MetaLex XML and the legal knowledge interchange format

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4884 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 21-41

  Boer, Alexander ^a   Winkels, Radboud ^a   Vitali, Fabio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; GAME THEORY; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INTERCHANGES; INTERSECTIONS; MANAGEMENT; ONTOLOGY; STANDARDS; XML;

DE FACTO; ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENTS; LEGAL KNOWLEDGES; METALEX; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS; XML STANDARDS;

MARKUP LANGUAGES;

EID: 56749159213     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Boer, A., Hoekstra, R., Winkels, R., van Engers, T., Willaert, F.: METAle.x: Legislation in XML. In: Bench-Capon, T., Daskalopulu, A., Winkels, R. (eds.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (Jurix 2002), pp. 1-10. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)
2. METAlex: Jurisdiction and Language. In: Palmirani, M., van Engers, T., Wimmer, M.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the E-Government Workshop in conjunction with JURIX 2003, December 2003, pp. 54-66. Universitätsverlag Rudolf Trauner (2003)
3. Dick, J.P.: Representation of legal text for conceptual retrieval. In: ICAIL 1991: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pp. 244-253. ACM Press, New York (1991)
4. Gordon, T.F.: Constructing arguments with a computational model of an argumentation scheme for legal rules. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 117-121 (2007)
5. Rubino, R., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: An owl ontology of fundamental legal concepts. In: van Engers, T.M. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference, December 2006. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 152, pp. 101-110. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
6. Breuker, J., Boer, A., Hoekstra, R., van den Berg, K.: Developing content for LKIF: Ontologies and frameworks for legal reasoning. In: van Engers, T.M. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference, December 2006. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 152, pp. 169-174. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
7. Bench-Capon, T., Coenen, F.: Exploiting isomorphism: development of a kbs to support british coal insurance claims. In: Sergot, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the third International Conference on AI and Law, New York, pp. 62-69. ACM, New York (1991)
8. Biagioli, C., Francesconi, E., Passerini, A., Montemagni, S., Soria, C.: Automatic semantics extraction in law documents. In: ICAIL, pp. 133-140 (2005)
9. de Maat, E., Winkels, R., van Engers, T.: Making Sense of Legal Texts. In: Grewendorf, G., Rathert, M. (eds.) Formal Linguistics and Law, Mouton, De Gruyter, Berlin. Trends in Linguistics - Studies and Monographs (TiLSM) (in press, 2008)
10. Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Di Bello, M., Boer, A.: The LKIF Core ontology of basic legal concepts. In: Casanovas, P., Biasiotti, M.A., Francesconi, E., Sagri, M.T. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques (LOAIT 2007) (June 2007)
11. Makinson, D.: On a fundamental problem of deontic logic. In: McNamara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems. New Studies in Deontic Logic and Computer Science. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 49, pp. 29-53. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)
12. Chisholm, R.M.: Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis 24, 33-36 (1963)
13. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
14. Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical and computational foundations. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove (2000)
15. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with dolce. In: Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 223-233. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
16. Dennett, D.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)
17. Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Di Bello, M., Boer, A.: LKIF Core: Principled ontology development for the legal domain. In: Breuker, J., Casanovas, P., Klein, M., Francesconi, E. (eds.) Law, Ontologies, and the Semantic Web. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008) (submitted for review)
18. Gordon, T.F., Prakken, H., Walton, D.: The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence 171(10-11), 875-896 (2007)
19. Boer, A.: The Consultancy Game. In: Breuker, J.A., Leenes, R., Winkels, R.G.F. (eds.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2000: The Thirteenth Annual Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 99-112. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)
20. Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Rosati, R., Sattler, U.: Can OWL and logic programming live together happily ever after? In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 501-514. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)