Radiation exposure and patient experience during percutaneous coronary intervention using radial and femoral artery access

European Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1674-1680

  Geijer, Håkan ^a   Persliden, Jan ^a,b  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography, technology; Coronary intervention; Coronary vessels, transluminal angioplasty; Diagnostic radiology; Radiations, exposure to patients

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; MORPHINE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETER; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PAIN; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THORAX PAIN; VASCULAR ACCESS;

AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGINA, UNSTABLE; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BACK PAIN; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PUNCTURES; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION MONITORING;

EID: 4544350201     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2322-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Fransson S-G, Nylander E (1994) Vascular injury following cardiac catheterization, coronary angiography, and coronary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 15:232-235
2. Campeau L (1989) Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 16:3-7
3. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ (1993) Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 30:173-178
4. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, Blaesing L, Burket MW, Basu A, Moore JA (1999) Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 138:430-436
5. Mann JT, Cubeddu G, Arrowood M (1996) Operator radiation exposure in PTCA: comparison of radial and femoral approaches. J Invasive Cardiol 8(Suppl D):22D-25D
6. Sandborg M, Fransson SG, Pettersson H (2004) Evaluation of patient-absorbed doses during coronary angiography and intervention by femoral and radial artery access. Eur Radiol 14:653-658
7. Pipilis A, Ormerod O, Tan LB (1990) Operator radiation exposure and cardiac catheterisation route. Lancet 336:567-568
8. Ugarte M, Martin-Judez V (1992) Radiation exposure after coronary arteriography. Lancet 340:923
9. ICRP (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85. Pergamon, Oxford
10. Geijer H, Beckman K-W, Andersson T, Persliden J (2002) Radiation dose optimization in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). II. Clinical evaluation. Eur Radiol 12:2813-2819
11. Geijer H, Beckman K-W, Andersson T, Persliden J (2002) Radiation dose optimization in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). I. Experimental studies. Eur Radiol 12:2571-2581
12. McConnell EA (1997) Performing Allen's test. Nursing (Brux) 27:26
13. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London
14. Martin CJ, Farquhar F, Stockdale E, MacDonald S (1994) A study of the relationship between patient dose and size in paediatric radiology. Br J Radiol 67:864-871
15. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R (1997) A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the Access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1269-1275
16. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R (1997) Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 40:156-158
17. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, Morice M (2001) Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52:181-187
18. Larrazet F, Dibie A, Philippe F, Palau R, Klausz R, Laborde F (2003) Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Br J Radiol 76:473-477
19. Neofotistou V, Vano E, Padovani R, Kotre J, Dowling A, Toivonen M, Kottou S, Tsapaki V, Willis S, Bernardi G, Faulkner K (2003) Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology. Eur Radiol 13:2259-2263
20. Hildick-Smith DJ, Walsh JT, Lowe MD, Petch MC (2003) Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: the transradial route is successful and safe. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 58:8-10
21. Caputo RP, Simons A, Giambartolomei A, Grant W, Fedele K, Abraham S, Felice P, Reger MJ, Walford GD, Esente P (2001) Safety and efficacy of repeat transradial access for cardiac catheterization procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 54:188-190
22. Louvard Y, Krol M, Pezzano M, Sheers L, Piechaud JF, Marien C, Benaim R, Lardoux H, Morice MC (1999) Feasibility of routine transradial coronary angiography: a single operator's experience. J Invasive Cardiol 11:543-548
23. Koreny M, Riedmüller E, Nikfardjam M, Siostrzonek P, Müllner M (2004) Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 291:350-357
24. Keeling AW, Fisher CA, Haugh KH, Powers ER, Turner MS (2000) Reducing time in bed after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (TIBS III). Am J Crit Care 9:185-187