the stent and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa era: An analysis of results from 10,907 lesions and proposal for new classification scheme. Circulation 1999 100 : 1971 1976.
11. Krone RJ, Laskey WK, Johnson C, et al. A simplified lesion classification for predicting success and complications of coronary angioplasty. Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention. Am J Cardiol 2000 85 : 1179 1184.
12. Krone RJ, Shaw RE, Klein LW, et al. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification system in the current "stent era" of coronary interventions (from the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol 2003 92 : 389 394.
13. Zaacks SM, Allen JE, Calvin JE, et al. Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stenosis morphology classification for coronary interventions in the late 1990s. Am J Cardiol 1998 82 : 43 49.